Francesco Starace retweeted
Romania’s #SMR #nuclear project with #NuScale hits deadlock as 80% of conditions are not met.
romania-insider.com/business…
Francesco Starace retweeted
🚨🪖🇮🇹🇷🇺 Guido Crosetto, ministro della Difesa italiano: "Io voglio partire dal presupposto che nessuna nazione sia nemica di nessuna. Poi però sono costretto, perché faccio il ministro della Difesa, non faccio il commentatore da bar, a cercare di circoscrivere ogni pericolo che possa riguardare la mia nazione e guardo i fatti. Ogni giorno noi subiamo centinaia di attacchi cyber alle nostre infrastrutture di ogni tipo, civili e militari. La gran parte di questi attacchi vengono da due nazioni: la Russia e la Cina. Ogni giorno noi subiamo sui nostri social, e su altri canali, tentativi di disinformazione e di indebolimento dell'opinione pubblica. E questi arrivano dalle stesse due nazioni. Più Russia o più Cina? Più Russia, che ha una storica presenza in Italia, non soltanto attraverso i nuovi strumenti. Perché la Russia è presente in Italia dal dopo la Seconda Guerra Mondiale, attraverso i suoi servizi, in modo superiore a qualunque altra nazione, anche perché aveva un humus di penetrazione superiore a qualunque altra nazione. Noi diamo anche per scontato che non ci possa essere un carro armato russo, anche perché prima dovrebbe attraversare un po' di stati e le Alpi per arrivare qua. Ma dall'altra parte io vedo un atteggiamento di ostilità. Allora, nessuno è di parte, ma secondo voi la NATO, le nazioni della NATO, noi, UK, Francia, Stati Uniti, chiunque sia il presidente, potrebbero mai decidere di invadere la Russia? Cioè, secondo voi un parlamento occidentale di qualunque di queste nazioni approverebbe mai un'invasione della Russia? No. Il racconto in Russia è che la NATO sta circondando la Russia per invaderla e che la Russia sta reclutando centinaia di migliaia di soldati - sono arrivati a un milione e mezzo - per difendersi da un'invasione della NATO. Siccome i russi non sono scemi, sono analisti molto più profondi di noi, sanno perfettamente che la NATO non invaderà mai la Russia. Chiediamoci perché hanno trasformato il 50% della loro economia in un'economia di guerra da cui sarà difficile tornare indietro? Questa è una preoccupazione. E hanno raggiunto il milione e mezzo di soldati reclutati dopo aver perso sul fronte Ucraina ogni mese più di 30.000 giovani. Perché la Russia il prezzo che sta pagando per andare avanti in Ucraina sono 30.000 tra morti e feriti ogni mese. Quindi perché questo atteggiamento? Non lo so. Non voglio dare una risposta che in qualche modo sia allarmistica. So che devo però preoccuparmi di fronte a un atteggiamento di questo tipo".
xitter.cf/dariodangelo91/status/…
🚨🚨🚨🛢️🪖🇺🇦🇺🇸🇷🇺 Il grande inganno della Casa Bianca, il retroscena di settembre, la vera (e più pericolosa) conseguenza politica dell'accordo Trump-Putin. E poi lo shock respirato fino all'alba di oggi in via Bankova. L'orgoglio e la primissima reazione di Kyiv. Il timore che nessuno può permettersi di sottovalutare.
Tanti retroscena. E ancora più lettori in questi minuti sul Blog, per uno dei pezzi più difficili da scrivere degli ultimi mesi. Grazie davvero a tutti.
xitter.cf/dariodangelo91/status/…
Francesco Starace retweeted
¿Cómo se convirtió Chile en pionero mundial en la protección de neuroderechos? 🧠🇨🇱
El avance de la inteligencia artificial y las tecnologías neuronales nos enfrenta a una frontera inédita: la necesidad de defender los límites de la mente humana.
No se trata únicamente de avances científicos o regulación de datos tradicionales. Hablamos de preservar los pilares sobre los que se sostiene la convivencia humana: la libertad de pensamiento, la capacidad de empatizar sin filtros algorítmicos y la salud de nuestras democracias.
Desde Chile abrimos este camino al impulsar los neuroderechos, pero la tarea en EmpoderaLIVE! en Málaga con @EMPODERA_org fue recordar que este compromiso debe ser global. Si no definimos hoy los límites éticos de la tecnología, corremos el riesgo de ceder la última frontera de nuestra libertad.
Puedes ver la charla completa en este link [youtube.com/watch?v=VlLtGRkw…]
#IA #Neuroderechos #Tecnología #Chile #España
Francesco Starace retweeted
Time is now to seize the momentum, cutting 🇪🇺 EU dependencies on energy, finance, security. We definitely know we can only count on ourselves, so let’s complete the Single Market, let’s scale from 27 to 1, let’s implement One Europe One Market. @DelorsInstitute #CSFPrishtina2026
Francesco Starace retweeted
The distributed solar power boom in Pakistan and the Philippines is driving down the need for fossil-powered electricity.
Solar is "gradually reducing the market share and operating hours of fossil fuel plants” says Ember's Alnie Demoral via Bloomberg.
bloomberg.com/news/features/…
Francesco Starace retweeted
BIG NEWS: Up to 75% of global energy demand could be electrified by 2050 with technologies we already have.
Progress is slow & barriers are mostly political and institutional.
Today we launch the Oxford Martin Electrification Accelerator to change that.
oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/electr…
Francesco Starace retweeted
What is an electrostate? The word has found its way into the international energy vocabulary. The Financial Times, Forbes, Ember and Carnegie all use it. But it is rarely defined.
I went through the reports and papers to unpack it & found 4 dimensions.
janrosenow.substack.com/p/wh…
Francesco Starace retweeted
My favourite chart from the @IEA special report on electrification. Electricity is only 23% of Final Energy (No big deal), but it's 37% of Useful Energy (What?) and delivers 46% of GDP (Wow!) And it's going clean, fast. Still think there's no transition?
iea.blob.core.windows.net/as…
Francesco Starace retweeted
China's diesel consumption fell ~12% in H1 2026.
Gasoline demand dropped ~8%.
EV truck sales grow faster than EV auto sales in China!
US diesel truck pays ~$101 to go 200 kilometers, while an EV truck in China pays $21!
Energy security drives EV.
bloomberg.com/news/features/…
Francesco Starace retweeted
Esta juventud me pone la piel de gallina, valiente y muy preparado. Así, tan bien explicado se podrá decir en breve que el Fascismo fue abolido en España.
Ojalá miles como él.
Francesco Starace retweeted
Esta gente hoy incapacitada por la bilis que baña su cerebro, que no admite que incluso el reloj averiado da bien la hora 2 veces al día, no puede aceptar que Sánchez pronunció uno de los mejores discursos que se han dado en nombre de España en décadas.
Francesco Starace retweeted
Realky: Listen to it. Phenomenal.
Pope Leo XIV at UNESCO asks “what does it mean to be human?”
Watch and listen to the Pope’s magnificent reflection:
“What does it mean to be human? Every culture is challenged by this question, which lies at the heart of every form of knowledge, every art and every religion. Even in the twenty-first century, after all, we cannot take for granted that we know who the human person is or what it means to live as a human being. Indeed, every generation is called to grapple with this question, especially in the face of tragedies that, regrettably, occur even today.
Before all else, the human person is someone who is conceived and born. Thus, first of all, to be human means to be a child. None of us chose to be so. None of us decided from whom, when or where to be born. This evident truth sheds light on something that is not merely biological but ethical: as children, we are all brothers and sisters. From the outset, our humanity is a gift and a trial, a promise and a responsibility. For every human being, birth establishes a primordial bond — a communion of life that has its source, and its first educational setting, in the family.
Secondly, we are all born naked and in need. We are poor by birth, in need of bread and words, of care and affection — that is, of all that nourishes body and spirit. We know this well, and yet, as we become adults, we risk forgetting it. It is precisely those in need who suffer the greatest consequences of this forgetfulness, whenever their humanity is betrayed or cast aside, exploited or deceived. Forgetting the circumstances of our birth obscures the very idea of human life, because it detaches life from the history common to us all. Thus, life is no longer understood as a gift, but as a commodity. It is no longer viewed as a summons to care and responsibility, but as a product to be exploited. Indeed, this tragic alternative reminds us that to be human is to be free by nature. Since all of us have been children, our freedom begins with our response to the freedom of the one who first turns to us — whether with gestures of affection or rejection, of loving welcome or neglect and cruelty.
Thirdly, to keep alive the memory of our common humanity is to recognize its grandeur — that is, its immense potential — even though it is diminished by many forms of evil and injustice. Those engaged in the fields of education, science and culture are called all the more to care for every person, so that the beauty of our freedom may shine forth. This beauty has a name: justice. Freedom is indeed beautiful when it is oriented toward goodness and truth; it is disfigured when it descends into arbitrariness, violence or the thirst for power. To be human, then, implies a responsibility before history: the human being is one who grows, learns and works with both hands and mind. By that labor, we may cultivate the earth or disfigure it, create works of art or destroy them. At this particular juncture, we must recognize that the most terrible of “human works” is war, for then science itself is placed at the service of an inhumane will to destroy and to kill.”
Francesco Starace retweeted
Pope Leo XIV at UNESCO asks “what does it mean to be human?”
Watch and listen to the Pope’s magnificent reflection:
“What does it mean to be human? Every culture is challenged by this question, which lies at the heart of every form of knowledge, every art and every religion. Even in the twenty-first century, after all, we cannot take for granted that we know who the human person is or what it means to live as a human being. Indeed, every generation is called to grapple with this question, especially in the face of tragedies that, regrettably, occur even today.
Before all else, the human person is someone who is conceived and born. Thus, first of all, to be human means to be a child. None of us chose to be so. None of us decided from whom, when or where to be born. This evident truth sheds light on something that is not merely biological but ethical: as children, we are all brothers and sisters. From the outset, our humanity is a gift and a trial, a promise and a responsibility. For every human being, birth establishes a primordial bond — a communion of life that has its source, and its first educational setting, in the family.
Secondly, we are all born naked and in need. We are poor by birth, in need of bread and words, of care and affection — that is, of all that nourishes body and spirit. We know this well, and yet, as we become adults, we risk forgetting it. It is precisely those in need who suffer the greatest consequences of this forgetfulness, whenever their humanity is betrayed or cast aside, exploited or deceived. Forgetting the circumstances of our birth obscures the very idea of human life, because it detaches life from the history common to us all. Thus, life is no longer understood as a gift, but as a commodity. It is no longer viewed as a summons to care and responsibility, but as a product to be exploited. Indeed, this tragic alternative reminds us that to be human is to be free by nature. Since all of us have been children, our freedom begins with our response to the freedom of the one who first turns to us — whether with gestures of affection or rejection, of loving welcome or neglect and cruelty.
Thirdly, to keep alive the memory of our common humanity is to recognize its grandeur — that is, its immense potential — even though it is diminished by many forms of evil and injustice. Those engaged in the fields of education, science and culture are called all the more to care for every person, so that the beauty of our freedom may shine forth. This beauty has a name: justice. Freedom is indeed beautiful when it is oriented toward goodness and truth; it is disfigured when it descends into arbitrariness, violence or the thirst for power. To be human, then, implies a responsibility before history: the human being is one who grows, learns and works with both hands and mind. By that labor, we may cultivate the earth or disfigure it, create works of art or destroy them. At this particular juncture, we must recognize that the most terrible of “human works” is war, for then science itself is placed at the service of an inhumane will to destroy and to kill.”
Francesco Starace retweeted
In 1985, Carl Sagan sat in front of the United States Senate and described the weather of 2026.
Not as prediction. As physics.
Sitting across from him was a junior senator named Al Gore — who would later win the Nobel Prize, the Oscar, and build a climate investment fund worth over $36 billion repeating almost word for word what Sagan said that afternoon.
Sagan opened with Venus.
470°C surface temperature. 900°F. Hot enough to melt lead.
"Not because it's closer to the sun," he told the senators. "Venus actually reflects more light than Earth. It should be cooler."
The reason it wasn't: carbon dioxide. A runaway greenhouse effect that turned a planet nearly identical to Earth into a furnace.
Then he looked at the committee and said: we're running the same experiment here.
The senators nodded politely.
Then they went back to approving fossil fuel subsidies.
What Sagan told Congress in 1985:
Global average temperature will rise several degrees by mid-to-late next century.
Local climates will redistribute.
Glaciers will melt. Sea levels will rise.
And the problem cannot be solved by any single nation — not even if the US and Soviet Union agreed on everything — without China.
China, he said, had the world's largest coal reserves and was about to industrialize.
Every sentence was correct.
He also said something that got almost no coverage at the time:
"The initial stages of global temperature increase — one region might benefit while another suffers."
That is the sentence that explains the last 20 years of geopolitics.
Canada's growing season expanding while Pakistan floods. Russia opening Arctic shipping lanes while Bangladesh disappears. The politics of climate was never going to be clean because the physics wasn't distributed evenly.
Sagan mapped all of it from first principles, in a Senate hearing room, 41 years ago.
The part nobody quotes:
He didn't say stop burning fossil fuels immediately.
He said: "That has such severe economic consequences that no one will take it seriously."
So he proposed something else — remove government subsidies from fossil fuels, accelerate solar, develop safe nuclear fission, and begin building international frameworks before the crisis made them impossible.
That's not an environmentalist's speech. That's an economist's.
Carl Sagan wrote 20 books. Cosmos was watched by 500 million people across 60 countries. He won the Pulitzer. The ideas in this testimony became the scientific foundation for a carbon market now valued at over $800 billion annually.
He said one line at the end that nobody remembers.
"We are all in this greenhouse together."
In 1985, that was poetic.
Now it's a weather report.
The full testimony is free on YouTube. 17 minutes. Almost nobody outside of climate policy circles has watched it as a complete predictive model — laid out in plain language before any of it happened.
Francesco Starace retweeted
Las algas son una respuesta concreta frente a la crisis climática y la salud global. 🌿🌊
Producen el 50% del oxígeno de la Tierra, capturan CO2 y estudios en Chile sugieren que sus compuestos podrían ayudar a combatir el cáncer.
Sobre esto explicó el Premio Nacional de Ciencias José Miguel Aguilera en @CongresoFuturo, y en este video profundizamos su impacto 👇
#algas #chile #oceano
Francesco Starace retweeted
E' ovvio che "il caldo non è per sempre" e passerà (come qualcuno lapalissianamente scrisse a giugno). Ma è altrettanto certo che resteranno i mostruosi danni anche economici. Non contrastare i #cambiamenticlimatici ha un prezzo che nessuno può permettersi corriere.it/economia/finanza…
Francesco Starace retweeted
Peter Thiel no es solo un magnate tecnológico. Es un ideólogo que cuestiona abiertamente la democracia y promueve una concentración inédita de poder en datos, algoritmos, energía y política.
En este artículo analizo su pensamiento, la influencia política que ha construido en EE.UU., su avance en Argentina y el contrapunto que representa León XIV frente a una visión tecnocrática del futuro.
Los invito a leer mi reflexión publicada en @elmostrador 👇
media-front.elmostrador.cl/2…
Francesco Starace retweeted
Il fiume (?) Po.
Dovremmo parlare solo di questo ed invece parliamo stupidaggini.
Le stupidaggini che la destra internazionale sovranista ci propina ogni giorno.
#caldo #crisiclimatica



























