Pinned Tweet
.@Waymo and @Cruise will soon be available to everyone in San Francisco. Thank you to @californiapuc for your confidence in the ability for AVs to continue to advance and improve the safety and sustainability of California's roads.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
There's a new and very stupid talking point being brought out by the anti-AV people. Polling people in cities that don't have AVs about safety, and then saying "The average person has questions about the so-called safety of these cars." The average person hasn't seen the data.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
The problem AV opponents will have with this talking point is that there will be more polls to come that show skepticism moves to support as soon as people share the road with AVs.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
I have a guest essay in @nytimes today about autonomous vehicle safety. I wrote it because I’m tired of seeing children die. Done right, we can eliminate car crashes as a leading cause of death in the United States
@Waymo recently released data covering nearly 100 million driverless miles. I spent weeks analyzing it because the results seemed too good to be true. 91% fewer serious-injury crashes. 92% less pedestrians hit. 96% fewer injury crashes at intersections. The list goes on.
39,000 Americans died in crashes last year. More than homicide, plane crashes, and natural disasters combined. The #2 killer of children and young adults. The #1 cause of spinal cord injury. We’ve accepted this as the price of mobility.
We don’t have to.
In medicine, when a treatment shows this level of benefit, we stop the trial early. Continuing to give patients the placebo becomes unethical. When an intervention works this clearly, you change what you do.
In driving, we’re all the control group.
Cities like DC and Boston are blocking deployment. And cities are not the only forces mobilizing to slow this progress.
It’s time we stop treating this like a tech moonshot and start treating it like a public health intervention that will save lives.
Link to article below.
👀 this video of Waymo cars evading crashes with people and vehicles. I especially note the ones that require it having a 360° view.
My sincere thanks to Alex Ellerbeck and @acsifferlin for their wisdom and sure hand in editing this piece.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
"If @Waymo’s results are indicative of the broader future of autonomous vehicles, we may be on the path to eliminating traffic deaths as a leading cause of mortality in the United States." nytimes.com/2025/12/02/opini…
In the past two weeks, two major airports have opened up to Waymo: SJC and now SFO. Well done to the policymakers who are making this happen including @DanielLurie and @MattMahanSJ.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
hope i’m not speaking too soon but it seems like the haters and losers just completely lost the fight against self-driving cars in san francisco. total waymo victory. waymo nationalism ascendant.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
New editorial: Boston politicians fight the future by slow-rolling Waymos. washingtonpost.com/opinions/…
Safer Roads for All retweeted
This, quite literally, defeats the purpose of AUTONOMOUS vehicles, and is disingenuous.
Looks like we’ll be knocking on some doors in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Teamsters have filed a ballot initiative that would require all autonomous vehicles to have a human driver. @christianbrits @binarybits mass.gov/doc/25-25-initiativ…
Safer Roads for All retweeted
Massachusetts has a choice: support a technology that demonstrably saves lives, or isolate itself at the Teamsters' behest
Massachusetts Teamsters have filed a ballot initiative that would require all autonomous vehicles to have a human driver. @christianbrits @binarybits mass.gov/doc/25-25-initiativ…
Safer Roads for All retweeted
Massachusetts Teamsters have filed a ballot initiative that would require all autonomous vehicles to have a human driver. @christianbrits @binarybits mass.gov/doc/25-25-initiativ…
Safer Roads for All retweeted
In California, there will soon be a bill on the governor’s desk that bans AVs from delivering *things* because of “safety” while allowing AVs to continue to move *people.* calmatters.digitaldemocracy.…
Safer Roads for All retweeted
We should be much more explicit about the tradeoff here:
The Teamsters are demanding that we let thousands of people die in car crashes in order to protect their jobs.
Last month's hearing in Boston on self-driving car was like a parody of the attitudes @DKThomp and @ezraklein critiqued in Abundance.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
How many lives will be lost over the next five years by cities banning or slowing the rollout of @Waymo and other automated vehicles?
Safer Roads for All retweeted
One has to admire Boston unions for largely not even bothering to come up with public-spirited justifications for trying to hamstring driverless car services. They're explicit about their protectionism. reason.com/2025/07/30/union-…
Safer Roads for All retweeted
AVs are one of the great new technologies! They're safer than humans. Consumers love them. And some in Boston want to do regulatory sabotage at the behest of special interests. Unbelievable Luddism.
Make no mistake about it- people will die as a result if this bill passes.
Safer Roads for All retweeted
And like that: Boston City Council is set to vote on a resolution to ban AVs until a board of city officials and labor reps decides if they should be allowed at all. Even if approved, safety drivers would still be required.
erinforboston.com/f/ordinanc….
Safer Roads for All retweeted
Help reduce drunk driving deaths in DC, sign this petition:
waymo.quorum.us/campaign/DC2…
@theHillisHome @BarredinDC @PoPville



































