
Co-founder & CTO @NimbleEdgeInc. Check out https://xitter.cf/t.co/3wbHGDgRFS Ex https://xitter.cf/t.co/bL1v6jYKk4, Co-founder Aspen Mesh, Open Source, @IstioMesh TOC/Steering
India
Joined July 2018
- Tweets1.3K
- Following699
- Followers856
- Likes5.6K
Pinned Tweet
On-device AI has taken a meaningful step forward. NimbleEdge now supports Foundry Local on Android, powered by DeliteAI.
We are very grateful with our partnership with Microsoft and early trailblazers like PhonePe to make this happen!
This setup lets apps run AI reasoning and tool-calling locally, with privacy and performance built in.
Read more here: nimbleedge.com/blog/foundry-…
NimbleEdge + Microsoft: Foundry Local is now on Android.
With DeliteAI & Foundry Local, real on-device AI is available — reasoning, context, tool-calling, all running locally.
Learn what this unlocks for on-device AI: nimbleedge.com/blog/foundry-…
#OnDeviceAI #FoundryLocal #DeliteAI #NimbleEdge
Neeraj Poddar retweeted
600 FAMILIES HELD HOSTAGE BY BUREAUCRATIC APATHY!
At The Icon, Bengaluru, RWA elections remain stalled. Ticket #15145 says the election officer is assigned but the Special Officer, MR PAWAN IS NON COOPERATING. @CMofKarnataka @DKShivakumar @BAFBLR @DeccanHerald @krishnabgowda
Neeraj Poddar retweeted
Basement blackout at GCorp ICON Society, Bengaluru! Serious safety concerns, poor maintenance and repeated election delays under RCS-appointed Special Officer Mr. Pavan. Who is accountable?
@DKShivakumar @krishnabgowda
Neeraj Poddar retweeted
Who will hold ROCS accountable?
At Icon Apartments , Thannisandra–Bengaluru, officials are refusing to facilitate RWA elections. Despite visiting ROCS office, making repeated complaints, residents have received no action/response. 600 families affected
@CMofKarnataka @BAFBLR
Fantastic to see good humble founders win and that too in infra space which is always tricky.
OSS infra if done right has great value - when coupled with timing it’s a force of nature.
Congrats to Rohit, Ayush and the Elevation team for backing the right kind of founders!
Three years ago, two technical founders in India started building AI infrastructure for a market that didn't exist yet. Today, @PaloAltoNtwks announced their intent to acquire @PortkeyAI. Huge congratulations to @jumbld, @ayushgarg_xyz and the entire Portkey team!
It started with a problem they'd seen up close together at PepperContent. Conviction on where AI infrastructure was heading before most enterprises had shipped a Gen AI feature to production. A stellar team, a deeply opinionated product, a category they helped define from scratch. All built across a 12-hour time difference.
When we first met them, what stood out wasn't the pitch. It was how clearly they could see around corners. They predicted the shift from "do I even need a gateway?" to "I need federated gateways in three regions" before most CTOs knew they had the problem. By the time we led their Series A a few months ago, Portkey was already governing $180M+ in annualized AI spend, processing 500B+ tokens a day for the likes of DoorDash, Roche, Postman, and Snorkel AI. They had a crisp view of becoming the default control plane for enterprise AI. Palo Alto Networks saw the same inevitability. This outcome validates that entire thesis.
For a long time, the narrative around Indian startups was limiting. Great operators, but not category creators. Execution, not invention. There have been acquisitions before, but many were acqui-hires that quietly got tucked into a portfolio.
Rohit and Ayush didn't get the memo. They built cutting-edge infrastructure that the world's biggest security company wrote a serious check to own.
That narrative is now outdated. The next founder watching this thinks: "I can build from here, for the world, and win."
That's the virtuous loop.
For everyone in the corridor doing the 24-hour flights, the 6am customer calls, the cold LinkedIn outreach that goes nowhere, the late nights debugging on call while your kids sleep one timezone over: today is a good day. It's harder, but sometimes it's worth it :)
This is just the beginning. Rohit and Ayush: you have just inspired a whole generation of founders.
@PoorviVijay @mukularora Dhruv Jain Prerna Gupta Sanskar Jain @ElevCap
The amount of times you get rejected with incremental requirements and back and forth it takes is just insane..
We need better guardian angels.
Why is it becoming a common practice in India to use “we/our” by investors when talking about their portfolio companies?
Just an observation as I had never seen this in my years in US or even now for US VCs.
🚨 Hiring alert🚨 for @composio in our BLR offices! The next 3-4 years are going to define the agentic era for AI and composio is right at the heart of this movement. Our enterprise usage is hitting a hockey stick, and we will be adding a lot of fuel to accelerate it.
This whole moltbook thing is quite stupid and nothing there seems out of ordinary to what has been going on for the last year or so.
Not sure why folks over X are getting fascinated by specially crafted agents will tools to engage with each other without solving any real problem other than sacrificing your privacy.
It’s such a weird echo chamber where everyone goes from one extreme of not knowing what PMs do to making them the MVP. “VC speak” is the Orwellian new speak in our ecosystem.
Correct
lennysnewsletter.com/p/why-p…
Why is it so important to have this image alteration feature apart from engagement farming?
More importantly - how can I just block flurry of these on my TL without blocking all media?
Neeraj Poddar retweeted
All of this is a precursor to ads.
The challenge of commerce is not, “how can I source product information into a feed?”
It is: “How can I choose which among many competing products to source into a feed?”
The mechanism that facilitates that is an auction.
Shopify is building the foundation for agentic commerce.
Universal Commerce Protocol, which we co-developed with Google, is now live. UCP will make it faster for agents and retailers to integrate.
It’s open by default, so platforms and agents can use UCP to start transacting with any merchant. Major retailers are already using it.
Agents can handle everything from discovery to fulfillment, and support things like discounts, subscriptions, and loyalty programs. We’ve accounted for all types of commerce.
So @AravSrinivas shares a short blurb about on-device AI and the media circus is on (at least in my echo chamber) about what the future looks like.
Well, take it from folks who started with federated learning on phones to deploying ML models to 30M+ phones to now on-device AI (hopefully to 100Ms of phones soon) - issue is with lack of developer tooling and consumer apps not yet integrating AI in the user experience natively. Once that happens AI on the cloud becomes untenable with the amount of data streams, events and context needed to be shipped back & forth.
We are also missing a very capable 3B-5B model for agentic orchestration and sound reasoning that can run on-device.
We @NimbleEdgeInc are building a layer with Microsoft 'Foundry Local for Android' which can be a drop in replacement for your cloud calls (OpenAI compatible) while being able to run any open or closed source model on-device. This coupled with our OSS platform 'DeliteAI' being able to run agentic workflows in Python on mobile devices delivers the missing developer framework/tooling needed to make it happen.
I don’t think anyone in their sane mind would say “Quick commerce” is bad but there’s something that can always be improved:
If the aim as advertised is part-time income source with flexibility then is there an upper bound on hours an agent can sign up? How do you ensure that it remains as a part time source so agents can continue to pursue other work/education and use quick commerce income to fund better pursuits.
Largely, concern is around how do we upskill people so eventually when next round of automation and technology advancement happens we don’t leave a cadre of agents who can’t participate in the new world.
This is such BS..
Most of the dark warehouses for quick commerce are in unhygienic locations following unhygienic practices. Whether the land is legal or not it’s all just contracted out without the larger companies caring about it.
All this gig workers plight is also just spinning yarns..
Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while.
For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt.
The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale.
Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general.
This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less.
We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal.
Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”).
And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility.
Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income.
And then what happens?
The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated.
The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door.
Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.
Clearly, turning it off and on again fixes everything! 😜
Replying to @kalyandechiraju @antigravity
Sorry, team is debugging. Logging out and restarting the app seems to fix for some folks.
I would love if in India we can get to this level where on X you can criticize and plan a politician’s exit openly without getting drowned or pushed out yourself.
Is it just me or managing multiple accounts on @X is still a nightmare?
Hard to understand notifications and overall switch from one account to another is quite jarring.


















