
More active on 🦋@sneuroble.bsky.social | Comp neuroscientist working towards precision fMRI / networks | @Northeastern | @Yale | @NIH BRAIN R00 | Peru-Am 🇵🇪
Boston, MA
Joined February 2017
- Tweets2.8K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.3K
- Likes10.4K
NOA in hand, we are ready to launch research in the NeuroPRISM lab!🚀 Appreciate @noahghola @ResearchAtNU @NUGlobalNews taking time to profile this @NIMHgov R00-funded project
Now hiring a fully-funded postdoc—reach out if interested & spread the word!
news.northeastern.edu/resear…
📣 Attn researchers interested in movie fcMRI x reliability! Glad to have been part of this work led by @ShearerHallee & @headspace_lab
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Yup, everyone’s heading to🦋 (again) in case you haven’t heard. I know we’re all dissatisfied. Come join us in trying to shift the community one more time
( Pic h/t @andreashorn_ )
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Researchers at KI have made a significant breakthrough in single-cell RNA-seq technology by developing fully synthetic RNase inhibitors that can replace protein-based reagents. Published in @NatureComms. By @JCMolBio, @antle718, @mhagemannjensen, @sandberglab, @BReinius et al.
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Thanks for such a wonderful symposium :) Lots of fun with my BU teammates! #ABCT2024
Congrats to a wonderful symposium panel on enhancing CBT interventions for trauma @kathyshekhtman @dmoskowdiamond @josephkcarpent @psychonetrics @AndrewCurreri
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Understanding the difference between Standard Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SE) is crucial for accurate data interpretation. SD measures the variability within your data, indicating how spread out the individual data points are from the mean.
In contrast, SE measures the uncertainty around the sample mean as an estimate of the population mean. It reflects the precision of the mean, with SE decreasing as the sample size increases, making your estimate more reliable.
The relationship between SD and SE is given by the formula: SE = SD / √(sample size). While SD remains relatively constant with larger samples, SE diminishes, highlighting the reduced uncertainty in the mean estimate.
A common mistake in research is using the “±” notation without specifying whether it refers to SD or SE, leading to potential misinterpretation of the data. Clear distinction is essential for transparency and accuracy in reporting.
Key Takeaways:
• Use SD to describe data variability.
• Use SE to indicate the precision of the mean.
• Always specify which measure you are reporting.
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Universities *outside* the US about now should be working on 4-year positions and facilitating move abroad... With possibility of extension to 8 or 12 years...
I heard of something like that in Canada or Italy, no???
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Proud mama moment! Look at my little guy loving brain science with the assist from my wonderful husband!
💯💯💯
To those applying to PhD programs, this is great advice for contacing potential PIs—take note!
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Another @UCLA faculty position! Assistant Professor (Measurement Issues in Complex Data Structures) recruit.apo.ucla.edu/JPF0988… 👇🏾
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
🚨Call for Submissions: Special Issue on Open Datasets
📷Aperture Neuro, in collaboration with OHBM's Open Science SIG, invites submissions on open datasets in neuroscience.
📷Deadline: 28 February 2025🗓️
apertureneuro.org/pages/731-…
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Here's a preliminary release of our calculator to explore sample size and scan time to maximize individual-level prediction accuracy: leonoqr.github.io/ORSP_Calcu…
Let us know if anything is unclear or if there's bugs. Your feedback is welcome. If you find this calculator helpful for your grant application, etc, please also let us know!
Super excited about our revised study! 4 more datasets showing robustness across fMRI sequences, racial groups, disorders, lifespan, phenotypic domains & resting/task FC: doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.5…
@Leon_Oo1 @ZShaoshi @csabaorban broke the lab's record with a 76-page response!
A deep empirical dive into the limits of generalizability led by Brendan Adkinson and @DScheinost ⭐️
Can neuroimaging predictive models survive across diverse real-world data?🧠🌎We put models to the test across 3 large-scale unharmonized datasets with over 2,800 participants. See our new work in this special issue of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
Thanks @ajdneuro 😊
This was such a fun conversation with Andy, ranging from reliability to study planning to anti/localizationism and beyond. Exciting to be part of this latest incarnation of Andy’s Brain Blog!
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
Repeat after me: LAB WEBSITES MATTER!
While it may seem like a nice-to-have... in today's world, it's a need-to-have. For you, your trainees, and your prospective team members.
I couldn't have written this better myself: nature.com/articles/s42255-0…
Very cool—congrats @AnaM_Triana and @eglerean !!
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
University of Michigan has an open assistant professor position in Complex Systems. Amazing opportunity to do join an interdisciplinary community of faculty and students. Looking for discipline thinkers who transcend disciplines. lsa.umich.edu/cscs/news-even…
Anyone else a bit obsessed with playing FoldIt in the late 2000’s, & remember when this came out?
nature.com/articles/nature09…
This past decade has such an exciting success story for DL in protein folding
BREAKING NEWS
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2024 #NobelPrize in Chemistry with one half to David Baker “for computational protein design” and the other half jointly to Demis Hassabis and John M. Jumper “for protein structure prediction.”
Stephanie Noble (@sneuroble.bsky.social) retweeted
What are mechanisms in neuroscience? How can we support clarity & progress? 🧠📕🖊️
Article in @_TheTransmitter w @DaniSBassett & Ross with comments from John Krakauer @blamlab @LucinaUddin Arnsten @DesrochersLab @aa_fenton @kaczkurkin @ar0mcintosh @PessoaBrain & @mike_yassa !
Lauren Ross @ProfLaurenRoss and @DaniSBassett outline the different ways neuroscientists use the term mechanism, and they gather insight from nine scientists on how this variety makes it difficult to clarify standards in the field.
thetransmitter.org/the-big-p…
























