fewer recessions, more regressions / tweets reflect the opinion of you & your institution

Washington, DC
Joined August 2023
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
And child neglect, but yes
93
2,468
Yea I also would have expected more/recognizable disemployment, but I don’t see it
3
46
You’re looking at a somewhat volatile time series, picking a sharp spike, and then saying the <5pp decrease after that is a legitimate trend. If you were to smooth things, it looks much better now.
1
57
Per your other point about LFP (though I’m not sure it’s the metric we should look at), is your position that junior hiring as been cooked since ‘08, and thus can’t be explained by AI?
1
9
450
If you see a “downward trend since 2023” I’m afraid you’re grasping at straws
3
12
572
They do call it paternalism
56
3,382
Replying to @jack_whitcomb_
Gdp growth will be 2% regardless
1
34
Replying to @TomBradyDaily
28-2 in 12 games
1
202
Andrew Gelman has to be the highest variance blogger of all time. That’s all.
3
226
Replying to @landvaluetax
How much do you own?
1
103
This would be better than most
5
210
Replying to @captgouda24
I just realized that this had actually been the first thing I’d ever read by Hall.
4
562
Replying to @slipflipdip
What makes writing strictly unsolvable? Yes, the writing is currently bad.
2
2
193
Replying to @nominalthoughts
I agree broadly. Like I’m not depressed or anything, but I think the original points are probably true
3
146
Replying to @RandomImport
Healthcare lol
1
9
821
Replying to @klntsky
The difference is that being surpassed by an infinitely replicable machine means what you were good at is now free/valueless
1
1
30
788
Replying to @fixedfrontier
Hmm I wouldn’t say it’s an ego thing because it’s not primarily about signaling. It’s about the value of my primary passion being eroded
33
Replying to @anionization
Difference is between what you’re doing now and econ RA-ing or between econ RA-ing and industry/finance generally?
1
348