Replying to @blazedfree
This incident occurred at the University of Michigan, not Michigan State University.
2
98
David O'Connell retweeted
Replying to @MSU_Football
Michigan Week…It’ll never be over, it’s just getting started”. Go Green!
David O'Connell retweeted
The powers that be have slowly and purposefully eroded so much of the tradition, regionalism, community and rivalry-focused nature of the sport that this was only inevitable. What used to feel quaint, clubby and quirky has become cold and corporate. Television rules everything including the pace of play. Roster turnover means fans barely know their team. Athletic departments treat longtime loyal fans—the ones who show up no matter what, until they are pushed too far—dismissively at best and poorly at worst. Everything is about the playoff; that was never the point. Will always love the sport but it’s not what it was even 10 years ago and barely recognizable to 25 years ago.
David O'Connell retweeted
Strongly disagree. Baseball on the radio is so purely American that it should be preserved even if the audience is relatively small, because it’s just something that should always be there.
Replying to @DavidPSamson
@DavidPSamson says MLB no longer needs radio: "We don't need baseball on radio anymore." The former Marlins president predicts on Nothing Personal that "radio will go the way of Kodak and Blockbuster." @JohnMamola has more. #MLB
barrettmedia.com/2026/10/28/…
David O'Connell retweeted
If I was going to pretend to be something online it sure in hell wouldn't be a lawyer. Personally I think this job mostly sucks and you are constantly surrounded by a bunch of evil super villain dorks
David O'Connell retweeted
really excited to see a QB - one I spent two years watching struggle to take a snap correctly - look like prime Tommy Frazier this afternoon in Spartan Stadium.
god hates Michigan State and the quicker you accept that, the easier life becomes
David O'Connell retweeted
Have seen lots of reaction to the ESPN series on Nick Saban. A lot of history, reported then and subsequently (wrote a book on this, in fact), has been forgotten:
Saban left MSU in 1999 for two reasons, both tied to then-President Peter McPherson. McPherson had welched on a $150,000 (not $100,000) raise committed to Saban. The stock market in the late '90s boomed and McPherson did not believe he could sell that raise to the MSU Board of Trustees. Saban then was making less than Tom Izzo.
That violation of pure financial principle set the stage for Saban at least listening to another offer, even though he and Terry through their coaching stops had always most loved East Lansing, had wanted to return there, and most definitely wanted to stay in November, 1999.
Another factor was McPherson's indifference to Saban's coaching. Even though the president had not been to a college football game between his college days and his arrival as MSU president, he "didn't believe Saban was a good second-half coach." True appraisal.
What might have been considered by the president, even if he had been on firm ground -- and he certainly wasn't -- is that in 1998 the Spartans had only 71 players on scholarship within a roster's 85-man limit. That was due to attrition inherited from George Perles' NCAA probation sentence. Small wonder some second-half leads in 1998 had washed away.
By 1999, Saban had a full scholarship roster, and a 10-2 record.
But the tensions and intolerances had grown too severe, and Saban was at least open to LSU's offer. Even after Terry visited Baton Rouge and told him it was a "diamond in the rough" they were going to stick in East Lansing. A long night of talking and not sleeping preceded a 5:30 a.m. phone call from McPherson who, in Saban's view, was "belligerent" and insisted Saban wasn't going to put MSU over a barrel.
The Sabans decided at that moment to leave for Baton Rouge.



























