Open responses in JQL regarding my discussion paper:
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1…
I look forward to your thoughts and short papers on LLMs and Linguistics! :-)
Therfer retweeted
Continuing with with early life origins, Weiss et al. analyzed 6.1 million genes and found 355 protein families likely present in the last common universal ancestor, suggesting it was anaerobic, CO2-fixing, H2-dependent, N2-fixing, and thermophilic: nature.com/articles/nmicrobi…
Therfer retweeted
El telescopi espacial Euclides ha descobert un nou cometa. Es troba a uns 1.300 milions de quilòmetres de la Terra. Imatge: ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, M. Pöntinen et al. 2026
Therfer retweeted
Día Internacional del Cáncer de Mama #CancerDeMama #DíaMundialContraelCáncerdeMama #DiaMundialDelCancerDeMama diariodesevilla.es/miki-duar… vía @diariosevilla
Therfer retweeted
"Contemporary Mathematics" is a free textbook that introduces fundamental mathematical concepts over nearly 1,900 pages through clear explanations, numerous worked examples and exercises.
The book covers set theory, logic, Venn diagrams, mathematical statements and proofs, De Morgan’s laws, number systems, elementary number theory, prime numbers, rational and irrational numbers, arithmetic sequences, geometric sequences, numeral systems, calculations in different bases, and many other topics, providing a broad overview of foundational mathematics.
It is particularly useful for high school students, and I recommend keeping it if you have children studying mathematics at that level. The book is well structured, accessible, and enjoyable to browse, making it a valuable resource for both learning and reviewing mathematical concepts.
assets.openstax.org/oscms-pr…
Therfer retweeted
Google has another banger 🤯
It’s called PaperBanana.
It turns your methodology text into academic illustrations, helping you explain your research visually.
100% free.
Therfer retweeted
Los matemáticos siguen tratando de asimilar el terremoto que ha causado la IA en su campo. Lo que mucha gente no entiende es que un efecto similar acabará llegando a otras disciplinas, aunque campos teóricos lo "sentirán" antes. En este novedoso estudio, se ha comprobado cómo distintas IAs son capaces de resolver retos de investigación de nivel doctoral en física. Incluso sin acceso a internet y sin intervención humana, destacando especialmente ChatGPT Astra (49 de 50 problemas resueltos). La rapidez y el bajo coste de resolverlos (lo que cuesta un café) deberían hacernos reflexionar a todos sobre lo que debería ser "investigar" en el año 2026.
arxiv.org/abs/2610.16733
Therfer retweeted
Limited support for functional explanations of syntactic harmony (i.e. that languages tend to order the grammatical head and its dependents consistently because this facilitates language processing and learning efficiency)
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
Therfer retweeted
Prefrontal cortex as a meta-reinforcement learning system
nature.com/articles/s41593-0…
1. The traditional dopamine theory: The canonical model proposes that dopamine (DA) signals reward prediction errors (RPEs), strengthening or weakening synaptic connections to reinforce associations between situations, actions, and rewards.
2. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) also supports learning: Evidence shows that the PFC represents action values, reward history, previous choices, and upcoming actions, suggesting that it can implement its own reward-based learning computations.
3. A new theory — meta-reinforcement learning (meta-RL): Rather than treating dopamine and the PFC as separate, competing learning systems, the theory proposes that dopamine trains the PFC network to develop its own independent learning algorithm.
4. The brain as a recurrent neural network: The authors model the PFC, together with interconnected basal ganglia and thalamic regions, as a recurrent neural network that integrates sensory inputs, previous actions, and reward information to guide decisions.
5. Two learning timescales: Dopamine-driven synaptic plasticity operates across extended experience, shaping network connectivity. Once trained, the PFC's neural activity dynamics support faster learning within individual tasks, even when synaptic weights remain fixed.
6. Adaptive learning rates: The model adjusts its learning rate according to environmental volatility. It learns faster when reward probabilities change frequently and more slowly when conditions remain stable, resembling observed human behavior.
7. Explaining reward prediction errors and inferred values: The framework explains how dopamine signals can reflect inferred changes in reward value, even when an outcome has not been directly experienced. The PFC's learned representation of task structure can influence the predictions contributing to dopamine signals.
8. Model-based behavior can emerge from model-free training: Simulations of the two-step decision-making task produced behavior consistent with model-based learning. This suggests that dopamine-driven training can create PFC dynamics capable of exploiting task structure without requiring a separate model-based learning algorithm during testing.
9. Learning to learn: After training across many related tasks, the model rapidly adapts to unfamiliar stimuli and can learn new reward associations from very little experience. This mirrors the improvement in learning efficiency observed in animal experiments.
10. Dopamine may have a dual role: In addition to modifying synaptic plasticity, dopamine signals may convey reward information that directly influences ongoing PFC activity. The framework therefore offers an alternative interpretation of optogenetic experiments that manipulate dopamine and change decision-making behavior.
Key takeaway: The central idea is that dopamine teaches the prefrontal cortex how to learn. Dopamine-driven synaptic changes gradually shape a recurrent neural network whose activity can then implement a faster, flexible learning algorithm. By connecting neuroscience with recurrent neural networks and meta-learning in AI, this theory offers a unified computational explanation for reward-based learning, adaptive decision-making, and learning to learn.
Therfer retweeted
La violación sistemática en muchos centros educativos de los derechos de su alumnado de 16 y 18 años xarxatic.com/la-violacion-si…. Actualizado artículo con enlace al informe jurídico de la AEPD (gracias @mininacheshire) en el que matiza un texto de ellos que algunos me pasasteis.
Therfer retweeted
Me alegra mucho anunciaros la publicación de mi nuevo libro, con el que pretendo acercar a familias y educadores la ciencia del aprendizaje y el desarrollo en los primeros años: «¿Cómo aprenden los bebés?».⬇️
Therfer retweeted
As part of my appointment as Mercator Visiting Professor for AI in the Human Context, I will be presenting "The Différance Engine" as the closing keynote at the "Philosophy of Technology and AI" conference. @UniBonn 6 November 2026.
desirableai.com/events/philo…
Therfer retweeted
Me publican hoy esto en El Mundo.
El síndrome Galatea o el gusto irresistible por la tecnología share.google/wRFy7CDHSJHWGm8…
Therfer retweeted
Si un estudiante puede entregar un buen trabajo con ayuda de IA, necesitamos comprobar qué comprende y qué sabe hacer con lo que ha entregado.
Por ejemplo, pedirle que justifique una decisión, detecte un error o aplique lo aprendido a un caso distinto. La evidencia que necesitamos depende de lo que queramos evaluar.
Con esa idea he creado el Banco de evidencias de aprendizaje, un recurso abierto y gratuito para explorar distintas formas de hacer visible ese aprendizaje. Sigue en desarrollo y puede servir como punto de partida para revisar tareas y evaluaciones.
Puedes consultarlo aquí:
evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com…
La IA pone en entredicho el Plan Bolonia: "Los TFG no tienen sentido; los estudiantes buscan caminos para aprobar y no aprenden" 20minutos.es/nacional/ia-pon…
Therfer retweeted
¿La IA volverá tu cerebro perezoso? Esto es lo que revelan las nuevas investigaciones
El artículo está bien, aunque nada del otro mundo. Lo que son preciosas son las ilustraciones de @juliacastrov 😍
nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
Therfer retweeted
这篇我很推荐,尤其是现在做科研的人。
作者 Pierre Marion 提了一个很有意思的判断。LLM 如果真的把算公式、写代码、搜文献、做实验这些环节加速 10 倍甚至 100 倍,科研里最稀缺的东西会慢慢转向选什么问题、怎么建模、以及怎么判断结果有没有价值。
更值得警惕的是,AI 省下来的时间如果只是拿去发更多论文,最后很可能只是把 publish-or-perish 加速到失控。作者甚至直接判断,以论文数量和 h-index 为核心的评价体系正在失效。
作者最后给的方向是让 AI 扩大探索空间,把人的时间留给判断、品味、理解和培养下一代研究者。
以后科研能力可能像「你会不会驾驭一支极快的 AI 研究团队」,而不是一个人能亲手完成多少步骤。
文章:
pierremarion23.github.io/tho…
¿Cómo ayuda la tecnoética a abordar los desafíos de la Inteligencia Artificial? Lo abordo en este artículo de la
@RevistaCTS @oeidigital:
Ética de la inteligencia artificial: De la tecnoética de Mario Bunge a los desafíos contemporáneos
📖 PDF: ojs.revistacts.net/index.php…
🤖vs🙂
Therfer retweeted
"El verdadero objetivo de la educación tecnológica nunca fue conseguir que las personas pensaran como máquinas. Era conseguir que las personas aprendieran mejor a pensar por sí mismas".
✍️@therfer
educationalevidence.com/mins…
#maricarmen
Foto original: @OlmoCalvo
#maricarmen
Foto original: @OlmoCalvo



























