Reflecting on life, society & dignity Calm thoughts on difficult questions No hate. No noise. Only perspective
India
Joined January 2026
- Tweets6.5K
- Following242
- Followers277
- Likes676
Courts seems complicit in crime against constitution across the globe
Ideally they were supposed to safeguard it against treason
Tabrez Talks retweeted
One more bombshell #ECI #VoteChori
ECINet, the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) comprehensive digital platform, has a feature through which viewing of enumeration form details is enabled State by State. This means that access for State Nodal Officers (SNOs) could be switched off anytime making it a centralised platform, according to an audit by ‘Charchagram’, a civic tech initiative.
✍️@sreeparna_c
thehindu.com/news/national/o…
Kisne banaya ye mujasma ??
#WATCH Panchkula, Haryana: On the occasion of Dussehra, a 221-foot-tall effigy of Ravana has been prepared in the city.
Tabrez Talks retweeted
No amount of efforts by powers that be & #GodiMedia to silence #VoteChori succeeds.
1. This audit by Charchagram found #WestBengal singled out, since 28/9 that d notorious #ECINET code is set to restrict D state's EROs & AEROs from accessing, reviewing enumeration forms, reviewing notice-hearing dashboard etc
2. This effectively means an illegally introduced centralised software is engaging statutory rights of voters through curbing roles of EROs/AEROs.
3. Remember #SeemaKhanna?
4. Remember the TCS-ECINET nexus!
5.#ScrapSIR #Revertto2024-25 Voter lists. @MamataOfficial @Dolasen7 @sagarikaghose @PriyankKharge @RahulGandhi
Islam actually restricts men from accessing multiple women illegally.
Generally men are polygamous in nature. They try to access multiple women in one way or another. From stalking to soft porn to porn to prostitution.
Or through girlfriends wives and extramarital affairs.
Islam condemns these practices (expect marriage ) and permits a man to be with one woman for life or at most four wives under the condition that he treats them justly and equally.
If you look at it from an outsider’s perspective you will find that many non-Muslim or non-practising men access more than four women without giving them the status of a wife.
Meanwhile practising Muslim men generally have one or two wives and rarely four.
Yet this hypocritical world is ready to accept a man with a two-digit body count and one wife while condemning a man who seeks to marry one or two women or at most four under the condition of treating them justly and equally.
The point is that men will seek multiple women either legally or illegally.
It is your point of view to decide which way of life is better and more practical.
With this new feminist take of aborting male children under the slogan “my body my choice” is a sign of the prophecy of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ that the Hour will not come until women outnumber men so much that one man will be responsible for 50 women?
Tabrez Talks retweeted
Gems of UP SIR :
17 people. 34 voter IDs. One booth in Bulandshahr.
15 filed just ONE Form 6 each as per available data available on UP CEO website, yet all 17 appear twice in the final roll with different voter IDs.
Hello Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup, We were told, SIR was supposed to remove duplicates. How did your process create them? Who is responsible?
Instead of trying to intimidate “Mr Fact-Checker,” do the job entrusted to you. Explain these discrepancies, fix the rolls and answer the public. Bullying those who expose failures is no substitute for accountability.
#UPSIRFiles
Hello, Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup. Stop acting like a troll by threatening citizens who point out flaws in SIR.
The SIR exercise in Uttar Pradesh was completed and the final electoral rolls were published in April 2026. Yet duplicate entries remain unresolved. Wasn’t eliminating duplicate entries one of the central objectives of this entire exercise?
Also, do you understand sarcasm? “Buy one, get one free” was precisely that.
In your own tweet, you acknowledge issuing four voter ID cards with different EPIC numbers to one person. How did four applications in the same person’s name pass scrutiny and result in four separate voter IDs?
Submitting four Form6 applications is wrong. Accepting and processing those duplicate requests exposes an even bigger failure in verification. What is the point of SIR if your system cannot detect repeated applications from the same person? If someone applies for fresh enrolment ten times, will @ECISVEEP issue ten different voter IDs?
Further, according to the Form 9 records uploaded on your own UP CEO website, Mr. Sundar submitted Form 6 on January 6 and again on January 14. We have the data for that booth. These are your own official records. This data was uploaded on your own UP CEO website. Also Please upload all Form9s on your website. Many are still missing. Instead of threatening us, Please put more efforts on fixing the failures instead of threatening citizens who expose them.
There are many such cases, Let me share a few more examples here.
Follow below thread. 🧵🔥
Tabrez Talks retweeted
Hello, Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup. Stop acting like a troll by threatening citizens who point out flaws in SIR.
The SIR exercise in Uttar Pradesh was completed and the final electoral rolls were published in April 2026. Yet duplicate entries remain unresolved. Wasn’t eliminating duplicate entries one of the central objectives of this entire exercise?
Also, do you understand sarcasm? “Buy one, get one free” was precisely that.
In your own tweet, you acknowledge issuing four voter ID cards with different EPIC numbers to one person. How did four applications in the same person’s name pass scrutiny and result in four separate voter IDs?
Submitting four Form6 applications is wrong. Accepting and processing those duplicate requests exposes an even bigger failure in verification. What is the point of SIR if your system cannot detect repeated applications from the same person? If someone applies for fresh enrolment ten times, will @ECISVEEP issue ten different voter IDs?
Further, according to the Form 9 records uploaded on your own UP CEO website, Mr. Sundar submitted Form 6 on January 6 and again on January 14. We have the data for that booth. These are your own official records. This data was uploaded on your own UP CEO website. Also Please upload all Form9s on your website. Many are still missing. Instead of threatening us, Please put more efforts on fixing the failures instead of threatening citizens who expose them.
There are many such cases, Let me share a few more examples here.
Follow below thread. 🧵🔥
Mr Fact-checker please fact-check your own facts.
There is no such scheme as “Buy one Get one free” scheme by Election Commission.
As per your post, the voter had submitted only two applications and he got 4 EPIC cards.
This statement is false.
The voter had submitted 4 applications.
If you want to dispute our facts then you post the reference numbers of two applications that you claim he had submitted and we will post the reference number of the remaining two.
The problem of generation of multiple EPICs on submission of multiple forms of an individual is a long standing one. We do deduplication through ECINET periodically. We are on path to achieving the objective of catching multiple forms submitted by an individual at the submission stage only. We will achieve our objective very soon.
Please do not incite people by making patently false statements about ECI and thereby trying to create disaffection among the citizens towards a Constitutional Body.
You are advised to rectify your mistake by amending or deleting your post after completing your own due diligence now that you have been informed by us about your wrong information.
Evindance is there in daily news but courts will wait for a date to pass judgement which will be inclined towarda govt!
As the Election Commission launches a special drive in 20 states to bring back voters “left out” in the SIR, its officers are staring at a unique problem: persuading lakhs, possibly crores, of people to fill Form 6, the “Application Form for New Voters,” which asks them to declare they are applying “for the first time.”
Form 6 is the right route back, and officials say signing it invites no legal action. But people who’ve voted for decades balk at calling themselves new, and many believe the declaration is false.
Against that backdrop, Maharashtra’s CEO has proposed a fix: drop “New Voters” from the title, and let the deleted say they were enrolled before and cite their old EPIC number.
Break by @vallabhozarkarr
indianexpress.com/article/in… via @IndianExpress
Tabrez Talks retweeted
As the Election Commission launches a special drive in 20 states to bring back voters “left out” in the SIR, its officers are staring at a unique problem: persuading lakhs, possibly crores, of people to fill Form 6, the “Application Form for New Voters,” which asks them to declare they are applying “for the first time.”
Form 6 is the right route back, and officials say signing it invites no legal action. But people who’ve voted for decades balk at calling themselves new, and many believe the declaration is false.
Against that backdrop, Maharashtra’s CEO has proposed a fix: drop “New Voters” from the title, and let the deleted say they were enrolled before and cite their old EPIC number.
Break by @vallabhozarkarr
indianexpress.com/article/in… via @IndianExpress
Tabrez Talks retweeted
◾𝗘𝗩𝗠/𝗩𝗩𝗣𝗔𝗧 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲
Pre-installation firmware chain
We were told that electoral rolls were protected because the ERO is the statutory authority - decentralised, independent and empowered by law. But then ECINet showed us something deeply troubling, that law may give an officer(ERO) discretion, but programmed 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲,centralized in Delhi, can determine whether that officer(ERO) is actually able to exercise it
𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮'𝘀 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆.
◾𝗘𝗩𝗠/𝗩𝗩𝗣𝗔𝗧 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗘𝗟 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗘𝗖𝗜𝗟.
According to the ECI, firmware is loaded into EVM/VVPAT microcontrollers by BEL and ECIL at their manufacturing facilities and then locked in one -time-programmable (OTP) memory. The ECI states that only designated engineers have access during that manufacturing process.
The source code is written by a selected group of just 2–3 engineers & subsequently tested before the machine code is loaded into microcontrollers
▪️Whenever 𝗱𝗼𝘂𝗯𝘁𝘀 are raised
The ECI's position is that after approved firmware is loaded and the microcontroller is made One-Time Programmable (OTP), that particular chip cannot subsequently be reprogrammed
But that answers what happens 𝗔𝗙𝗧𝗘𝗥 the code is burnt
◾But with ECINet, we have already seen how 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 can determine what changes are technologically permitted, even where the law vests that discretion in a statutory authority.
◾That makes the QUESTION about 𝗘𝗩𝗠/𝗩𝗩𝗣𝗔𝗧 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 even more important-
1- What guarantees the integrity of the 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗕𝗘𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘 it is burnt into the chip?
Saying “OTP means it can't be changed afterwards” answers the post-manufacture question. It does not, by itself, answer whether the correct and independently verified program was burnt into the OTP chip in the first place.
2- Who independently verifies the code before OTP?
3 - Could EVM code theoretically be changed at the development- manufacturing end, before firmware is burnt into the chip?
👉🏼Yes - the source code is 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 and can be changed by whoever is authorised to develop it.
If software architecture could constrain the statutory powers of an ERO
4- What independent safeguards ensure that no comparable concentration of technological control exists anywhere in the EVM/VVPAT software during development, firmware verification and deployment chain?
5- Who writes each version of the BEL and ECIL EVM/VVPAT source code?
6-Who can authorise a source-code change?
7-Who controls the source repository and audit logs?
8-Who independently reviews the actual source, rather than merely functional behaviour?
9-Is the final firmware reproducibly built from the reviewed source?
10-Who independently verifies that the firmware burnt into randomly selected production EVMs is bit-for-bit identical to the authenticated approved build?
We are witnessing deeply troubling signs of manipulation of the electoral process. Red flags are at every crucial stage, while transparency remains conspicuously absent 👇🏼
◾𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱
𝗕𝗝𝗣-𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗘𝗟
In January 2024, former Union Secretary E.A.S. Sarma wrote to the Election Commission raising concerns that at least four BEL independent directors allegedly had BJP affiliations.
The names reported at the time included -Shyama Singh, Shivnath Yadav, Mansukhbhai Khachariya and P.V. Parthasarathi.
ptinews.com/story/national…
sjcdeptcomm.wordpress.com/20……
◾BEL's board has since changed.
The current BEL disclosures, the independent directors include Pradeep Tripathi and Bharatsinh Prabhatsinh Parmar.
Bharatsinh Prabhatsinh Parmar is a former Rajya Sabha MP, and election affidavit records identify him as having been elected as a BJP candidate.
myneta.info/rajsab09aff/ca…
Men to men: She is not waiting for you. The version of her you once knew is no more. She buried it so deep within herself that she won't be able to bring it back even if she tries.
So when you meet her again by chance you will be meeting a new person with an old face.
Accept it
Dissent is a right in a working democracy
And it starts from college
Restore student union at Jamia
#jamia