R&D. Design @OneProject. Mentor @NEWINC. Visiting Faculty @CalArts. Executive Board @LeonardoISAST

Joined December 2008
While Trump & Big Tech privatize money creation through stablecoins, we designed an alternative with Yanis. Give that power to the people instead: digital central bank accounts funding a trust fund for everyone without new taxes or debt. See how monetarycommons.com/
A TRUST FUND FOR EVERYONE: How to create a Monetary Commons that socialises money and funds a basic dividend without new taxes or debt [At a time Donald Trump, Big Tech and Wall Street deploy stablecoins to privatise the dollar, usurping the decentralising power of blockchain to enrich themselves at everyone else’s expense, here is an alternative use of blockchain that harnesses its decentralising powers to benefit everyone equally – to pay everyone a substantial, non-inflationary, basic dividend – without the need to tax or borrow. Read on and/or watch the video] Here is an idea that can make a real, urgently needed, difference to our awfully divided, exploitative societies. Imagine a trust fund for everyone paying a personal dividend to each. Now imagine a common, a public digital platform, let’s call it a Monetary Commons, that harnesses our collective capacity to create the money needed to fund this personal dividend for all. The idea of a personal or basic income is not new, of course. People have sung its praises for decades. But they were stifled. The majority doesn’t want to pay higher taxes, or the higher interest rates more public debt would bring, to deliver a personal payment to others, including to the already stinking rich. But what if it is now possible to pay a decent personal dividend without new taxes or new public debt. How? Not by magic or hocus pocus economics but by reclaiming from private bankers our society’s power to create money. Today, we have the digital tools to take back the power to create money, use that power to create a common trust fund, and pay each a personal dividend. These tools are here already. And if we do not use them for benefitting everyone, the bankers and Big Tech will use them to print more money for themselves. So, let’s get cracking! Let’s build a new Monetary Commons to pay a personal dividend to each! How would it work? Technically, it is ever so simple. You download an app, let’s call it Monetary Commons Pay (or MCPay). MCPay is provided by your central bank (the Fed in the US, the ECB in Europe, the Bank of England in Britain etc.). Essentially, the central bank has opened a digital account for you which you can use to receive and pay money, the way you use your normal bank account app. How is this MCPay app helpful? In three fabulous ways, which I shall present in ascending order of importance. First, because with MCPay you can send and receive money for free, avoiding the terrible, inexcusable, fees charged by private banks – even the ‘fuel fees’ of crypto. The second, even greater, benefit is that the money you keep in your MCPay grows at the central bank interest rate – which is always higher than the measly rate private banks pay for your savings. Free transactions and higher interest on your savings would be good enough reasons to have the MCPay app. But, the truly mesmerising, hugely exciting benefit is the third one: The new app makes it possible for the Central Bank to pay you, and everyone else, a substantial personal dividend. Pay attention to see where this money will come from, why it is not inflationary, why it requires no new taxes, no new debt and no magic: You have heard of how private banks create loans from thin air, right? How they can turn, on average, $3 of new deposits into a new $100 loan? [Yes, lest we forget, only 3% of the money in our advanced economies come from the central bank – the rest is conjured up by private banks.] But this works in reverse as well! If bankers turn $3 into $100, were you to transfer $3 from your normal bank to your MCPay, to take advantage of free transactions and the higher interest rate, you will have annulled your banker’s opportunity to create $100. In other words, as you transfer $3 from your bank to your new MCPay account, the total quantity of money in the economy would fall by, $100 minus $3, $97. Would this not be bad for the economy? It sure would be if nothing was done about it. But wait. Suppose the central bank were to create $97 for every $3 transferred to someone’s MCPay and credit that extra $97, equally, to everyone’s MCPay account. Bingo! Do you see now how a personal dividend was made possible without new taxes, new debt or potentially inflationary increases in the quantity of money? Now, please do not think that this a theoretical discussion. Yes, our governments, in the pockets of financiers as they are, are not interested in giving you the option of an MCPay app. But, with Donald Trump at the helm and his GENIUS Act on the statutes, they are busily handing over this incredible power to create money not to society, not to a Monetary Commons, but to Big Tech and Wall Street. How? By shunning the MCPay app that would benefit you, everyone, equally, and pushing instead for so-called stablecoins issued by privateers, mainly Big Tech and Wall Street, for their benefit. But how much money could we expect to receive as a personal dividend if we were to create a monetary commons? The answer is: a lot! The US Treasury recently predicted that around worth $6.6 trillion of US bank deposits will be transferred to stablecoins - the private version of MCPay from which you will benefit not at all. Yes, $6.6 trillion, that is more than six thousand billion dollars. If such a sum were to be transferred to the monetary commons, to our MCPay accounts, keeping the quantity of money in the US constant would require that the Fed credits $213 trillion to everyone’s MCPay accounts. That’s considerably more than $600 thousand for each woman, man and child resident in the US! And similarly in Britain, Europe, Japan etc. A sizeable trust fund for everyone. This is a remarkable opportunity for making a difference to our awfully divided societies. We must seize it. For the benefit of the many, not the few. Of course, the few – beginning with the bankers – will scream blue murder. They will do their utmost to stop this from happening. They will fearmonger like crazy, eager as they are to usurp the lion’s share of the money that society generates collectively. They will try to terrorise you with tales of calamities that will befall you if this Monetary Commons were to be created. They will prognosticate cataclysmic inflation – even though the whole point of the personal dividend is to keep the money supply constant. They will terrorise you with the prospect of new taxation and new public debt – even though they understand that there is no need for new taxes or new public debt to pay you a substantial personal dividend. To appeal to your social conscience, they will tell you that a Monetary Commons is Elon Musk’s and the libertarians’ way to dismantle social security – even though there is no reason to cut social security in any way to fund everyone’s personal dividend. They will bombard you with the spectre of Big Brother, likening the Monetary Commons to a Chinese Communist Party ploy to have the central bank follow your every transaction – even though they know that MCPay can easily be built on distributed ledger technology that guarantees privacy to each while preventing the authorities from manipulating the money supply without the public noticing. As they scream and shout and terrorise you, you will know: Bankers just hate the idea of going back to the role of intermediaries, of borrowing from Jack to lend to Jill. They are only interested in maintaining their monopoly over the money system – and to extend it now that digital money enhances society’s capacity to create even more new money, a capacity that they want to privatise when we should want to share equally. So, let us ignore the shrieks of the moneymen and let us use new tech to share better the benefits from our collective capacity to create money. Let’s make building a Monetary Commons our common goal. It won’t cure all of our deeply exploitative society’s ills. But it will go a long way to cure many and, perhaps more importantly, it will give the many a sense of their power. FOR MORE ON THE MONETARY COMMONS, VISIT monetarycommons.com/ @rarar @hiradsab @DiEM_25
2
6
1,170
NEW: We're excited to launch our new #UBS Hub website 🎉 As well as our latest research and details on how to join the network, the site also hosts a a live atlas of UBS-adjacent pilots and policies around the world 🌏 Take a look 👇 ubshub.org/
2
1
3
466
Raphael Arar retweeted
No notes.
102
246
168
2,728
224,176
Raphael Arar retweeted
Glad to have contributed to The Nature of Information, a collective inquiry into how we might better understand our increasingly complex information environment from an ecological perspective. The Telluride LASER report is in Leonardo, MIT Press: doi.org/10.1162/LEON.a.2728
1
4
420
Anwar Shaikh has left this world. He was so clear in his thinking that he left a deep imprint on the thinking of generations of New School students and readers behind. He would always insist that we had to get the first principles right. If you start from an absurd model and then argue the world is imperfect measured against that standard from cloud cuckoo land, you have gone astray with no way to return but to start anew. He wanted to rebuild economics from scratch going back to the classics and in this process became a classic himself. It’s hard to picture economics without Anwar. As we are challenged to rebuild the basics, we need his thinking more than ever. Thank you for leaving your writing for us. May you rest in peace.
15
338
25
1,236
70,987
Raphael Arar retweeted
I have a bold suggestion for America’s next AI Czar: Put the people in charge of AI’s future.
1
3
1
16
1,006
Raphael Arar retweeted
A good combo to read together.
6
31
7
408
39,104
Raphael Arar retweeted
The President is choosing an AI Czar, and I'm throwing my hat in the ring (dark horse though I may be). From developing Google Drive to founding Asana and One Project, I've spent a career helping people collaborate on hard problems. Collaborating to steer the future of AI is our hardest problem yet. AI will supercharge whatever goals we give it. It could cure diseases, create industries, and make life more affordable for everyone. But if we aim its enormous power at the wrong goals, even unintentionally, the results could be catastrophic. I saw it happen after I helped create Facebook's Like button. This isn't a partisan issue. We don't have to choose between the President's vision of "building America's Golden Age" and protecting human wellbeing. They're one and the same. As AI Czar, I would: 1. Let Americans decide what to do with the money AI generates. President Trump wants Americans to share in AI's success, calling it "a partnership with the American public." He's right. A share of AI's wealth should go to the public: we, the people, whose cultural output is the resource these companies mine, and whose lives they'll disrupt. But if AI does all the work, and only a few people own it, a dividend check alone leaves the rest of us with no leverage at all. And handing the money to political appointees ties it to politics. Instead, I'd push for participatory budgeting, where Americans decide together how to invest it. In Columbus, Ohio, residents are practicing it to decide how to spend $9 million. 2. Give Americans a governing stake in major AI companies. Senator Sanders has proposed the U.S. take a governing stake in the labs. I'd go one step further and put it in the hands of the American people, through a citizens' assembly on AI, not another Washington commission. 3. Lead the world toward international cooperation, like we did with nuclear safety. The President has said, "Whoever wins AI, wins." But if AI puts humanity in danger, everyone loses. Just as America pioneered nuclear safety protocols and then led the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency, we can lead on democratic control of AI, with citizens' assemblies of everyday Americans, chosen by lottery and supported by experts, proposing the goals AI must serve and the guardrails it must honor. Washington would have to adopt each proposal or publicly explain why not. Assemblies are already shaping AI policy in the UK, Belgium, and Taiwan. Ours would also lend democratic legitimacy to U.S. proposals in talks like the ones Secretary Bessent recently began with China. President Trump is optimistic about the future of AI, and I want to be too. As AI Czar, I would do what I do best: help people collaborate. Together, we can prevent the worst and realize the full promise of AI: a stronger, healthier, more prosperous America, and world. If you agree that Americans deserve a say in AI's future, please share this, and share your ideas (or feedback on mine) in the comments.
2
1
11
1,305
Raphael Arar retweeted
"The Necessity of Revolution" I'm in the new @catalyst_theory arguing that conditions make another long period of stable social-democratic advance less likely, meaning any serious socialist politics must move more quickly toward rupture with capitalism. catalyst-journal.com/2026/09…
5
38
11
207
27,177
Raphael Arar retweeted
I feel like it's underreported that the godfather of AI Geoffrey Hinton is openly a socialist and has stated "capitalism can't handle AI—only socialism can save us."
7
15
3
78
2,851
Raphael Arar retweeted
Introducing Recipes, because a good workflow is worth repeating. Recipes let you save any workflow and use it again whenever you need it. Browse the gallery for recipes made by the community, or make your own. Check out some of our favorite recipes below ↓
18
23
4
139
779,393
Raphael Arar retweeted
Andrew Holter interviews Tom Overton, author of a new biography, “John Berger: From Life” (@VersoBooks). In a fascinating exchange, Overton discusses his friendship with Berger, the biography's literary approach, Berger on Palestine, and future releases. proteanmag.com/2026/09/23/to…
14
4
36
10,698
Raphael Arar retweeted
I helped build Facebook's like button. It was meant to spread a little positivity. It became an engine for addiction, because addiction is more profitable than connection. That wasn't a design failure. It was an economic one. And we're about to repeat it with AI.
5
6
2
31
1,555
Raphael Arar retweeted
I'm excited to finally announce All Models Are Wrong (on @Substack)! The thesis of the show is that the continued development and introduction of “frontier technologies” will (as it has already) bisect traditional political camps in ways that will surprise us. The models that we’ve grown up with to make sense of the world have increasingly failed us and do not reflect our current reality. Technology is never just technology. All Models Are Wrong examines who controls and benefits from these systems and how they might be organized differently. More details to come soon and subscribe below🔖
6
10
1
48
2,849
Happy Birthday to Karl Marx’s Capital Volume I, published on 14 September 1867. I've taught Marx's Capital every year since 1971. My new free virtual course, The Story of Capital, meets tomorrow, Tuesday, September 15th at 4:15 pm [ET].
7
166
8
635
15,510
Next week: Join me for a free public livestream of my new course, The Story of Capital. The course meets on Tuesdays from 4:15 - 6:15 pm [ET] from September 8th to December 1st.
5
122
7
448
16,619