Award-winning Director/Producer & Creative Consultant. Inventor - GrassOmeter. AG whistleblower. LUKKO CREATIVE / LUKKO INVESTIGATES

Global
Joined February 2011
steven j lock retweeted
🔹It reaches into business failures, invalidly appointed receivers, unlawful property disposals, tainted loan sales, personal guarantees called in on foot of wholly invalid debts, destroyed credit histories and years of litigation destruction of mental health, marriages & families lives lost. 🔹Which raises the question I have been asking for years: 🔹How much “ordinary SME distress” was actually manufactured or materially aggravated by liabilities customers say they never knowingly assumed? 🔹I have a couple of decades of relevant experience in these products and by the time I raised serious concerns during the Banking Inquiry. 🔹My qualifications & experience - deemed “uniquely qualified” on hiring did not guarantee that technically difficult questions would be investigated. And they certainly did not protect the person raising them. 🔹So the test is not whether our Finance Minister has the same qualifications I do - it is whether he will obtain the expertise, understand the evidence, interrogate the banks and regulators, and ensure the hidden credit line scandal is properly investigated. 🔹Ireland may call itself a €600 billion economy. 🔹The more important question is: 🔹Do those charged with governing it understand what may still be buried underneath it? @kenoflynnTD @JMcGuinnessTD @johnmcdonnellMP @premnsikka @PearseDoherty @MaryLouMcDonald @Farrell_Mairead @Wftproof @stevemiddi1 @CarshaltonArt @SamanthaLaDuc @kshaughnessy2 @TedHarding11 @efgbricklayer @SimonHarrisTD @MichealMartinTD @HMcEntee @OCallaghanJim
3
8
1
20
591
steven j lock retweeted
🔹For every questionable non-performing loan (NPL), it seems to me that it is possible to reconstruct two timelines. 🔹Actual timeline Mortgage account → amount demanded → payments received → recorded arrears → NPL/default → provisioning → portfolio sale → purchaser recoveries. 🔹Then construct: Correct-account counterfactual Correct contractual balance → correct rate → correct payment → same actual borrower payments → hypothetical arrears position → hypothetical NPL status → hypothetical valuation. If the second timeline produces: no arrears, or materially smaller arrears, or no default, or a substantially higher asset valuation, then the classification and sale economics require explanation. That is the forensic test and this may expose a remarkable valuation issue Imagine: Book balance: €250,000 Recorded arrears: €30,000 Distressed portfolio valuation: €130,000 Purchaser ultimately receives: €225,000 But then forensic reconstruction shows that, absent lender-generated overcharging, 🔹genuine arrears at the transfer date would only have been €5,000. The question is no longer merely whether the borrower was overcharged (though this is why information is so critical). It becomes: ‼️Was an asset worth materially more on a correctly administered basis transferred at a price essentially influenced by a distressed classification that itself incorporated creditor-generated errors?‼️ That has implications potentially spanning: consumer protection, accounting, provisioning, loan-sale representations and warranties, portfolio valuation, tax, competition and ultimately State aid. 🔹The Central Bank’s own enforcement record provides the evidential bridge: 🔹we already know that lender misconduct resulted in incorrect rates, erroneous system treatment, overcharging and, in some cases, loss of homes. 🔹What has not been established & deserves rigorous investigation & is how many such defective accounts entered NPL datasets or loan-sale portfolios ‼️‼️BEFORE ‼️‼️their underlying causes were identified and corrected?
6
9
256
steven j lock retweeted
2/ 🔹No real interrogation of how a country that once built homes at scale, that had the land, the capital, the demographic pressure and the political mandate, managed to turn homeownership into a generational fantasy. 🔹No hard look at decades of planning paralysis, zoning capture, infrastructure bottlenecks, immigration without corresponding housing supply, tax & regulatory incentives that rewarded speculation over construction, or a political class that treated housing as a political football rather than a national emergency. 🔹Just the usual & rather depressing soft framing: “the housing crisis continues,” some bank-sponsored survey stats, and a quiet acceptance that younger people should lower their expectations and queue social housing. 🔹A large percentage of an entire generation is locked out of the most basic marker of adult independence. 🔹The numbers are damning. 🔹And the people responsible for this managed decline still get to talk about “challenges” instead of failure. @JMcGuinnessTD @kenoflynnTD
1
14
37
398
steven j lock retweeted
Tim Hannon used Transport for Ireland's own real-time tracking data to expose Bus Éireann's PSO-funded shadow fleet. This diversion of ring-fenced public assets to commercial services is one of the biggest ever illegal state-aid scandals in Ireland. villagemagazine.ie/the-e1-2-…
3
24
2
33
4,321
steven j lock retweeted
1/ ‼️I received an advance copy of David Morrissey’s book “Without Prejudice” last night. I read the account of a May 2016 hearing under Judge Griffin in the Circuit Court with particular attention & what it records is not an unfortunate misunderstanding….👇‼️
2
14
1
42
923
steven j lock retweeted
1/ ☘️Simplification ☘️ 🔹Most people think: “I took out a mortgage with Bank X. I pay Bank X. That’s it.” 🔹When your mortgage gets securitised, that’s no longer the full story - (despite what certain judges may tell you). 🔹Behind the scenes, your loan (and thousands of others) has been packaged up and sold to investors as notes/bonds. 🔹Those investors expect a certain return — a minimum yield. 🔹The legal paperwork that sets this up (which you have not seen) is full of hidden mechanisms designed to make sure those investors get paid what they were promised. 🔹And the money comes from you!
5
24
2
56
1,496
steven j lock retweeted
👇👇👇
4
24
1
61
1,779
Replying to @alomohan
Alo Mohan’s story and his exposure of the multimillion-euro chicken VAT scam should concern every person in Ireland. When suspected VAT abuse is allowed to continue, it is the Irish taxpayer who ultimately carries the cost. That is money that could have supported healthcare, housing, education and other essential public services. Alo persisted for years despite the enormous personal impact on him and his family. His experience shows why whistleblowers must be protected, their disclosures independently investigated and those responsible for wrongdoing held accountable. Whistleblowers such as Alo protect the public interest. They should never be left to stand alone. #AloMohan #VATScam #ProtectWhistleblowers #TaxJustice #Accountability
1
7
11
312
Dear Minister @CarrollJennifer Over the weekend, I was reviewing my 2021 Subject Access Request from the Department of Health, @roinnslainte Record 11 shows that senior officials within the HSE @HSELive and the Department of Health were discussing the Protected Disclosure made by my colleagues and me and were seeking updates on how it was being handled. The correspondence demonstrates that our concerns were being considered at senior levels and that officials were communicating about the progress of the matter. SAR2021-11 Record 11 My colleagues and I made our Protected Disclosure because we believed the issues we raised were serious, in the public interest and deserved independent consideration. Unfortunately, despite these discussions taking place behind the scenes, neither my colleagues nor I were contacted or kept informed. We were not given the courtesy of being updated on what, if any, action had been taken in response to our Protected Disclosure. Reading Record 11 has reinforced for me the importance of Subject Access Requests. Without exercising my rights under data protection legislation, I would never have known that these discussions had taken place. Whistleblowers should not have to rely on Subject Access Requests to discover how their protected disclosures were handled. Transparency, accountability and meaningful communication with those who speak up in the public interest are essential if confidence in the system is to be maintained.
1
23
49
1,262
steven j lock retweeted
The past few days have been difficult days, spent speaking with victims of Ulster Bank and other Irish financial institutions & foreign vultures, who have been left in financial ruin. Noting @SimonHarrisTD was speaking this week at the European Anti-Financial Crime Summit in Dublin; I want to assess his interest in criminality engaged in by financial institutions against their own customers. Before issuing further updates, I am awaiting supporting evidence to substantiate further detailed accounts, which point to the deliberate destruction in Ireland of otherwise viable businesses. Ireland is simply not a functioning democracy and the issues involved in these financial crimes are not as complex as some would suggest and should be easily understood by any EU Minister for Finance. @SimonHarrisTD - can you as Ireland’s Minister for Finance assess below conduct in light of your recent self disclosed interest in preventing financial crime? 🔹Ulster Bank, a foreign-owned bank operating within the Irish State, supported by the same RBS/NatWest structures that operated GRG in the UK, embedded undisclosed credit lines within Irish SME lending. These facilities were concealed behind “all monies” charges over both business and personal assets. Customers were not informed that a line of credit was linked to their swap or fixed-rate loan. They were not advised how such mechanisms could inflate loan-to-value ratios, impair credit ratings and essentially transfer the bank’s own risk exposure directly onto them. Reread - banks passed their risks to customers. Critically, these hidden credit lines operated as internal “buffers” for the bank, artificially enhancing its secured position while simultaneously deteriorating the customer’s financial standing.  In effect, the bank strengthened its balance sheet and risk metrics at the direct expense of the borrower and to be direct - this was not a neutral feature of complex lending. It was a profit-generating mechanism. [The same principle applies in the mortgage market - rampant overcharging & artificially engineered defaults]. As these undisclosed facilities inflated exposures and triggered breaches, customers were pushed into distress, default and supposed restructuring. That artificially created distress, in turn, enabled the bank to extract additional margin, fees, break costs, and enforcement recoveries. The bank produced windfall gains from structures the customer neither understood nor consented to. The so-called “restructuring” operated asset-stripping mechanisms rather than providing a genuine support function. At the same time, the bank’s internal position was further reinforced through these hidden credit buffers. The consequences to customers were severe, such as the, 🔹complete erosion of financial stability, 🔹loss of stable family structures, 🔹unwarranted reputational damage & ultimately 🔹the loss of homes & 🔹loss of lives All driven by internal bank calculations that borrowers neither saw nor understood. @Wftproof @WinkSabee @stevemiddi1 @johnmcdonnellMP @MichealMartinTD @Farrell_Mairead @PearseDoherty @JMcGuinnessTD @kenoflynnTD @EoinLenihan @RealEddieHobbs @kshaughnessy2 @SamanthaLaDuc @BlowersIreland @NickDelahanty @nw_nicholas @MaryLouMcDonald
11
45
2
213
196,340
steven j lock retweeted
#postofficescandal @Wftproof 👇 🔹The claim that around 11,400 sub-postmasters suddenly began pocketing money from their tills is statistically implausible and bordering on impossible, given the scale of the discrepancies. 🔹For 11,400 independent operators, spread across thousands of UK locations, to simultaneously commit theft at rates high enough to trigger prosecutions (hundreds convicted) defies probability. 🔹Sub-postmasters apparently operated on thin margins (often £10,000-20,000 yearly profit), facing personal liability for shortfalls, making mass self-sabotage completely illogical. 🔹Similarly, Hester Bais & myself - both recognised senior lawyers in capital markets and derivatives with impeccable careers spanning decades, would never plausibly self-sabotage by fabricating disclosures, after achieving such professional success. 🔹Hester Bais founded Bais Legal in 2010, specialising in Dutch financial law, derivatives trading, compliance and collateral management. Prior roles include legal advisor and compliance officer at ING Bank, Dutch regulator AFM, Euronext Amsterdam, LCH.Clearnet, and Euroclear, with landmark litigation wins against ING on interest rate swap “mis-selling” up to the Supreme Court in the Netherlands. 🔹Meanwhile, I qualified in Ireland, England & Wales, and New York - 6 years plus as Attorney in Paribas, New York - then Head of Legal at Bank of Ireland Global Markets - then established L. Morris Legal in 2003, serving global clients such as Citibank, GE Financial Markets, UBS AG, Standard Chartered (& of course anchor client Bank of Ireland) - specifically in derivatives contracts. Later hired by client to become Lead Counsel GE Financial Markets. Then headhunted at behest of General Counsel of @centralbank_ie for Expert role at Irish Banking Inquiry. 🔹Hester & I met by chance at a Dublin conference populated by victims of bank fraud - Hester, a speaker on her book #WorstBankScenario - co-authored with @WinkSabee. 🔹Professionals of the stature of Hester and I - with proven track records (& similarly to sub postmasters) face absolutely zero incentive for career-ending “fabrication”. 🔹The invention of disclosures would dismantle decades of reputation, built on consistently delivering results for major institutions and in Hester’s case - also in landmark litigation - evidenced in numerous testimonials and references. 🔹It is statistically and psychologically absurd, given our previous career successes. 🔹We are facing intense pushback precisely because of our ANTI-FRAUD stance & advocacy as it strikes at the heart of entrenched financial misconduct; 🔹We are jointly exposing how banks weaponised & continue to weaponise hidden credit lines to systematically destroy SMEs and entrepreneurs. It forms part of wider fraudulent activities. 🔹Resistance manifests as regulatory stonewalling, media marginalisation and legal harassment - the standard playbook against whistleblowers unmasking systemic fraud. 🔹Yet our unblemished careers and aligned disclosures (with Horizon-scale improbabilities) validate our stance: 🔹We did not endure decades building our reputations just to “invent” matters that now happen to align across several jurisdictions. 🔹The harder the pushback, the more it signals that we are “hitting the rot”. Everyone should be concerned about what has been uncovered and doubly concerned for future generations. The articles by @jameshurley in UK times yesterday & today apply to all Ulster Bank & SME victims in Ireland as the mechanisms were to be rolled out across the RBS Group. @stevemiddi1 @BankConfidenti1 @CarshaltonArt @winnertakesall3 @efgbricklayer @PMJAudits @andyverity @MarkLTighe @ArthurBeesley @rtenews @kshaughnessy2 @SamanthaLaDuc @WinkSabee @kenoflynnTD @Farrell_Mairead @PearseDoherty @MaryLouMcDonald @irldefrauded @BlowersIreland @IrishSecondary @SimonHarrisTD @MichealMartinTD @RNW_MITCHELL
2
18
2
24
2,123
steven j lock retweeted
🔹IMPORTANT🔹 I have been inundated with messages from defrauded borrowers. Also, my posts about the conduct of certain barristers, solicitors and judges has struck an immense chord. Questions: How many 🔹Tracker Mortgages🔹 in Ireland were inappropriately excluded and deemed out of scope from the 🔹Tracker Mortgage Examination🔹, by utterly conflicted individuals? What I mean by that is by “complaint handlers” within the very banks so determined to avoid their significant liabilities? How many 🔹Tracker Mortgages🔹 were unlawfully “converted” into a discretionary product to bring in additional revenue and to make the unlawfully converted product more palatable to be securitised & to bring much needed liquidity to the bank? How many of these dubious products that have been converted into “income streams” & now been offloaded on to credit servicers - who are tasked with pushing for repossession orders against borrowers artificially engineered into default? How many solicitors and barristers have been intimidated into dropping legitimate cases in which these issues have been - or are being raised by defrauded borrowers? How many legal professionals are sitting on hundreds of thousands of euros in fees that they have not earned, yet will not return? [Gain a conscience - if you’ve neutralised litigation and not achieved anything for your client, please return the unearned fees - no questions asked]. How many judges issued repossession orders on tens of thousands of borrowers who were simply not in default at all - when in fact the banks owed & still owe the borrowers money - essentially to fulfil Ireland’s treacherous promises to US private equity funds? #EpsteinFiles Why? What did you gain in return? Debt forgiveness? How many parliamentarians know about this scandal & have not managed to resolve at any level or to hold the banks & the neutralised @centralbank_ie to account? How many truly understand the relentless mental suffering that is ongoing for borrowers who have been defrauded by banks, who have been repossessed against, who face eviction or have been evicted- when essentially their financial circumstances never really changed? Who influenced @rte @rtepolitics @rtenews to bury the evidence about this ongoing scandal - when it recently aired its Prime Time documentary about tracker mortgages? This crumbling system is relying upon the silence of borrowers, when it is the act of speaking up that will shine a light on these very dark practices. Please share information here publicly or alternatively, my DMs are open. Please repost to spread awareness. @Wftproof @WinkSabee @LSRAIreland @LawSocIreland @TheBarofIreland @LFJIreland @JMcGuinnessTD @Farrell_Mairead @PearseDoherty @jackfchambers @kenoflynnTD @centralbank_ie @MaryLouMcDonald @ivanabacik @HollyCairnsTD @TransparencyTF @stevemiddi1 @BankConfidenti1 @BlowersIreland @NoelMcgree @SamanthaLaDuc @EoinLenihan @jemmm85517813 @indepdubnrth @OTURISK
4
64
2
94
3,459
steven j lock retweeted
Chris Mason’s inadvertently revealing @BBC piece on Starmer’s “dire” predicament is textbook Westminster insider journalism: mood, metaphor, anonymous sourcing, and ticking-clock drama frame the PM as uniquely exposed after McSweeney’s resignation. McSweeney is lionised as the indispensable technocratic operator who “got us here,” delivered the #GE2024 landslide and acted as a protective “lightning conductor.” Starmer, by contrast, is subtly diminished as a late entrant who “travels light ideologically” (code for thin conviction and over-reliance on elite machinery rather than political depth or vision). The implied tragedy is not governing failure, but the squandering of electoral success through personal misjudgement and the loss of sharp operatives. Crisis is then ratcheted up through doom-laden language, dramatic metaphors and a manufactured sense of unanimity, turning insider anxiety into an apparent party-wide verdict of impending collapse. Countervailing facts such as Starmer’s mandate, his resolve, and international standing are briefly acknowledged, then sidelined, overwhelmed by a narrative in which politics becomes Westminster soap opera: elite missteps, personalities and parliamentary mechanics crowd out policy substance or structural constraints. Perhaps most revealing are the omissions. There is almost no engagement with governing choices, no serious attempt to explain why the Mandelson appointment angered people beyond optics, no mention of Palantir contracts, and no analysis of whether any of this turbulence matters outside SW1. Power is reduced to position and atmosphere among elites, with the public cast as a passive audience simply reacting to Westminster drama. Most strikingly, Mason never even mentions #Epstein. By reducing the Mandelson controversy to vague “misjudgement” and “lies,” the article depoliticises a global scandal about elite networks, vetting, and sexual abuse, reframing it instead as an internal mood crisis and a test of Starmer’s personal resilience. All this while maintaining @BBC surface impartiality. The relentless focus on insider sentiment and technocratic competence privileges Westminster drama over governing substance, reinforcing perceptions of Starmer’s fragility rather than neutrally observing them. Politics, in this telling, has fuck-all to do with issues that shape our lives, such as inequality, migration, media power, housing, the cost of living, taxation, or public services. It is reduced to something that happens primarily among elites, which the public then reacts to later. From the perspective of the Masons, Kuennssbergs, Pestons and Rigbys of this world, ‘the political is personnel’. Whereas second-wave feminism insisted that the ‘personal is political’ (that lived experience reveals underlying structures of power requiring collective solutions) my inverted aphorism names a different reality: politics is interpreted through individual competence, appointments, and elite manoeuvring, while the structural forces shaping people’s lives are relegated to background noise. This reflects the deeper victory of a neoliberal rationality that privileges competitive individualism and elite managerial skill over collective solidarity, structural explanation, and shared purpose. Westminster journalism doesn’t just report this worldview, it helps manufacture and sustain it, rendering structural politics unintelligible and collective alternatives invisible, while elite personalities and appointments pass for politics itself. #Starmer #Mandelson #EpsteinFiles #Palantir bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3g…
56
221
31
630
68,158
steven j lock retweeted
👇A joint UK-Ireland probe is warranted, particularly given the use of hidden credit lines by Ulster Bank under the direction/ supervision of RBS. This “shadow system” demands sunlight: parliamentary committees like Ireland’s Public Accounts / Finance and UK’s Treasury Select should immediately subpoena files. The significant protected disclosures made by me in 2015, while serving as an expert on the Irish Banking Inquiry were entirely dismissed by Mr Justice Senan Allen - clearly under orders. Two were substantiated shortly after publication of Allen’s fabricated report and this confirmed in a sworn (unrebutted) affidavit. Allen refused to come forward. Meanwhile, I was offered an extension to my contract 8 weeks POST publication of the fabricated report (despite Allen’s false assessment of my unreliability, crafted to deflect attention from my myriad disclosures). Prior to Allen’s review, I was offered a role to investigate events leading to the issuance of the Irish Bank Guarantee in Sept 2008. It’s very encouraging that a spotlight is now being shone on the extraordinary leaking of sensitive information - directly from the former UK Business Secretary Mandelson to Wall Street titans. I understand that a criminal probe is also underway. All of this means that Britain’s and Ireland’s publics now urgently require scrutiny of how cross-border banking elites have shaped post-crisis asset fire sales in both countries. Grave concerns remain that assets were / are being pursued in Irish courts on foot of contracts with references to collateral serving merely as illusory or pretextual assurances, without any enforceable substance. @Wftproof @stevemiddi1 @BankConfidenti1 @kenoflynnTD @JMcGuinnessTD @Farrell_Mairead @jemmm85517813 @EoinLenihan
#PostOfficeScandal #Mandelson #MandelsonEpstein #Epstein #RoyalMail The Epstein Files just revealed something explosive about how UK State Assets were sold. On June 13, 2009, Business Secretary Peter Mandelson forwarded a confidential Government memo to Jeffrey Epstein listing £20 BILLION in State Assets the Labour Goverment planned to sell. Including Royal Mail—for which Private Equity firm CVC had just bid £2 Billion for a 30% stake. Let that sink in: While Parliament debated Royal Mail's future in June 2009, while Unions prepared to strike, while Labour MPs revolted, Mandelson was feeding Britain's privatisation playbook to a convicted sex trafficker with direct lines to JPMorgan and Wall Street's biggest Private Equity firms and Hedge Funds. This is how modern corruption works. No briefcases or brown paper bags stuffed with cash. No crude traceable bribes. Just Panamanian Shell Companies, Dinner parties with Royals and Academics, yacht trips, young girls and boys, "Advisory Roles," and confidential Government memos forwarded to financiers who trade on information asymmetry. The insiders know. The public pay. This leaking of State secrets wasn't a one-off error of judgement by Mandelson. 👉August 2009: Mandelson sends Epstein another confidential memo warning about Trillions in Bank refinancing debt 👉December 2009: He advises JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon to "mildly threaten" the Chancellor over a proposed Banker Bonus tax January 2010: JPMorgan's Jes Staley emails Epstein about acquiring RBS Assets—right after meeting Mandelson in Davos. The Royal Mail deal collapsed in July 2009. Official reason? "Market conditions." Real reason? Private Equity firm CVC Capital's £2 Billion offer was too low, Brussels threatened to challenge the Pension Liability write off , and Labour backbenchers made passage impossible. When Royal Mail was finally floated in 2013, it was widely criticised as undervalued and a "fire sale"—costing taxpayers hundreds of Millions. Advising the Goverment on this State Asset Sale and many others - Lazard Bank who Mandelson joined in 2011 as a 'Special Adviser' and went on to become Chair of their International arm. The questions that should haunt us: ⚖️How many other deals were shaped by this 'shadow system'? ⚖️How many Government memos reached Epstein's inbox—and from there to Wall Street trading desks? ⚖️How many Billions in public value were sacrificed because insiders knew what outsiders could only guess? EVERY STATE ASSET SALE FROM THIS PERIOD MUST BE REVIEWED starting with RBS Sempra. Britain's democracy requires sunlight. What the Epstein files reveal is that for years, the most important economic decisions were made in the dark—by those who viewed Public Office as opportunity for private profit. The British public deserves to know who really governs their country. And in whose interest. @DanNeidle @CommonsTreasury @CommonsBTC @CommonsPAC @HouseofCommons @UKHouseofLords @premnsikka @andyverity @Cyclefree2 @TimBushLondon
4
34
1
47
2,531
steven j lock retweeted
If it was not for the bravery of moral individuals who stand up to corruption of this state, no one would ever know. Yet these same individuals are destroyed for doing what few are brave enough to do. Grace , cervical cancer, Garda corruption, banking and prison scandals. @NoelMcgree @AnybodyButBerti @MLorrM @Default69202648 @Gardawhistlebl1 #vatgate #HowIrelandWorks
2
11
32
947
steven j lock retweeted
This is the radicalised mass base of Reform and the Tories - wearing our country's flag as a badge of white identity. Learn the lessons of the 1930s - to defeat them needs a militant democracy, radical change and a narrative of hope ✊🚩
6,303
906
559
5,951
2,208,942
steven j lock retweeted
This Banksy, which appeared overnight on the side of the Royal Courts of Justice building in London, is extremely powerful.
1,696
27,099
1,385
134,517
26,730,211
VAT is the most efficient, neutral, pro-growth, tax. Yes, it can also be regressive, but in many countries - and all developed countries - there are known ways of overcoming this. So why do so many countries apply exemptions? Not for equity reasons; but for political economy ones
12
31
5
135
20,062
steven j lock retweeted
The Garda commissioner requested a superintend to investigate issues of fraud that was brought to his attention. The superintend stated it didn’t matter what evidence we had he would show it to be legal. We wrote back into the superintend and the garda commissioner stating three possible conclusions. 1-the superintendent was corrupt. 2- the superintendent was inept. 3- or a combination of both. We never head back , According to the superintendent that false invoicing and false accounting is legal. The deception which results in insurance and tax fraud is legal. That extortion and incitement is also legal. #vatgate #HowIrelandworks
White-collar crime files were not passed on to DPP by corporate watchdog, detective garda claims buff.ly/KlOIrfL
1
19
18
1,215