Olivier retweeted
QUELLE INCROYABLE SURPRISE !!!!
(non)
lexpress.fr/societe/un-domma…
Olivier retweeted
Il ne serait peut-être pas inutile pour les prétendus "journalistes" de Libé, Télérama, Le Nouvel Obs et autres médias obsédés par Israël, de visionner mon film qui revient avec un peu moins de pudeur que Fauda Saison 5 sur les atrocités du 7 octobre. Mais ce n'est qu'un documentaire, donc éloigné de leur monde imaginaire. Ci-dessous, la version française.
Olivier retweeted
After 9 years… and 3 BILLION miles… this is what we found 😳
For decades, Pluto was just a blurry dot in the sky.
But everything changed when NASA’s spacecraft finally arrived…
🚀 After an incredible journey across the Solar System,
we got our first close-up look at Pluto’s frozen world ❄️
🏔️ Massive ice mountains
🌌 Vast frozen plains
🌫️ A thin, mysterious atmosphere
This isn’t just a rock…
it’s a complex, active world at the edge of our Solar System.
✨ And the craziest part?
This data was sent back from billions of miles away…
taking hours just to reach Earth.
From a tiny dot… to a breathtaking world.
That’s the power of space exploration 🚀
#Pluto #NASA #SpaceExploration #NewHorizons #SolarSystem #Astronomy #Universe #Science #SpaceFacts #DeepSpace
Olivier retweeted
♦️ Après 9 ans de voyage et 3 milliards de miles parcourus, la sonde New Horizons de la NASA nous a offert cette image saisissante.
🏔️ Les montagnes glacées de Pluton.
À plus de 5 milliards de kilomètres de la Terre, un monde lointain… et pourtant incroyablement spectaculaire. ❄️🪐
#Pluton #NASA #NewHorizons #Espace #Astronomie
Olivier retweeted
Un des champions européens à suivre...
Lovable confirms new $13.3B valuation, raises another $400M 👉 techcrunch.com/2026/08/12/lo…
Olivier retweeted
Ariel Bibas aurait eu 7 ans aujourd’hui.
Nous ne l’oublierons jamais 🕯️
#TOUS7Octobre
Comme pour Jordan et les @chicagobulls lors du premier triplé après le back-to-back, maintenant on vise le « 3peat »! Allez @PSG_inside !!!
Olivier retweeted
Il y a quelques jours est sorti le film "L’Abandon", consacré au sort tragique de Samuel Paty.
Je ne sais pas bien comment le dire, car dans ce genre de situation, nous autres enseignants sommes souvent contraints au silence. Pourtant, je me sens obligé de parler. Même si c’est risqué.
Il y a quelques mois, à l’entrée du site où j’enseigne, dans le 5e arrondissement, j’ai découvert des tags : « Mort à Hanouna », « Mort aux Sionistes », « Free Gaza ». La routine, hélas.
Ce jour-là, mon cours portait sur l’écologie appliquée. En entrant en classe, j’ai quand même osé faire une petite introduction. J’ai expliqué que ces slogans mettaient notre école en danger et qu’il valait mieux éviter des propos aussi extrêmes. J’imaginais un consensus rapide, avant de passer au véritable sujet du cours : la mémoire et la résilience des écosystèmes.
À ma grande surprise, une partie des étudiants m’a ouvertement contesté. Certains ont affirmé que « les Juifs avaient mérité leur sort », que Hanouna était d’extrême droite et que les musulmans étaient les véritables victimes, persécutées « par le système ». Je suis resté sans voix, déboussolé.
Je leur ai rappelé qu’il s’agissait de menaces de mort. Plusieurs ont préféré quitter le cours plutôt que d’engager le débat.
Je suis perdu face à cette nouvelle génération.
Quelques jours plus tard, j’ai compris que ma hiérarchie ne me soutenait pas vraiment. Des étudiants « susceptibles » s’étaient plaints de ce que j’avais osé dire. On me l’a fait savoir, on me l’a reproché.
C’est perturbant.
Bien sûr, dans le cadre d’un cours scientifique, j’aurais sans doute dû me taire, baisser la tête et faire comme si je n’avais rien vu en entrant dans l’établissement.
Pourtant, quelque chose en moi me dit que non.
Et le sort de Samuel Paty me parle.
Comment oser se taire ?
Olivier retweeted
Steve Jobs on why stories outlast technology:
In a rare reflective moment, Steve Jobs explained why he saw content as fundamentally different from the technology business he had spent his career in.
"You can hardly find an Apple 2 around too much anymore. You still can in the schools, but that's about it. It's not clear whether you'll be able to boot up a Macintosh 5 years from now or not."
He continues:
"All these technology boxes and all this software, you know, if it has a life of a year or two you're very lucky. If it has a life of five years it's extraordinary. And every once in a while something has a life of 10 to 15 years, and I've been lucky to be associated with a few of those products as well. But sooner or later they all become part of the sedimentary layer, which is the foundation for new innovation."
Then Jobs contrasts this with the world of storytelling, using a personal example:
"Disney released its first animated feature film Snow White in 1937. That's 60 years ago. And I have a young son. We got it and he loved it. He watched it 30, 40 times. And it really struck me that I know people on most of the continents of this world, I think everyone I know knows the story of Snow White. I don't think I know one person who hasn't seen it."
Watching his son experience a 60-year-old film led Jobs to a deeper realisation:
"It really hit me that these stories renew themselves with each generation of young children. You read Joseph Campbell. I mean these are our myths. And here's something that's 60 years old that's regenerating itself in my son and other young children."
This is what convinced him that Pixar was building something different from anything he'd worked on before:
"I think people are going to be watching Toy Story in 60 years. Not because of the computer graphics, but because of the story about friendship. That's something really amazing to me. Something very different than the industry I worked in in the past."
Olivier retweeted
🎨 Adobe Firefly devient conversationnel et pilote toute la Creative Cloud en langage naturel.
"Retouche cette photo, génère 3 variantes, exporte en 4K" → fait.
Le design entre dans l'ère agentique.
techcrunch.com/2026/04/15/ad…
Olivier retweeted
I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies.
The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage.
I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale.
Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal:
"If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded."
I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point.
Let me explain what I meant by nationalization.
I meant it.
I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion.
The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies.
I am talking about the other companies.
Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract.
The company that got the contract was OpenAI.
OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway.
Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product.
I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can.
The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same.
The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books.
Here is the thing I want you to understand.
I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product.
The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur.
The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat.
I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up.
The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes.
What I described is already happening.
























