arnav retweeted
I recently spent some time with former colleagues from academia. All of them brilliant, peak human capital. Almost all of them fundamentally unable to plug into the economy, inoculated against productivity by a youth spent experimenting in laboratories instead of building wealth for society. Dealing with real people in the real world.
90% of them have left academia in the last 10-15 years, and 90% of those are functionally unemployed. Grad school does a lousy job of training scientists to be professors (since most of them don't get the good postdoc or tenure track position) and an even worse job of preparing people for real life.
We complain that our societal infrastructure is collapsing, our state capacity is low, our incumbent industries are faltering. Where are the next generation of leaders that can push us forward?
A huge fraction of them were conveyor-belted into academia by schooling systems that have no mechanism to channel ambition and 99+%ile competence, and our universities are mostly hedge funds with glorified psych wards/academic departments on the side, running an insane pyramid scheme that exists only to prove, over and over again, the Shirky Principle: Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.
We literally poured trillions of dollars into state-funded research and effectively neutered our elite civilian technical leadership development programs.
I recently asked a few academic friends if they were finding AI useful in accelerating their programs of research. You know, to solve the Big Problem their entire field exists to solve?
Some were. But most were complaining about how it created pedagogical issues, explaining how their department decided to ban the use of AI, or how it took 18 months to approve an enterprise account, or how they tried Gemini 2 on a puzzle a year ago and it wasn't very helpful, or repeating nonsense about datacenters and water consumption, or supposed IP theft by model companies, as though that has any bearing on their ability to, eg, accelerate a cure for cancer.
Elon sometimes calls AI a supersonic tsunami - a huge wave you don't see coming. I see it coming. But even the people who you'd think have been waiting for this their entire careers are steadfastly looking in the other direction.
arnav retweeted
One day it will be recognised that our mood is one way that we pollute the commons; that feelings are not private; that we have a responsibility to the commons & each other to cultivate joy & not be in a gigantic sulk at life all the time. its like defecating in the town water
to build a cool product now, you really only need two ppl:
one dude with exceptional vision & taste who knows what should exist & can provide the right feedback loops for iteration.
& one dude who is absolutely relentless about making it real no matter what.
that’s it. & sometimes these two are the same.
arnav retweeted
I mildly think that startups should keep a roll-up vehicle around and take as many $5k checks from engineers/etc as people want to offer.
This is less about the money and more like “Why yes we *do* accept superfans.”
(Plausible recruiting targets even if not today, etc etc.)
Average engineer angel investing experience:
"Hey, I really like your company, can I put in $5k into your seed?"
"Sorry, we're trying to keep the cap table tight - but we'd love to recruit you as a founding engineer"
"Sorry I don't like your company that much"
my counterargument to immortality is that some mindsets are so ingrained in people that require many many decades to change.
for example, internalizing the post-abundance world we live in practice by leaving your house lights on and leaving your faucet running excessively is a macro environment that you either had to be born into or had 20+ years to let influence you.
people, especially older people, are unaware of how much inefficiencies they live with that were needed when they were younger but aren’t needed now because society progressed past it. (natural) death is the engine of progress.
arnav retweeted
Replying to @SpaceKoala
The entire logic that being more ignorant is better is bad. The problem with doctors over-treating when given more data is a problem with doctor ignorance. I hate the entire thing, & I distrust intelligence of anyone who takes it seriously, tbh. Ignorance is not a solution.
arnav retweeted
this will change medicine forever
bringing quick and easy preventive full body scans to the masses is about the highest utility technology for human welfare
they may not have cured cancer, but detecting every tumor within a month of it being half a millimeter is pretty close
arnav retweeted
imagine telling your customers there's a small chance you'll randomly decide they're using your product wrong and you won't tell them but will secretly silently sabotage their work
how can i make this production environment 10x more dangerous?
i wake up and take a shower (humanoid pouring buckets of water on my head) and have breakfast at my dining table (pile of planking humanoids) in my comfy chair (humanoid in squat position) before going to work in my car (humanoid sprinting while carrying me in its arms) where i
Don't you have a haptic chair for VR gaming? Don't worry, your friendly humanoid robot can help you with that!
In a recent research paper from the University of Colorado, researchers experimented with using a humanoid robot to literally grab your chair and move it during VR racing sessions to make the game more realistic. And from the users' feedback, it seemed to work.
I guess they took inspiration from those viral videos, where in some low-budget arcades, the owner literally moved the station with his own hands.
I can't wait for the fail videos caused by this technology...
Full video is available here: youtube.com/watch?v=ggsCDhQv…
#VirtualReality #VR #technology






















