Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker) header
Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker) profile picture

Economy, Geopolitics, Politics, Technology, Innovation, Neuroscience, Art, founder and owner of SylSoulFood support #VeritàperGiulioRegeni

the Netherlands
Joined February 2010
Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)Photo by Sylvana de Backer (@syldebacker)
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
She told my 17-year-old son I wanted him gone before he turned 18. She said I only kept him out of obligation and that I wouldn’t have the courage to say it to his face. So he packed his bags. When I got home and found out, she looked me in the eye and said if he stays, she’s done. I took off my ring and chose my son. Would you have done the same?
She says only a man planing to leave will ask for a prenup Is this LOVE or MONEY?
155
573
6
6,796
372,873
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
BREAKING: Trump TORPEDOES Republicans at the last second by announcing that he'll "move to Israel" and run for prime minister if Americans "get tired" of him as we head to the polls. He just said the quiet part out loud... "Mr. President, I just want to clarify something you said earlier when it comes to Israel aid. We understand we've cut off aid to Israel, that we were giving them $4 billion, and you're no longer going to be giving them $4 billion," Fox's Brian Kilmeade said to Trump during an interview. "We were giving them $4 billion," said Trump. "We are, but it gets cut off at the end of the year." "Why?" asked Kilmeade. "Why? Because they don't need it, Brian. I mean, I asked them, because they don't need it," said Trump. "And because why should we suffer the slings from lunatics like an El-Sayed when they don't need it? It's a bad talking point, because you say, why don't we give everybody $4 billion? Israel's our number one. We give them more than anybody else. And they no longer need it. We've been doing it for years. I've been doing it. But Israel is a very thriving country." "They don't need it. If they did need it, I would say keep it going. But Bibi Netanyahu, we reached an agreement on that," added Trump. "And can I be honest with you? He brought it up. He brought it up. He said, I think it would be appropriate if we do not receive aid. Because he understands that this is one of their points of contention. Israel's been a great ally, much more reliable than most. I mean, look what happened with Europe, although they did give me Greenland for the United States." Now, hold on a second. Cut off aid to Israel? That sure doesn't sound like Trump, the most rabidly "Israel First" President in American history. This is the same guy who launched a disastrous war of aggression against Iran, with no American interests at stake, just because Netanyahu asked him to. So what's going on here? The answer, you won't be surprised to learn, is not what it seems. Netanyahu is indeed pushing for an end to formal American financial support for his country, but it's not because he no longer wants American bombs, bullets, and drones to fuel his bloody dreams of conquest. It's because he realizes that Israel's approval in the U.S. has cratered thanks to the slaughter in Gaza. In a few short years, most Americans will likely support ending ALL aid to Israel. Netanyahu is getting ahead of that problem by removing the easy to see (and thus curtail) financial aid in favor of a deeper, more opaque entwining of the U.S. and Israeli militaries. Rather than $4 billion in aid, Israeli officials are proposing a $16 billion joint American-Israeli fund for researching and developing new weapons. In other words, our support wouldn't evaporate, it would shapeshift. The proposed 2027 National Defense Authorization Act would greatly expand these joint-defense initiatives. On top of that, the new arrangement would give Congress less direct control to curtail Israeli aggression. “But this is a Netanyahu ruse to say, ‘Okay, we don’t want the aid, but let’s just have joint production on the weapons,'" explained Rep. Ro Khanna. In other words, Trump isn't suddenly deciding to revert to his promises of putting America's interests first, he's simply occluding the ways in which he prioritizes Israel. Which is why it makes sense that he'd fantasize about moving there. "So I'm the number one, I was so voted, I'm at 99% approval rating in Israel can you believe it?" Trump said during that Fox interview. "In fact, if people ever got tired of me in the U.S. I'll move to Israel and become Prime minister. But I'm at ninety— Think of it! I'm at ninety-nine— I have the highest approval rating of anybody in history, because I've been— You know I've been— They've been a great partner but what we did, we stopped Iran." While Trump appears to have pulled that 99% number straight out of his diaper-clad rear end, he does indeed enjoy high approval in Israel with a recent Gallup poll showing that 62% of Israelis approve of U.S. leadership. Of course, that's cold comfort for the American people, who are being forced to pay higher grocery and gas prices because of a war that was started solely to aid in Israel's territorial expansion in the Middle East. Israel may approve of Trump, but the U.S. does not. And today, we show him that at the polls! Please ❤️ and share if you wish that Trump WOULD move to Israel!
277
1,152
65
4,500
624,085
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
And the #MAGAMorons applaud for him! #depraved
161
576
31
1,838
35,256
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
54
932
54
1,590
32,170
Incredible scenes in Melbourne Australia as it’s announced Texas has gone blue and Trump has lost the midterms
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is from the 2022 Fifa World Cup Match between Australia and Denmark. x.com/jamessmartLP/s…
586
2,833
206
24,193
1,259,053
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Oh my … @grok is this true?
1
1
9
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
I knew I'll find this picture soon or later. Manifest it to me. I remember watching this interview can't remember the show. Either Montel or Donahue. This has to be the only truth he's ever spoken. I can't believe they selected this dumbass as president.
22
451
24
607
7,749
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
This Australian's reply to Trump's rant about “NATO not being there for America” is perfect. "Mate. You run a country with 600,000 homeless people sleeping on the street tonight. A country where 40% of adults can't cover a $400 emergency without borrowing money. A country where insulin costs more than a car payment and people are rationing it to survive. A country where medical debt is the number 1 cause of bankruptcy. A country where women are dying in hospital car parks because doctors are too scared of abortion laws to treat a miscarriage. You lock up more of your own citizens than any nation on earth. More than China. More than Russia. More than North Korea. The land of the free has 2 million people in cages, and a quarter of them haven't even been convicted of anything. They're just too poor to make bail. Your life expectancy is going backwards. You're the only developed nation where that's happening. Your infant mortality rate is worse than Cuba's. Your kids do active shooter drills between maths and English while you sell the gunmaker's stock to your mates. Your minimum wage hasn't moved in 15 years. You've got teachers working 2 jobs and veterans sleeping under bridges and you just spent a trillion dollars flattening a country that didn't attack you. And you’ve got a convicted felon, adjudicating raping, paedophile protecting, porn star shagging insurrectionist running the biggest dumpster fire war campaign since the Taliban in Afghanistan thanked you very much for losing again. And you're calling Greenland poorly run? Greenland has universal healthcare. Free education. One of the lowest incarceration rates in the world. Nobody goes bankrupt there because they got sick. Nobody dies in a waiting room because their insurance said no. 'NATO wasn't there when we needed them." When exactly was that, champ? September 11? Because NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in history FOR YOU. Soldiers from dozens of countries deployed, fought, bled, and died in Afghanistan FOR YOU. Australia wasn't even in NATO and we still showed up. For 20 years. And you pulled out at 2am without telling anyone and left them to deal with the mess. So maybe before you start calling other countries poorly run, have a look at your own backyard, you spray-tanned aluminium siding salesman. The only thing poorly run in this picture is your f----- mouth." Credit to: Jim Keller
823
9,459
612
30,658
786,974
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Good morning ☀️ 🎶
105
1,028
97
2,664
55,380
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Replying to @HalfwayPost
It was a knockout campaign speech.
42
126
8
644
18,215
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Hillary Clinton: “The profit that the Trump family has made off of the presidency could pay for a full year of SNAP benefits for about 1.3M people, 600M free school lunches, or three months of groceries for the 5.2M people who have been thrown off SNAP. Wasting your tax money, the corruption is rife, it’s undermining government services, even our national defense, and hurting people who should be able to get support because of their needs for food or to pay their bills. We already know that he’s a fraudster”
1,862
2,999
164
8,370
161,408
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
This isn’t happening fast enough.
240
1,843
94
5,058
79,805
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Rob Jetten wordt vader en zijn privéleven wordt nationaal nieuws. We zijn zo gewend geraakt aan oude mannen in het Torentje dat een premier die een kind verwacht kennelijk een nieuwswaardige gebeurtenis is. De collectieve ophef is opmerkelijk. Het vaderschap van Jetten is privé.
282
53
13
321
23,522
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Occupy Democrats 2͏h͏ · BREAKING: PANIC! Trump is DESPERATELY trying to stop Jack Smith from testifying in his own $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC. Donald Trump sued the BBC for defamation, asking for a whopping $10 billion in damages. Now, he’s panicking about the one witness who might actually know something about the behavior that led the British broadcaster to publish what it did. According to The New Republic, the BBC subpoenaed former special counsel Jack Smith to testify as part of its defense against Trump’s defamation suit. The suit claims the network defamed him with deceptive editing in a 2024 documentary about the January 6 Capitol attack. Trump’s lawyers filed a motion Friday to block the deposition, arguing that “Smith lacks any personal knowledge regarding the issues in this matter.” Their reasoning: Smith wasn’t at the January 6 speech, didn’t help prepare it, and can’t know what Trump was thinking. They say anything he gathered was “secondhand knowledge” from materials collected from other sources. The BBC’s lawyers weren’t impressed. They wrote that “none of [Trump]’s arguments for blocking the deposition of Mr. Smith can withstand scrutiny.” They noted that Smith himself doesn’t object to testifying, and that Trump still has to prove he “did not foment or incite the January 6 Capitol riot,” which he claims the documentary falsely implied. Then came the line that says it all: “No one forced Plaintiff to file this lawsuit and to dispute that his speech on January 6 incited the violence that followed at the Capitol. But as long as he chooses to maintain the case, he cannot commit the fundamental injustice of preventing the BBC from obtaining the evidence it needs to robustly defend itself.” This isn’t Trump’s only dodge. His attorneys are also fighting efforts to make Trump himself testify, to subpoena his children, and to look into his finances. Trump sued over what the BBC said about January 6, and now he’s fighting every attempt to examine what actually happened. There’s another problem for him. The BBC is funded by British taxpayers, so Trump can’t bully it into a hefty settlement or force it to back off its coverage the way he has with some American media companies. So now he has two choices: drop the case, or actually try to prove his point and live with the consequences. If Trump really believes he did nothing wrong on January 6, a deposition should be no problem. His lawyers’ desperation suggests otherwise. Please like and share if you can’t wait to hear what Jack Smith has to say if the BBC successfully gets him to testify!
121
3,061
63
9,426
263,877
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
We are past the point of political disagreement. We are witnessing a catastrophic collision between unchecked narcissism and obvious neurological decay. It is the most dangerous intersection in American history: a man with the absolute power of the Presidency and the absolute cognitive failure of a person no longer tethered to reality.
1,206
6,190
291
21,721
610,817
A.Ballerini ricorda le parole del Presidente Mattarella: "Verità e giustizia non devono prestarsi a compromessi. Sono a tutela non solo delle vittime e delle legittime aspettative di chiarezza dei familiari, ma presidio dei principi fondanti del nostro ordinamento costituzionale"
9
30
1
68
577
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
19 October 1931. John le Carré, one of the greatest spy novelists, was born in Poole. His 3rd novel, The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, became an international best-seller and was followed by others including Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Smiley’s People and The Constant Gardener.
2
25
3
121
9,855
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
Trump schuift nu zelfs de schuld voor het dieselprobleem in de VS in de schoenen van Zelensky. Een schaamteloze leugen om Oekraïne op te offeren voor politiek gewin. De VS worden gerund door criminelen. Wat een schofterige bende. Vervolg ze. Allemaal. open.spotify.com/episode/0fr…
348
237
21
1,257
21,235
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
🇮🇹🇺🇦 WOW! WHAT A SPEECH! WHAT POWERFUL WORDS FROM ITALIAN PRIME MINISTER GIORGIA MELONI! Here is the full five-minute excerpt of her speech devoted to Ukraine and Donald Trump. “Russia has launched a new autumn campaign against Ukraine. Unable to advance on the battlefield, Moscow has increasingly turned its attacks against civilians: power plants, residential buildings, hospitals, and even buses carrying people to work, as in the horrific massacre in Kramatorsk. This is a strategy through which Russia seeks to subjugate Ukraine with terror, cold, and darkness, simply because it has failed to conquer it on the battlefield. The facts contradict Kremlin propaganda and those who spread it here. Since the beginning of the year, Russia has captured very little territory, and in September it lost much of what it had previously seized. This halt did not happen by chance. It was achieved through Ukraine’s courage and Western support, including that of Italy. This resistance is the only effective instrument for bringing Russia to the negotiating table. I respect and understand the passionate debate on this issue, including within this chamber, because nobody here wants war. We all want peace. The difference lies in how we intend to achieve it. As I see it, supporting Ukraine is not an alternative to peace. It is what makes peace possible. Because if an aggressor expects its opponent to surrender, why would it negotiate? Surrender is not peace. It is conquest. If Ukraine stopped defending itself tomorrow, as many suggest, we would not have peace. We would be discussing the occupation of a European nation and the return of Soviet imperialism. Personally, I do not miss those times. I do not miss Russian tanks crushing uprisings in Prague and Budapest. I do not miss the Berlin Wall. And nobody will ever convince me that the surrender of those defending their freedom can be called ‘peace.’ The peace we want, and the peace we are working toward, even at the cost of concessions, is a just peace, because only a just peace can endure. Only a just peace can protect Europe and our interests. That is why our government's position remains unchanged: support for Ukraine, with particular attention to civilians, pressure on Moscow, and Euro-Atlantic unity remain the pillars of our actions. In this context, we must address Donald Trump's diesel agreement with Russia. This is a decision I consider extremely risky. Of course, we all recognize the need to contain fuel prices, which place a heavy burden on families, including Italian families. But we must understand that rising prices are primarily linked to the war in Iran, not Ukraine. Legitimizing Moscow, whose bombs continue to fall on Ukrainian cities, providing new revenues to finance the war, and weakening sanctions are all factors we cannot ignore. And they contradict everything Western nations, including the United States, have done to force Putin to the negotiating table. An energy ceasefire is a different matter, one that Italy supports, and we are grateful to President Zelenskyy for Ukraine's immediate willingness to agree to it. Now we expect Russia to stop attacking Ukraine's energy infrastructure. Finally, at such a difficult moment, when so many variables are beyond our control, there is at least one thing that depends on us: We must ensure that Europe does not simply stand by and watch, because the terms of peace will affect our continent and our security.” — Giorgia Meloni, Prime Minister of Italy
501
4,753
382
19,681
775,427
Sylvana de Backer retweeted
‘Hip nazisme’ ook
'Hippe islam' steeds aantrekkelijker voor progressieve jongeren: 'Het kan een lifefstylekeuze zijn' wnl.tv/2026/10/14/hippe-isla… #WNL
2
20
140
3,886