what's really surprising me is that most of the problems needed for fluid robotics (robotics made of fluids and/or for controlling fluids) already exist! in literature and also in many industrial designs! renewable self-assembling structural matrices!

it sounds like you can't totally get rid of solid matter, but solid matter doesn't need to behave like a static rigid structure; there are various evocative hints suggesting that granular, woven, and continuously-moving or continuously-transforming solids can satisfy many needs

i am asking fable to design a 'wet reactor' ( a fusion reactor where all of the structural mass possible is liquid instead of solid )

"reawakening the being question" yep this sounds like heiddi. for what it's wroth the commentary on time is pretty relatable in direct ways to low level and asynchronous programming; philosophy that's about time cannot help but also be about timing-problems

once you've bagged a 1.5k dollar connectx-6, and a 1.5k dollar pcie-mcio switch, you can then get four rtx 5060ti accelerators for twice a spark (each!) or exactly one rtx 5090 in bandwidth and 64gb ram (2x a 5090!). probably ~4k usd?

you're in luck! you can sorta just buy a connectx card, make a pcie router join 4x gaming gpus together.

you aren't allowed to port apple apis to run faster on apple hardware than stupid chud apple SWEs can write. why? *safety classifiers*. obviously this is firing on accessibility software too; making accessibility software less bad is *evil hacker claude* behavior. of course.

let it be said that i am a 1000x engineer (compared to apple swe)

this thread is a joke but you have to know a lot about gradient methods to get what it's saying

nobody has tried giving people a preemptive waiver to ignore all local or state laws in exchange for posting a large enough amount of money with a court and having a judge preemptively assigned to the case or whatever then adjudicate all issues after the fact