protechtor retweeted
A bear trap immediately followed by a spring board
This is not something to be taken casually
This can be powerful
$BTC
protechtor retweeted
🚨NEW: The @CFTC has submitted its crypto rulemaking to the White House for review.
The proposed rule is titled “Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions and Regulation Crypto Asset Markets.”
It comes just two days after @ChairmanSelig said the agency was “locked in and ready to ship rules” following the Senate’s failure to advance crypto market structure legislation.
JUST IN: The CFTC sends a new crypto market structure proposal to the White House for review days after the CLARITY Act's Senate failure, moving swiftly on Chair Selig's promise to use existing authorities to regulate crypto markets.
protechtor retweeted
🚨 TODAY: The SEC issued an order granting temporary, conditional exemptive relief to Tokenized Securities Venues from the definition of “exchange” in the Exchange Act to trade tokenized NMS stock using innovative permissioned automated market makers and liquidity pools.
protechtor retweeted
The incumbent Democrat Senators who: (a) opposed the Clarity Act; and (b) are running for re-election THIS YEAR are:
Markey (Mass.)
Hickenlooper (Colorado)
Coons (Delaware)
Ossoff (Georgia)
Booker (NJ)
Lujan (NM)
Merkley (Oregon)
Reed (Rhode Island)
Warner (Virginia)
protechtor retweeted
1/ This one stings. Our team gave everything we had to get the Clarity Act across the finish line. So did most of the industry. This was an opportunity bigger than Ripple or one company - we did this for the industry, for consumers and to cement the US’s position as the crypto capital of the world and as a leader in the future of finance. Ultimately, consumers and U.S. competitiveness got left behind.
2/ A post mortem needs to be done on why this failed (more from me on that in the days ahead). The politics of the democrats (the anti-crypto army) was elevated over good policy.
3/ There is still reason for optimism for crypto in the United States. Now, the SEC, under Chair Atkins, and the CFTC, under Chair Selig, will continue to work hard to issue rules to fill the legislative gap and we will continue to be actively engaged in that rule making process.
4/ Ripple's business has never been stronger — real demand across traditional finance and the digital asset ecosystem. A missed vote in Washington doesn't change our momentum, our global footprint, or our customers.
protechtor retweeted
The banking industry strikes again. Banks have caused more damage to Americans than most other industries.
Inbox: Just about every banking group has joined forces on a letter explaining why the latest text of the Senate crypto bill doesn't do enough to address their concerns over stablecoin yields.
"A circuit breaker that activates only after substantial deposit flight has already occurred is not a safeguard at all."
protechtor retweeted
Great find. The arguments being made today are almost identical to those made about money market funds in 1980.
“Money market mutual funds are diverting funds from many of our nation's communities with the effect of increasing credit costs while diminishing credit availablity.…The growing seriousness of this funds diversion problem, combined with the fact that money market mutual funds are not subject to the same regulation and supervision imposed on banks…”
Many of us have mentioned how the stablecoin yield debate playing out in Clarity, and the arguments made against yield by the bank trades, mirror the battle over money market funds in the 1970s. Well here's some proof.
Here's a letter submitted by the Independent Bankers Association of America (a predecessor to the ICBA) in a 1980 hearing of the Senate Banking committee on money market funds.
As you can see, many of their arguments against stablecoins are almost verbatim a copy from what they argued back then: threat to deposits, harms lending, uniquely dangerous for smaller banks.
And we know today that argument was dead wrong. Money market balances grew parabolically into the trillions, and yet banks remain flush with deposits.
protechtor retweeted
Republican Senator @SenThomTillis of North Carolina breaks his silence on the ethics provision sent back from the White House and reveals how he’ll vote today.
protechtor retweeted
I’ve said many times that the CLARITY Act is essential to ensuring America wins the global race for new technology. That’s the reason Congress passed the GENIUS Act: to ensure that stablecoin infrastructure, a revolutionary financial technology, will be built in America.
Ensuring that America’s community bank sector continues to thrive has been a constant focus of mine since day one. And the administration’s dual focus on enabling new digital technology to flourish and appropriately tailoring community bank regulation is key to both sectors driving U.S. economic growth together over the next several decades.
The final draft of the CLARITY Act furthers this mission. It gives the Secretary of the Treasury additional authority to act if the facts around deposit flight change to the detriment of community banks. If stablecoins cause harm to community banks, I will not hesitate to use these tools to ensure they remain fully protected. Community banks are essential to U.S. economic performance and Main Street growth. Economic security is national security, and community banks play a major role in this principle.
protechtor retweeted
I genuinely believe that $CVX will be one of the best R/R investments one can make during this next expansion phase of the crypto cycle due to it's combo of massive upside potential on price and the consistent biweekly yield paid out along the way, and so, I've put my money where my mouth is for a fun little experiment:
Today, I've publicly locked 25,000 $CVX (~$50,000) tokens which will unlock in about 4 months. I don't necessarily believe that the full run will be complete in 4 months, so odds are I will end up re-locking it at the end of this term.
But for now, I will publicly track the appreciation of this position, keeping track of both 1. price appreciation over time and 2. yield earned over time.
I fully expect this position to be worth north of $2,000,000 by the time I'm ready to cash out- and this doesn't include the yield that I will also earn along the way.
With that said, let the game begin!
protechtor retweeted
$XRP is up ~30% in 2 days
Last time we saw a >30% move in 48hr was March
As usual, Upbit is leading the $ push
However, Kraken has the largest volume normalized net buy flow
One month ago, I said a trend shift is probable in the near future and here we are ripple:native
Reclaiming $1.30s is really all that matters right now
That would be considered a structure shift and would also gain the 6M rVWAP again
As we speak, the orderbooks remain incredibly clean for bulls
protechtor retweeted
Annual ~15% emissions reduction on $CRV triggers in around 2 days 🤔😌
protechtor retweeted
👑Curve’s next emission cut lands in 2 days.
This will be the 7th reduction which will bring ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 ’s annual inflation rate down to just 4.02%.
Hardcoded, predictable and steadily making the token scarcer year after year.
@CurveFinance
protechtor retweeted
BREAKING: The odds of a September rate hike fall to 40% after the US economy unexpectedly posts its 3rd biggest monthly job loss since the pandemic in 2020.
Just days ago, markets saw at 70%+ chance of a September rate hike.
Gold prices are surging above $4,400/oz on the news.
🤝 Paid partnership
protechtor retweeted
Should the Senate vote on the Clarity Act?
93%YES
7%NO
44,723 votes • Final results protechtor retweeted
In COT Report data, the non-commercial (large spec) traders of Bitcoin futures are the smart money, because so few traders qualify as "commercials". They are at a record net long position as of last week's data.
protechtor retweeted
More than a year ago, the House passed the Clarity Act.
There’s been progress since — thousands of hours of bipartisan negotiations took place at the staff and Member levels. The Senate Committees on Banking and Agriculture advanced their respective titles. And Senate Republicans produced a floor-ready product that, as I type this, is waiting for a vote.
It’s disappointing — but not surprising — that Senate Democrats are choosing politics on the cusp of a major victory for American leadership. Find another instance in history where Congress, when given the choice, opted to push an industry out of the United States rather than smartly regulate it. American Exceptionalism was once a bipartisan goal; if Clarity fails, I have serious doubts.
These same Democrats — many of whom have taken millions of dollars from the crypto industry — proclaim that Clarity lacks safeguards for consumers and falls short in countering illicit finance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Titles II and III materially uplift regulatory and compliance obligations for digital asset intermediaries, placing them on similar footing with traditional financial institutions. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act — which Washington lobbyists have spun up as a boogeyman for certain groups of prosecutors and law enforcement — does nothing other than codify longstanding Treasury Department policy that’s remained consistent across Administrations: non-custodial builders and developers are not, and have never been, subject to registration obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. And at this point, major law enforcement trades that once opposed the bill, including the Fraternal Order of Police, have now endorsed it.
The Senate needs to vote NOW on this landmark legislation. The truth is that Senate Democrats are afraid to advance the Clarity Act as they fear Senator Warren and the “Anti-Crypto Army” she once promised to build. In the days ahead, Leader Thune will put this theory to the test. Will Senate Democrats be on the side of American Exceptionalism, or will they opt to cede American leadership of a global industry for fear of the bespectacled squirrel’s Left flank?
America will lead or America won’t. It’s not more complicated than that. I believe Satoshi once said it best:
“If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry.”












































