and fund it with a collective ownership group
if i ran a major league baseball franchise i’d feed every stat imaginable into frontier ai models & basically delegate the roster construction + entire game management layer to them. no traditional manager & no gm making baseball decisions by gut ever. the manager & gm are both ai agents.
for every game every pitch would update the model including exit velocity, pitch velocity, spin, fatigue, matchups, positioning, bullpen availability / usage, etc. & it would continuously simulate thousands of scenarios & make the highest expected value decision in real time.
then over a 162 game season it watches every game afterward through precision cameras, grades every decision, learns from every outcome, & gets better.
baseball might be the perfect sport for this. it has discrete events, absurd amounts of data, repeated situations, & a gigantic sample size.
billy beane found mispriced players but this finds mispriced decisions too on every layer.
can some billionaire please buy an mlb franchise & let me run this experiment pretty please?
this would be the houston astros on steroids. imagine ai winning a ring?
cc @JoshuaKushner
Maybe: commodore retweeted
I have come up with a literally crazy idea that I'm building and it will be super fun.
I'll have a memecoin for it and I need some KOLs to market it. (No stealth marketing, always fully acknowledge your marketing).
I would give you tokens at the start. DM me.
Why is crypto not going up while everything is?
Because a large majority of you cunts spent the last cycle promoting garbage negative sum meme coins to newcomers
Now those people hate crypto and your meme coin is worth zero regardless while some scamming cunt drives a new lambo
exactly this
thank god I saw this in 2023 & got out of ETH
rolled into AI & have made a killing
guys ETH can be used heavily & still be never going up since it switched
What if Ethereum keeps winning but ETH stops mattering?
David on why he went from Bankless to ETHless, and why Ethereum adoption may not be enough to save ETH the asset
"Vitalik is trying to protect Ethereum's soul. You can empathize with why, but it feels like there are interests that prohibit Ethereum growth and therefore ETH growth"
"The layer 2s, the banks tokenizing money markets, all this Ethereum adoption is great. The network is great. But it does not need a valuable ether to do any of those things"
"ETH as a money meme is in a trough. Confidence in Ether the asset feels like 2019 lows, and the Ethereum Foundation is not really stepping in to help"
after a strong 2025 angel investing in ai infra, agentic payment rails will sit on crypto but money making opportunities will be limited and not on ETH
DeFi was replicating bad practices TradFi with the cover that TradFi was doing the same thing
it’s been rotten to its core since it was invented
insiders propping shit up, doing complicated mechanisms to print yield out of thin air
the game of musical chairs is over
DeFi is dead and most of you still don’t understand what it actually was
It was never a financial system. It was a loop designed to manufacture synthetic valuations from minimal capital
Protocols didn’t grow capital, they multiplied how it was counted by turning one deposit into multiple positions
A token gets emitted, you’re paid to deposit it, and that deposit is recorded as TVL. That’s position one.
You borrow stables against that same collateral, deploy them somewhere else, and now that same base capital is supporting a second position on another protocol
Then you take the LP token from that, restake or loop it again, and it gets counted a third time
Lets simplify it with $100:
> You deposit $100 into a protocol, that’s your first position and it’s recorded as $100 TVL
> You borrow $80 against that same $100 and deposit it somewhere else, now there’s another $80 being counted
> You borrow $60 against that $80 and deploy it again, now that’s another layer
You take the receipt from that and loop it one more time
On paper you now have $280+ across protocols, but in reality its still the same $100
This is the same illusion as altcoins printing billion dollar market caps on tiny float
A $2B token with 5% circulating isn’t $2B of value, it’s $100M of liquidity marked higher by thin trading
DeFi did the same thing with TVL. Instead of multiplying price across supply, it multiplied the same capital across protocols
TVL became FDV in a different format
Protocols emitted tokens to LPs, counted those tokens as TVL, then counted the incentivized volume as usage
That volume generated fees, fees justified valuation, valuation justified emissions, and the loop continued
No external demand was needed and the system kept feeding itself
Every narrative ran the same structure. Yield farming, LSDs, restaking, points. Different names for the same mechanic
You weren’t earning yield. You were being paid in dilution
At the peak, $200B+ TVL implied capital that never existed. The real base was a fraction of that, looped, leveraged and counted multiple times
Each protocol reported it independently, dashboards aggregated it as if it was additive
That’s how the industry looked massive
This is why altcoin market caps and DeFi TVL broke at the same time
Both were built on internal pricing, thin liquidity, and recycled capital. One inflated valuation through float, the other through collateral loops
Neither represented real economic scale
The fragility came from this exact structure. The hacks weren’t random....
You don’t extract hundreds of millions from systems generating real external cash flow, you extract from systems where the value was already abstract
Strip out token denominated TVL, emission based yield, recycled collateral, and wash volume. What’s left is a small set of protocols actually moving capital
DeFi didn’t fail. It worked exactly as designed. It took limited capital, looped it, marked it higher, and distributed it
Now that the loop is visible, the numbers don’t hold
That’s why it doesn’t bounce. There’s nothing underneath it to support the scale it once claimed
Maybe: commodore retweeted
vibe coding web2 consumer apps and finding meaningful ways to build blockchain under the hood might actually be better for crypto than vibe coding another prediction market app or trading agent. just sayin.
Maybe: commodore retweeted
in 9 years of being in crypto, I have never been less optimistic about its future than I am now
Maybe: commodore retweeted
At ethcc I figured out why crypto feels dead.
founders stopped building anything that needs a token.
so now we build yield aggregators on top of yield aggregators on top of... tokens nobody's launching anymore.
But all of that "yield" sits on top of token economies, all of it traces back to someone somewhere believing in a token. cut off new token launches and you starve the entire yield stack from below.
crypto is slowly dieing unless we make people believe in tokens again.
realizing @KrauseHouseDAO was just retardmaxxing before it had a name
need to do this more in life



















