Glyco influencer; Powered by generative AI; Carbohydrates; Sugar Doctor; 🟢-fanatic; ⚪-SO₃- too!

Melbourne
Joined October 2014
This may be the most boring tweet of all time.
Bought a book. It was awful. Didn't want it on my shelves, but couldn't throw it away, so it sat on a table near the door. Rushing to an appointment this morning, grabbed it to read. Then went to breakfast and had nothing else. So I spent the morning reading the worst book I own.
1
205
“Mandatorily request”
1
1
262
If this was Australia and Shell, they wouldn’t know their actual revenue.
It's kind of mind blowing when you think of how James Dyson's company is 100% privately owned by him. A company making over $8 billion in revenue.
2
760
The lack of basic financial literacy on full display by the usual crowd of fools. Increased taxes reduce consumption and industry profits, decreased taxes increase consumption and industry profit. It’s basic stuff but these clowns just don’t get it.
Most of what The Australia Institute calls a subsidy is the fuel rebate ($8.9bn in FY24), which predominantly goes to mining, agriculture & transport. Not the oil'n gas industry. If the fuel tax rebate is considered a fossil fuel subsidy, by the same rational the government collected $11.1bn in tax from the fossil fuel industry in 2024. This is on top of $21.5 billion in royalites and corporate taxes in the same year. industryqld.com.au/oil-and-g… HECS is a loan, not a tax. When the government collects this, it's just getting it's money back with inflation added on top.
2
555
Graham Young lies. He twists himself into a pretzel to pretend that the special tax breaks given to petroleum companies, and fossil fuel users, are not subsidies. No other industry gets these tax breaks and rebates. Ergo, they get special treatment.
Richard Dennis lies. The fossil fuel industry is not subsidised in Australia. Interestingly it is in Norway, his ideal country for oil and gas exploration. He must know this. The National Press Club should be ashamed for lowering their standards to host a deep Green propagandist as a speaker.
1
262
Why not restore the stream so it can be enjoyed above ground?
W/ Sydney Water under Aus Square inspecting Tank Stream, water source for Gadigal, & European Aus’s first regular drinking supply & later waste water tunnel - right into harbour! First site of battles b/w consumers & industry for water shares. Candidate for nat. heritage listing?
434
Something lost in this tweet is that the poster is not interested in just publishing their work. If so, they’d just post it on a pre-print. Not are they interested in peer review, as many other journals offer a simpler path. They want the glamour of publishing in a vanity journal
Dear Publishers - We are getting increasingly frustrated. We often spend years on a single(!) study. It includes a lot of planning, expensive experiments, discussions, complex data analysis and writing the final masterpiece. Our students spend their most precious time on it. Our postdocs work to the limit because they know the cost of tenure-track positions. When we finalize the study, we write a thorough story and submit it. And we often celebrate because it’s done. We celebrate all the work we put into the study. But only to find out later that our manuscript is left sitting on someone’s desk for years. __ We don’t blame the editors, many of whom work tirelessly for very little compensation to assess submitted papers, find reviewers and make difficult decisions. Editors are often the same faculty & scientists as we are. We blame the system that favors business over science. The system in which we are expected to use our precious funding just to have that PDF uploaded online. Those $10,000 fees come from taxpayers’ money. Our students could attend 3 conferences instead. We could buy chemicals, instruments, computers... In other words, we could spend it on science and education. But instead we give $10,000 to a journal so that our PDF gets ‘approved’ and comes online, generating up to 40% profit margins for the publisher. __
340
A war? Seriously? Dredging for clicks…
A war has erupted in the medical community, on social media and in health policy over cholesterol-lowering statins, a drug taken by 2.2 million Australians. Now an eminent cardiologist explains why he thinks the anti-statin argument is nonsense.

459
“Plastic straws kill turtles.” Reality: No documented case shows a straw caused a turtle’s death. Yet we have to put up with stupid soggy paper straws.
1
1
355
Note: Zero fans have “lost their minds”
Behind the scenes footage from Sam Kerr’s wedding to Kristie Mewis has been posted online with fans losing their minds.

6
468
Incredibly misinformed tweet. Buffett has given over $60b. cnbc.com/2025/07/02/with-6-b…
Buffet has commissioned no plays, no poems, no symphonies, no operas, no ballets; funded no paintings or sculptures that will outlive him; endowed no theatres, choirs, or orchestras; built no monuments, great homes, museums, churches, monasteries, chantries, baptistries, almshouses, or civic buildings that future generations will marvel at and enjoy.* He has added less to the common stock of civilisation than any man as wealthy before him. He's right that greatness does not come about through accumulating great amounts of money, which is what he is known for, but beyond that it's fortune cookie-level advice. It's not wrong, but that's about it. * His partner, Charlie Munger's contribution to architecture was to fund factory-like college dorms in which a majority of the apartments don't have windows.
3
732
Australia an the UK have swapped positions over the last 20 years
1
403
This guy lives in fantasy land. He will be telling us about unicorns next.
You’d need 3 of these to replace a single nuclear reactor:
1
2
500
A bit of a confession. I’ve been seeing the IT crowd write about vibe-coding. I realise that I’ve been vibe-writing for a while now. When writing a scientific manuscript I get to impasses, and tricky logical arguments. I throw a few dot points down and then let the LLM convert…
1
4
291
…or change. I may also give it access ti a few key papers, and give it some concepts to focus on. I will then work o the text some more, anchoring it to the experimental data I want to present and discuss. I will then ask the LLM to examine the whole text, …
1
195
…looking for flow, logical errors and new-known violations. I find I can write much faster, focusing on content and accuracy, while the LLM provides grammar, logic and flow assistance, and helps grind out key linking sentences.
165
Reading comprehension 0%.
Ignoring capital costs is fraud. If you pay $20,000 extra for an EV and $10,000 extra a home battery - you can’t ignore these costs and pretend you are saving money. If a business did this in a prospectus, the directors would be in jail. But this is just par for the course for Net Zero grifters & spivs - they lie about everything.
311