So, did posting this make you feel important?

So you wrongly use (redefine?) a term, present it as a scientific dx, and then bring in the -isms and eugenics. All w a straight face.

She says it all w the “we refuse to believe”.

“Scam is life”. 😂😂😂

I’ll take it. 🫡

Def a bro in spirit, or, to add to your taxonomy, I might be a brocel.

This is such a dry and scathing read, fucking hell. 😂

Oh, Nobunaga, these posts warm my heart. In all seriousness, if we could all bring some of your appreciation/honour/sincerity to these everyday things, the world would be a better place.

“All tears are hiding anger” - that one deserves some pondering…

@DanTalks1 what’s your take on this?

“All the goodness and the heroisms will rise up again, then be cut down again and rise up. It isn’t that the evil thing wins — it never will — but that it doesn’t die.” - John Steinbeck (in a letter written to his best friend during WWll)

“Stancil’s lesbianic schoolboy neotomy”. Oh my sides 😂

I am not crying.

"Maintaining First World life requires a First World mindset".

Would you call that logically inconsistent? Sounds more like they’re being disingenuous or hypocritical.

They have a name for that too: 2e, or “twice exceptional”.

Yes. Invaluable ≠ prerequisite for good therapy, which is how you've been framing things.

If the implicit assumption here is that trauma is universal - how unhelpful. What one person calls trauma, another calls life experiences. That doesn't deny the impact, but fragmentation after trauma (little or big T) is a potential outcome. So integration is not always needed, nor does it have to happen through therapy.