rustyfox (@rustyfox) header
rustyfox (@rustyfox) profile picture
Joined January 2009
Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)Photo by rustyfox (@rustyfox)
Morning All! 🙂
20
9
4
97
1,754
When your vegetarian friends invite you for dinner.. 😅
254
2,138
180
19,435
410,936
rustyfox retweeted
Every man who walked with God had a story. Remember that!
50
827
4
6,797
225,120
Goodnight y’all 😴💤 Yep!!
101
364
14
2,160
29,877
rustyfox retweeted
Truth is stranger than fiction…
1,361
12,664
738
54,827
841,604
Replying to @LeeRespecter
This is your post condensed down to one word:
1
6
81
Ex-Muslim woman who grew up in a Muslim family explains “some weird things Muslim women are not allowed to do” - You're not allowed to pluck your eyebrows until you get married - You're not allowed to wax your legs or your hands or your face until you get married - You are not allowed to have tattoos - Even getting your eyebrows microbladed and eyeliner tattoos are not allowed - You're also technically not allowed to have Botox or fillers. It's considered haram, even though a lot of Muslim women do - Technically, you're not allowed to wear makeup, but there's still a lot of Muslim women who wear makeup - Women can't wear tank tops or shorts even when it's super hot “You always have to like be conscious of what you wear, what you do, because you will most likely get harassed on the street no matter how old you are. I remember I was probably 10 when I started getting harassed on the street. So that's a daily life of a Muslim woman who lives in a Muslim country” What’s it going to take for women in America to understand what Democrats are importing?? When Muslims run for office in America, roughly 98% of the time they run as Democrats If you vote Democrat, Islamic culture is going to overstate American culture. Women in America are going to be oppressed. Vote Red
213
3,286
72
8,524
207,734
rustyfox retweeted
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni @mscott Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice Dear Professor Scott, I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust. You cannot be serious. You are quoted as saying: "Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other." Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic. My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government. While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage. At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live. People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later. Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure. Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking. I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable. And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was. Kind? For whom? Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods. And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support. The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified. The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings. While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive. Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand. We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on. Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them. And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion? It is sickening. Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment? Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them? Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand? I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause. Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences. I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do... But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price. We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up. Some of those people will never recover what they lost. And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy. What an absolute disgrace. Yours sincerely, Alia Bland Co-founder, Voices for Freedom New Zealand
1,187
3,455
420
12,070
395,902
Top 10 oops moments.
31
105
11
1,990
29,677
There are basically two ways of running any country or political system: One is socialist communism—all power to the state. The state does the planning and the people have to conform to the plan. The people are the pawns of the state. They have no human rights other than those granted to them by the state. To me, with my religious background, that was totally and utterly wrong. It denied the human spirit. The system which I believe in finds its most eloquent expression in the American Declaration of Independence: The state is there to serve the liberties of the people, their own spirit, and to develop their own talents and abilities. And so that the strong does not intimidate the weak, freedom is made to work by a rule of law. It is your duty to use your talents and abilities. It is your duty to accept responsibility because you accept freedom. You need private property for that; the property does not belong to the state. You have your own land, your own shares, you have savings, you have thrift. Out of that, it is your bounden duty to give to those less fortunate than yourselves.
31
290
35
877
28,413
Sadly, most people will not listen to what she’s trying to say which is the truth about Islam
77
782
94
1,642
37,975
Replying to @SandraWeeden
7
36
1,012
I note that a lot of people today are questioning Aboriginal history and culture. So, here's some modern 'ancient' 'Truth-telling', some you may know, some not: - Dot paintings were invented in 1971 by Geoffrey Bardon who then taught the style and technique to Aborigines. - The Welcome to Country Ceremony was invented in 1976 by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley to welcome Maori performers. - There is no Aboriginal word or phrase for Welcome to Country, unlike the Maoris’ welcome/wardance, the ‘haka’. As such, it cannot have been invented prior to colonisation and the introduction of English. How, in ancient times, would they have asked “Who’s doing the Welcome to Country Ceremony?” if there were no words in Aboriginal languages for it? - The Acknowledgement of Country was invented in the 1990s - There is no film or video evidence of any of these ceremonies existing at important events such as Royal Tours, the 1956 Olympics, etc. prior to the 70s. - The not mentioning the name of deceased Aboriginal people or showing an image or providing a warning in an article is also modern. As recently as 2011 when boxer Lionel Rose died, not even the ABC did this. - ‘Walkabout’ is now considered an offensive term, since it implies someone is late or lazy, despite it being an integral part of initiation ceremonies. - ‘The oldest living culture’ is not just factually incorrect, it defies logic. The branch of the tree cannot be older than the tree itself. Humans evolved in Africa. There are African tribes that live almost exactly as they did 100,000+ years ago, without welfare, 4WDs, mobile phones, etc. Aborigines are descended from these tribes as humans moved out of Africa and around the world. As such, Aboriginal culture cannot possibly be older than the cultures from which they are derived. (See: diagram) - Aborigines were never categorized or classified in Australia under the Flora and Fauna Act, despite Linda Burney and many others claiming this. This has been fact-checked and verified by the ABC as a complete and utter myth. - The term ‘First Nations’ has been culturally appropriated from North American natives. - The term ‘totem’ is used now widely. Many Aboriginal people adopt or are given a totem. But if this is, as claimed, an ancient tradition, what are the Aboriginal words, in any of the many languages, for ‘totem’ or ‘totems? ‘Totem’ is word from the Ojibwa tribe of North American natives. It is not an ancient Aboriginal word. It, too, is appropriated or 'stolen', ironically. - ‘Deadly’ is not an Aboriginal word. It was a popular term in the 60s: ‘deadly good’. It was often used to describe a bicycle: ‘a deadly treadly’. - Uluru (Ayers Rock) is, according to the area’s most senior elder, Paddy Uluru, of no cultural significance and is not sacred. Only recently has this been claimed to stop people climbing it. - The Lake Bolac ‘eel’ rock arrangement required a machine to move the rocks. Which is more likely: that Aborigines arranged the 100+kg rocks 1,500 years ago or it was created more recently in the 20th Century to promote the Annual Eel Festival? - Neologisms: ‘On country’; ‘Blak’; ‘First Nations’, ‘Blakfullah’, ‘Blak’, ‘First People’, ‘Welcome to Country Ceremony’, ‘Smoking Ceremony’, ‘Rainbow Serpent’ and ‘Dreamtime’ – all English-language-derived, not Aboriginal, such as ‘gangurru’ (kangaroo). - Things that have fallen out of fashion: ‘Pointing the bone’; curses; photography stealing the soul. - In almost every instance, the occurrence of a ‘massacre’ was settlers’ retribution for Aborigines stealing sheep, killing workers and/or raping wives and daughters. The notion that settlers or troops went out riding to kill Aborigines for ‘sport’ is a myth. - The notion of a government-mandated, sanctioned or planned ‘genocide’ isn’t supported and the scale of Aboriginal deaths is widely disputed. Estimates vary so wildly that they cannot be replied upon: from over 1,000,000 to around 200,000 to 100,000 to just 10,000. - Rainbow Serpent is not translated from any Aboriginal language. Similarly, ‘Dreamtime’ is not translated from any Aboriginal language. (See: diags) So, what hasn't been made up in the past 50 years? You tell me.
144
659
42
3,357
116,235
rustyfox retweeted
There seems to be some confusion amongst some people, so I will explain it as clearly as I can: Australia’s sex discrimination act was created for women, on the basis of our sex. When it was enacted in 1984 (ominous year, in hindsight) employment was a big part of it. There was a part of the act, section 7D, that allowed “special measures” where things exclusively for women weren’t even classed as discrimination, basically when it was being a woman is what actually mattered in the situation. Specific employment/opportunity provisions and… woman-only spaces fell/fall into this category. In 2013, the Gillard amendments introduced “gender identity” while taking the definitions of woman & man out of the act. Sex was never defined, but in a normal world it didn’t have to be. It could only have meant one thing (a mistake, again in hindsight). By the time the trans absurdity hit fever pitch, Australian institutions were captured. This included those meant to be the custodians of the SDA. Suddenly, all they cared about was “gender identity” aka transgender ideology. When the Tickle v Giggle case came along, it started with an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint. To settle it, aka not have it advance to federal court, I was expected to just agree with transgender ideology. I don’t. I wish I could say I completely understood the magnitude at the time, but it’s almost impossible to. You think you do, but you don’t really until it hits you like a bus. But what I did know, instinctively, was that if I folded, I couldn’t live with it, nor would it help because all it signaled was that “we” would just accept it if threatened. I found myself in a position to challenge the absurdity, and I did, because I knew not doing it would have been worse no matter what. Obviously, everyone knows now, the courts ruled against me in every way they could. From what a woman is, to 7D, to damages. I lost - and have lost - everything. But what does it mean to everyone else in reality? It means the sex discrimination commissioner told the court that the ordinary meaning of woman includes men who claim to be women, and the court accepted that. Men who claim to be women are women in Australia, via the only legislation they have to validate it. It means that for every aspect of the SDA, per the SDC’s demand, woman includes men who claim to be women. From employment to women only spaces to pregnancy protections, because of section 7D. Did we warn about this in our court submissions and arguments? Yes. That was actually our entire case. You can read it. It’s all publicly available. The high court said that we would have no possibility of success. We were arguing that women is adult human female and this matters in, tada, section 7D. That was it. The high court said “hell no way”. The high court is captured too. As it stands, due to legal precedent, a special measure for women based on sex does not provide a defense to gender identity discrimination. That means that all special measures for women fall to gender identity, which will only be used by men who claim to be women, and includes - tada - employment, and women only spaces. It means that men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women, while simultaneously taking away our rights. I don’t know how many more times I could say the “Tickle v Giggle” case is about more than “just” one app, I’ve been saying it for almost 5 years, but I will continue to do it until everyone understands. They wiped women’s rights off the map. It’s a f—ing mess. It doesn’t work. It’s incoherent. It’s ideological. It writes women out of law. It’s corruption. It’s totalitarian. It’s bullsh-t. It’s the test of any government: are you ok with legislating a lie?
170
1,426
78
6,171
106,172
Welcome to Australia 🇦🇺
14
48
2
582
5,315
rustyfox retweeted
“How much sympathy am I supposed to have for a man who wants to wear a dress? Just do it. If you want to call yourself a woman that’s none of my business. What he can’t do is force me to believe that & take away our existing rights because of his nonsense belief about himself.”👇
36
747
13
5,331
39,979
A refresher……1984 in less than 3 minutes….👇
87
2,048
114
5,451
176,895
27 MORE DAYS FOR OUR BROTHER IN CHRIST LAST CHANCE FOR FREEDOM. They arrested our brother in Christ, Dr. Augustinos Samaan, simply for preaching Jesus and leading souls to Him. They arrested him on 10/1/25 at 1:30 a.m. without warning. Muslim inmates burned his legs with cigarettes while the guards looked the other way. He was starved, denied clean water, medical care, and any protection. As the only Christian in his cell he was tortured and beaten. He has been refused even the basic right to wash his face or take a shower. His head is crawling with lice. They tortured him behind closed doors in an attempt to break him and force him to renounce his faith. For the "crime" of following Jesus, Egyptian authorities sentenced this man of God to five years of hard labor, legalized slavery. His mother died three months after the sentence was handed down. She literally died of a blood clot and grief. They likely denied him the chance to even bury her. He didn't get to attend her funeral. Egypt has now rejected Dr. Augustinos Samaan's first appeal for freedom. Does Egypt have a conscience? Why is he still serving a five-year sentence of forced labor for his Christian faith when Egypt should be compensating him for everything they have done to him? 💔 Why is there zero accountability for the torture, the cigarette burns, the lice, the denial of food and water, and the systematic persecution? Egypt claims to protect the three divine religions while it crushes Christians under its boot. This is selective enforcement and pure hypocrisy. Look at Augustinos Samaan's YouTube channel. His mother was everything to him. Egypt stole his freedom, his health, his dignity, and his mother. The only things they could not take are his faith and the life he still fights for every single day. Pray hard for our brother in Christ. Open your eyes. This is how Egypt really feels about Christians. Instead of making a change or making things right in his case, they would rather keep him locked away and silenced. The Egyptian government cannot compensate him for everything he has been through because of the charges they fabricated against him. Why allow someone to get a degree in comparative religion, offer "religious freedom in the Constitution," then arrest someone for exercising their degree and their constitutional right? Instead of taking photo opportunities to say how much you protect the human rights of all, take action. Words mean nothing. START RIGHT HERE AND SHOW US HOW MUCH THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF CHRISTIANS REALLY MEAN TO THE EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT. #TheWorldIsWatchingandIwontStop #EndCopticPersecution #EndChristianPersecution #FreeAugustinosSamaan
1
15
2
30
881
Next Minute: The eSafety Commissioner
46
275
17
1,651
22,860
“A country can welcome people from anywhere, but only if there’s something to join. Without a shared culture, you don’t get diversity. You get conflict.” - @BasicOptimism
8
38
1
98
839