Here's my latest on the increasing gaps between open-weight and frontier #AI models revealed in the #1stproof third batch results, announced earlier this week: scieye.wordpress.com/2026/10…
Congrats Moni Naor!
Congratulations to Moni Naor on winning the Knuth Prize!
sigact.org/Prizes/knuth/cita…
Watch our Polylogue interview with him by @science_eye last year.
youtu.be/ElKnOs6-Gfg?si=pC0r…
Here are some of my main takeaways from the exciting #Cryptography reunion workshop I attended as a Science Communicator in Residence @SimonsInstitute this summer -
scieye.wordpress.com/2026/09…
Many thanks to the organizers, Elette Boyle, Yuval Ishai, Abhishek Jain & Daniel Wichs!
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
How can quantum particle statistics help—or hinder—Maxwell’s demon, and what are the latest experimental updates about this prediction? I enjoyed talking with science writer Lakshmi Chandrasekharan about quantum thermodynamics, creative writing and more. scieye.wordpress.com/2026/08…
How do social beings get together to successfully solve complex problems, when there's a lack of a central planner? By collaborating, which promotes the evolution of the #social behavior called collective intelligence.
My latest for @TheSIAMNews- siam.org/publications/siam-n…
#math
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
Alternative Fields Medals
Nominate worthy candidates in four categories:
1. Excellence in mathematics research by somebody who is currently over the age of 40.
2. Excellence in mathematics research with approaches that are not mathematically rigorous (construed broadly).
3. Excellence in leadership in the mathematics community (construed broadly).
4. Excellence in exposition of mathematics to a popular audience.
E-mail your suggestions to [email protected] by 10 July 2026.
cc @masonporter
A new blog post about using math to connect classical #thermodynamics with its #quantum origins-
scieye.wordpress.com/2026/06…
Thanks to Soonwon Choi, @quantum_aram & David Huse for the insightful conversations!
#physics
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
Interview with Nikhil Srivastava about AI's capabilities for research math. From @science_eye.
#1stproof
bit.ly/3PJfD1X
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
Some events coming up related to the #1stproof project (hosted by @Harvard this time):
June 3
Introduction to First Proof: A Conversation cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/f…
June 10
First Proof, Second Batch: Results cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/f…
I had an engaging conversation with Nikhil Srivastava about the #1proof project, in my latest blog- scieye.wordpress.com/2026/05…
#math #computing #AI #tech
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
If you like thinking about what math can do for biology and vice versa, you might like this public talk I gave a year ago. It contains a lot of stories from my own life. "From Math to Bio and Back: Reflections on a Two Way Street" youtu.be/feLiP5-lkV0?si=ZVts…
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
The challenges in and possibilities of achieving quantum advantage.
It has been a great pleasure to discuss with @science_eye where we stand in quantum computing, what the remaining road blocks or "gaps" are and how we can overcome them. Recent months and years have been quite a rollercoaster. It makes strong reference to the perspectives article that @preskill and I have written on "mind the gaps: the fraught road to quantum advantage" (scirate.com/arxiv/2510.19928).
Thanks a lot for the time and for the interview.
scieye.wordpress.com/2026/04…
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
I was glad to talk with @PublishersWkly about how much The Proof in the Code is a character-driven book.
In addition to the big ideas about truth and verification, it's a story about a long friendship between @Leonard41111588 and Jeremy Avigad that shaped the development of @leanprover, as well as about the idiosyncratic reasons different mathematicians (Buzzard, Massot, Commelin, Scholze, Tao) found their way to Lean at different points in their careers.
And it's a story of how people's dreams complement and conflict with each other.
Are quantum proofs (solutions) stronger than classical proofs? I cover this in my latest blog- bit.ly/4sv0L5j
Thanks @somechinanigans, @JohnBostanci, Andrew Huang, John Wright, Fermi Ma & Anand Natarajan for the engaging chat! #quantum #theoreticalcomplexity
Have you ever wondered where #math symbols " ➕ ", " ➖", "➗ ", etc. come from? Who developed them and when? If you've then this is for you! My latest story for @SN_Explores is about the evolution of these symbols - snexplores.org/article/where…
#algebra #MathHistory #geometry
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
To all math fans: This is going to be an incredible movie when it comes out. Can't wait!
It's about Maryam Mirzakhani, the first woman to win the Fields Medal.
MARYAM: The Mirror and the Map
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
Excellent blog post by @thomasfbloom, hopefully the first of many! erdosproblems.com/forum/thre…
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
Can you encrypt a program to hide its inner workings while still enabling others to use it? This problem of "program obfuscation" is central to cryptography.
To learn more, see this article! It also touches on a paper by myself, @NeekonV, and @Vinod_MIT from TCC 2024.
In my latest blog I discuss the challenges of building a powerful cryptographic technique that aims to “obfuscate” the internal implementation details of programs-scieye.wordpress.com/2026/01…
Thanks @seyoonragavan & Rahul Ilango for the nice chat about their works @SimonsInstitute!
In my latest blog I discuss the challenges of building a powerful cryptographic technique that aims to “obfuscate” the internal implementation details of programs-scieye.wordpress.com/2026/01…
Thanks @seyoonragavan & Rahul Ilango for the nice chat about their works @SimonsInstitute!
Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, PhD (she/her) retweeted
I've just started reading this new book by Shekhar Khare, a renowned number theorist at @UCLA, and I highly recommend it. It takes the reader on an intellectual adventure, with very illuminating analogies and vivid storytelling. It's a book about some brilliant math, but it also has a great heart.

















