Pinned Tweet
For everyone who wants to trade at low cost, please use my referral link.
bitvavo.com/invite?a=832D7B5…
👀 #IOTA
🚨 AGAIN TuringCerts 🤦♂️ — this time, entering Artificial Intelligence.
TuringCerts + #IOTA are heading for massive adoption in 2027: banking, insurance, cybersecurity, professional education, digital identity… and now AI. 🤖
🇩🇪 At IFA Berlin, Turing Space signed an MoU with neuland.ai and PolyCrypt to bring verifiable identity and permissions to AI agents operating inside regulated enterprises. And this is not a small experiment: neuland.ai is developing enterprise AI alongside names such as STACKIT and Cisco, while RÖDL is deploying its platform internationally.
What are they trying to achieve? To let companies delegate tasks to AI agents without giving them free rein: each agent would have a verifiable identity and clearly defined permissions specifying what it can do, on whose behalf, and for how long.
In short: keeping AI under control. 🔒🤖
🔐 Turing Space → digital identity + Verifiable Credentials for humans and AI agents
🔐 PolyCrypt → cryptographic authorisation + key management @PolyCrypt_
🤖 neuland.ai → enterprise AI orchestration
Will the TuringCerts news stop here? 👀 No. 🇺🇦 Ukraine. 🇯🇵 Japan. 🇨🇭 Switzerland. 🇩🇪 Germany. 🇹🇼 Taiwan… Ahem…🤫👀🤐 there are still a few things left to talk about. 🤫
#IOTA #TuringCerts #PolyCrypt #NeulandAI #AI #AgenticAI
neuland.ai/en/company/news/r…
👀 #IOTA
👀 #IOTA 👍
🚨 DEEPER DIVE INTO THE MOST VALUE-CAPTURE COIN/TOKEN SO FAR: $IOTA
I went back into IOTA because I wanted to know something deeper:
WHO is actually using this infrastructure?
Not narratives.
Not random partnerships.
Not “blockchain could be used for trade.”
I wanted the actual institutions, governments, trade systems and tokenization activity.
🥶 And IOTA may have the strongest overall value-capture structure we’ve investigated so far.
Look at what sits around the ecosystem:
🇰🇪 Kenya Revenue Authority
🇰🇪 KenTrade
🌍 AfCFTA Secretariat
🌐 World Economic Forum
🏢 TradeMark Africa
🪪 GLEIF
🇬🇧 UK border/trade programs
🇦🇪 UAE regulatory sandbox participants
⛏️ Critical-mineral tokenization
📄 Tokenized trade documents
🏦 Trade-finance infrastructure
🌎 Cross-border commerce
This isn’t just payments.
IOTA/TWIN is working on connecting:
PHYSICAL GOODS
⬇️
DIGITAL IDENTITY
⬇️
VERIFIED TRADE DOCUMENTS
⬇️
CUSTOMS
⬇️
TOKENIZED OWNERSHIP
⬇️
COLLATERAL
⬇️
TRADE FINANCE
⬇️
PAYMENT / SETTLEMENT
THAT is what caught me.
A shipment of minerals, food, flowers or other goods can potentially become a digitally verified economic object.
The documents can be tokenized.
The parties can be identified.
The government records can be verified.
The asset can potentially become collateral.
Then financing and settlement can happen around it.
Now here is where my investigation gets even more important:
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION ≠ TOKEN VALUE CAPTURE.
So does $IOTA actually participate?
YES.
Transactions on IOTA require $IOTA for gas.
🔥 Part of transaction fees are burned.
🔒 Onchain objects require IOTA storage deposits.
🛡️ Validators stake $IOTA to secure the network.
That creates an actual economic relationship between:
GLOBAL TRADE ACTIVITY → NETWORK USAGE → $IOTA
That is what I’ve been searching for.
Not simply:
“Banks like the technology.”
I want to see:
IF THE TECHNOLOGY WINS, DOES THE TOKEN HAVE A REASON TO WIN WITH IT?
With IOTA, I can actually see the mechanism.
Now I’m not calling it perfect.
I still want to see much larger production volumes, named global banks running major trade-finance flows and enough network activity for fee burns to meaningfully compete with token issuance.
But based on everything I’ve investigated so far…
🥶 IOTA is currently one of the strongest — possibly THE strongest — combinations of institutional adoption + government integration + real-world usage + native token value capture that I’ve found.
And I’m not choosing favorites.
I’m following where the infrastructure is being built…
AND where the economic activity can actually flow back into the token.
$IOTA 👀🔥
DYOR.
👀 #IOTA 👍
🚨 AGAIN TuringCerts 🤦♂️ — this time, entering Artificial Intelligence.
TuringCerts + #IOTA are heading for massive adoption in 2027: banking, insurance, cybersecurity, professional education, digital identity… and now AI. 🤖
🇩🇪 At IFA Berlin, Turing Space signed an MoU with neuland.ai and PolyCrypt to bring verifiable identity and permissions to AI agents operating inside regulated enterprises. And this is not a small experiment: neuland.ai is developing enterprise AI alongside names such as STACKIT and Cisco, while RÖDL is deploying its platform internationally.
What are they trying to achieve? To let companies delegate tasks to AI agents without giving them free rein: each agent would have a verifiable identity and clearly defined permissions specifying what it can do, on whose behalf, and for how long.
In short: keeping AI under control. 🔒🤖
🔐 Turing Space → digital identity + Verifiable Credentials for humans and AI agents
🔐 PolyCrypt → cryptographic authorisation + key management @PolyCrypt_
🤖 neuland.ai → enterprise AI orchestration
Will the TuringCerts news stop here? 👀 No. 🇺🇦 Ukraine. 🇯🇵 Japan. 🇨🇭 Switzerland. 🇩🇪 Germany. 🇹🇼 Taiwan… Ahem…🤫👀🤐 there are still a few things left to talk about. 🤫
#IOTA #TuringCerts #PolyCrypt #NeulandAI #AI #AgenticAI
neuland.ai/en/company/news/r…
Virtual Watch Tower,
Part of the Steering Committee
Jens Munch Lund-Nielsen (Head of Global Trade & Supply Chins at IOTA Foundation),
Announces a pilot that launched yesterdays with H&M. Using real shipments from Bangladesh to Sweden, running in parallel to the legacy system.
What a great news to start the weekend
🚨 Virtue isn’t dead. October could mark its return — rebuilt, redesigned and fundamentally different.
What happened was serious: ~24M IOTA compromised, dozens of liquidations and roughly 45 users affected. But the post-exploit picture may now look very different:
1️⃣ ~12M IOTA reportedly remain frozen on-chain.
2️⃣ ~6M IOTA appear to have been identified or blocked through exchanges/intermediaries.
3️⃣ ~6M IOTA appear to have been recovered.
A large share of the attacker’s position may therefore have become frozen, traceable or recovered.
Now the interesting part: what could change in Virtue itself?
🔹 USDT0 ↔ VUSD PSM to strengthen 1:1 stability.
🔹 Reduced dependence on the oracle architecture exposed by the exploit.
🔹 A redesigned VUSD stability mechanism.
🔹 Stronger oracle security, permissions and attack-surface controls.
🔹 A protocol rebuilt after the hardest stress test it could realistically face.
But Virtue may also have stress-tested something deeper than DeFi infrastructure: IOTA’s decentralization itself.
When users are hurt, capital is trapped and influential actors are involved, decentralization stops being a slogan and starts having a real cost. The real test is whether the rules still hold when changing them would be convenient. If even powerful actors cannot unilaterally impose an outcome, decentralization becomes tangible. And as influence keeps dispersing across more hands, IOTA may emerge from this episode more decentralized — and more resilient — than before.
If the reported October relaunch happens with a materially stronger architecture, this stops looking like just an exploit aftermath.
It starts looking like Virtue 2.0.
#IOTA #Virtue #DeFi #VUSD #USDT0
👀 #IOTA
🚨 WATCH KENYA. Something much bigger than it looks may be taking shape here.
IOTA/TWIN could be about to cross a critical line: from verifying real-world trade… to financing it.
☕ A first financing transaction tied to a Kenyan coffee export could take place as early as October.
And this is where it gets interesting. This isn’t about putting coffee “on a blockchain.” It’s about something far bigger:
📦 real-world goods
📑 verifiable trade documentation
🏛️ institutionally backed data
💰 upfront financing for exporters
📈 yield for capital providers
In other words: real trade → verified data → financeable asset → capital → yield.
And here’s the number that changes the scale of the story:🔥 IFC estimates Kenya’s Supply Chain Finance market at $24.8 BILLION. 👀Read that again. $24.8B.👀🤪🤯
The market TWIN could be positioning itself to enter is neither experimental nor small.
💣 BOMB #1: TWIN would no longer be just a supply-chain traceability layer.
💣 BOMB #2: trade data itself could become the foundation for originating financial products.
💣 BOMB #3: IOTA would be stepping directly into Trade Finance + RWA + Private Credit territory.
And potentially the biggest one:
💣 BOMB #4: if the model works, Kenya could start proving that public infrastructure built around IOTA can generate real commercial revenue.
Coffee may only be the first transaction. The real story is much bigger: IOTA may no longer be trying just to record the real economy. It may be trying to finance it.
#IOTA #TWIN #RWA #Coffee #ADAPT #USDT0 #Kenya
IOTA Mainnet Staking Report is now on v2.3-beta 💚
Validator rewards are separately tagged through the entire process.
▶️ Origin evidence: system epoch-change tx + matching staking event + created stake object
▶️ Gold-coin marker and Validator Rewards column on every relevant row (dynamic view)
▶️ Attribution carried through split, merge, transfer, active, claimed and withdrawn rows
▶️ Same tagging in monthly summaries
▶️ Commission stays a subset of delegated stake — not an extra balance, not mixed with staking rewards
With this release we are going into a feature freeze. The report now covers the full IOTA staking stack. We are in the final documentation, simulation and test phase.
We can reveal one thing already: the next version will no longer be a beta, and we are very proud to reach this point after a phase of development and learning that began with Genesis. Thank you to everyone joining us on this journey; we are truly proud to reach this upcoming milestone.
👀 #IOTA What can we expect?
IOTA-Mainnet: Rätselhafte Börse sammelt fast den gesamten USDT0-Bestand ein
kryptorevolution.de/unbekann…
#IOTA iota:native
👀 #IOTA 👍
A new chapter for Eastern Africa’s horticulture sector begins today
The Horticulture Council of Eastern Africa (HoCEA) has officially been launched in Nairobi, marking an important step towards stronger coordination and collective action across the region’s horticulture industry.
Opening the official launch, Dr @MkindiJackie, Chairperson of HoCEA, reflected on the need for a unified regional voice - one capable of bringing national priorities together and strengthening engagement with
governments, regional institutions and partners.
HoCEA now provides a platform to turn shared challenges into shared priorities, and regional priorities into coordinated action. But today is only the starting
point.
The measure of HoCEA’s impact will be what follows: Stronger collaboration, clearer advocacy and tangible
progress for growers, exporters and horticulture businesses across Eastern Africa.
The platform has been launched. Now, the focus shifts to delivery
#HorticultureTradeEA #HoCEA
neumis.iota 👍🚀 retweeted
Thanks @dlt_green for explaining the situation. For me "code is low" is a very important promise of DLT. Validators, who build the streets should not become the judicative and the police if cars on the ledger have an exident. If we start to open this box of the Pandora and begin to rewrite the ledger state, because of dApp issues, we loose a lot of trust in the blockchain world.
Brief context on Plan A and Plan B — and why your vote matters
On 28 August, a manipulated Switchboard oracle price feed triggered the liquidation of 45 healthy Virtue positions. About 23.2 million IOTA-equivalent in collateral and 455,103 VUSD of debt were involved. Virtue wants to make affected users whole. Two paths are on the table.
▶️ Plan A — Restore the positions
Positions would be rebuilt to their last clean pre-incident state: collateral back, original VUSD debt back. That requires access to restricted attacker assets and approval from community validators to handle those assets outside the normal spending rules.
That is the critical point. Plan A asks validators to intervene in already recorded ownership. For this case, that means giving up ledger immutability. What starts as an exception for 45 affected users becomes a precedent. Validators then become the body that decides after the fact whose transactions stand — and the network becomes a political instrument.
▶️ Plan B — Pay out net value
If the community proposal fails or returned assets are insufficient, Virtue pays each position’s pre-liquidation net value in IOTA: true collateral value minus VUSD debt. Portfolio estimate: about 11.54 million IOTA, finalized per account. No double compensation with Plan A.
Plan B keeps the ledger rule: only the key holder moves assets. Responsibility stays with Virtue and Switchboard, not with the network.
Sympathy for those affected does not change the order of principles. An application-layer failure must not be “fixed” by abandoning the core rule of the chain. Otherwise there is no point in having a ledger.
▶️ What you should do
1. Vote in our survey. 31 votes is not a reliable result.
2. Contact the validator you stake with. Delegating voting power is not the same as giving up your opinion — ask for theirs.
3. If your validator stays silent or takes a line you cannot support: restake.
#IOTA dApp operators should be aware that they may potentially be held liable for damages caused by their app. Users should always be aware that using such apps involves risks.
IOTA Foundation is now pushing, behind the scenes, to “touch” the very immutability of the IOTA protocol in order to repair the consequences of the Virtue incident. If so, that is not damage control. It is crossing a constitutional red line.
Changing the protocol ex post to reverse, seize or reassign assets affected by a dApp failure is not a “technical solution”. It is changing the rules of property after the event. Responsibility should remain at the layer where the risk originated: Virtue, its architecture, its oracle dependencies and its risk-management framework. Pushing that liability down to the L1 through an ad hoc protocol intervention would undermine infrastructure neutrality, transaction finality and the legitimate expectations of every participant relying on the network’s rules.
Yes, technically, a network can coordinate a hard fork. But technical feasibility is not the same thing as protocol legitimacy. If application-layer failures can be repaired by rewriting the settlement layer whenever the outcome becomes inconvenient, then immutability is no longer a property of the system; it becomes a privilege granted at someone’s discretion. And discretion at the consensus layer has another name: moral hazard.
Now, allow me one small theological heresy. In the beginning, IOTA, the IF and the entities building around them sometimes appeared almost as one and triune. But that Trinity belongs to the Genesis of the project. Today there should be only one protocol deity: IOTA itself.
The IF, Nakama, TWIN and every other organisation in the ecosystem are, at most, its angels. They may build, protect, evangelise and occasionally perform engineering miracles — but they do not get to rewrite the tablets of the law when one of their creations goes wrong.
An angel becomes a fallen angel — Lucifer, if you will — the moment it stops serving the order from which its authority derives and starts placing its own judgement above it. In blockchain, that original sin has a rather less poetic name: discretion over consensus.
And we already know how the story ends when an angel decides that its interpretation of justice outranks the law.
We do not need fallen angels.
We need the protocol to remain God. 💅🤖
#IOTA #Virtue #TWIN #IF #Lucifer
🚨Be careful.W
⚠️ RIESIGE PHISHING-ATTACKE!! ⚠️
Aktuell läuft eine massive Phishing-Welle gegen Bitcoin- und Krypto-Nutzer.
Ein offenbar kompromittierter Newsletter-Dienstleister – Brevo – wird von Angreifern genutzt, um täuschend echte Mails im Namen von @BitBoxSwiss, @Trezor, @Coin_Tracking und weiteren Unternehmen zu verschicken.
🚨 Das Gefährliche: Die Mails kommen teilweise sogar über die echten Absender-Domains und können dadurch die üblichen E-Mail-Authentifizierungen bestehen. Eine vermeintlich korrekte Absenderadresse ist aktuell also kein ausreichender Beweis, dass die Mail echt ist.
❌ Keine Links anklicken!
❌ Niemals eure 12/24 Wörter irgendwo eingeben!
✅ Bei Sicherheitswarnungen immer direkt die offizielle Website oder App öffnen.
Nach aktuellem Stand gibt es keine Hinweise darauf, dass die Wallets oder Kernsysteme von BitBox, Trezor & Co. gehackt wurden. Ob über die betroffenen Newsletter-Accounts möglicherweise Empfängerdaten abgegriffen wurden, wird noch untersucht.
👉 Aktuell gilt: Bei Krypto-Mails lieber einmal zu viel misstrauisch sein als einmal zu wenig.
Teilt die Nachricht, damit so viele wie möglich gewarnt werden!
