Bloody Immigrants in whiteface stealing our riots 🤣 or something.

Francoski protesti iz druge perspektive.

"You reduce crime by eliminating poverty." This is one of the greatest intellectual confusions of our century. It sounds compassionate. It feels obvious. And the moment you actually test it, it falls apart. Let's look at the data. First, the correlation is real. Nobody serious denies that poorer areas have more crime. In Sweden, kids from the poorest 20% of families are about 7 times more likely to be convicted of a violent crime than kids from the richest 20%. But correlation is not causation. So Swedish researchers did something brilliant: they compared siblings. Same parents, same home, same upbringing, but different family income at different points in their childhood, because parents' income moves over time. Result, on more than 500,000 children (Sariaslan et al., British Journal of Psychiatry, 2014): once you account for what's shared inside the family, the effect of income on violent crime goes from 7x to nothing. The hazard ratio drops to 0.95. No effect. Finland ran the same test on 650,000 people. Same result: the income-crime link disappears when you compare siblings. What predicts crime isn't the bank balance. It's what travels inside families. Second test: what happens when poverty spikes for everyone at once? 2008. US unemployment doubled from 5% to nearly 10%. 15% of Americans officially poor. If poverty creates crime, crime should have exploded. Instead it fell. Year after year. Robbery, the most "economic" crime of all, dropped 10% in 2010 alone. Criminologists literally said they were stumped. Same story in the Great Depression: 25% unemployment, and crime went down in many cities. Third test: take families out of poverty and see. The US government ran a randomized lottery called Moving to Opportunity. Thousands of families in public housing got vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods. For boys, violent arrests dropped at first, property crime arrests went up, and over time the effects faded. New zip code. Same behavior. Fourth: the claim that police don't matter. This one is just false. Chalfin et al. (American Economic Review: Insights, 2022): each additional police officer prevents about 0.1 homicides. And per capita, the lives saved are twice as many among Black victims as among white victims. The people who suffer most from "police don't matter" are the poorest neighborhoods. So what does predict crime? The Dunedin study followed 1,000 children from birth to age 32. Self-control measured between ages 3 and 11 predicted adult criminal convictions, even after controlling for social class and IQ (Moffitt et al., PNAS, 2011). Cognitive ability matters too: across 700,000 Swedish men, lower cognitive scores at 18 track with violent convictions, and the link barely moves when you control for childhood socioeconomic status (Frisell et al., 2012). And here's the part nobody quotes: in Dunedin, kids whose self-control improved over time did better than predicted. Behavior can change. Which means responsibility is real. Why does this matter? Because "poverty creates crime" isn't just wrong. It's toxic. It turns criminals into victims. The man who robbed you becomes a symptom of "the system," and you, the real victim, become a footnote in someone else's narrative. It merges two completely different things. "You're poor, we'll help you" is one policy. "You're poor and you committed a crime, so we'll excuse you" is another. Fusing them insults the millions of poor people who work, raise their kids, and never hurt anyone. The vast majority of poor people are not criminals. That alone kills the theory. It removes responsibility. Build a political system on "your circumstances made you do it" and you destroy the one thing that actually changes behavior: the certainty that you own your choices. Every excuse the state manufactures is an incentive. And it feeds the state forever. If every crime is a social failure, every crime justifies a new program, a new budget, a new agency. Crime becomes the business model of bureaucracy. The alternative is simple and old. A lighter state that protects instead of explains. The same rules for everyone, from the projects or from a gated community. Certain, swift punishment for anyone who commits a crime. And never, ever telling someone their crime was written in their social condition. Treating someone as responsible is respecting them. Excusing someone because they're poor is the most condescending thing you can do to them.

You can really feel their irritation that they aren't able to peddle this "the Third World Islamic immigrants are declaring war on the West!" bullshit with the Albanian riots

Slovenka, ki živi v Parizu: "Grozno je. Vlamljajo v trgovine, kradejo, zažigajo javno in zasebno lastnino. Preko 90% "protestnikov" je črnskega ali arabskega porekla, večinoma moškega spola, starosti med poznimi najstniškimi leti in poznimi 20. leti. Plina je bilo v zraku ogromno, ni bilo normalno za dihat." Več v @PlanetTV

If you wonder how it is possible that Germany spent €400bn on immigrants in just ten years, you need to understand how dysfunctional and absurd some things in Germany are. Here are just a few examples that sound pretty unbelievable, but are true. I am really not joking, this is how some things seriously work in Germany: At the end of 2025 there were about 232,000 people in Germany who were legally required to leave , of whom the large majority were tolerated. Why are they tolerated? Because for example they cannot find their passport. They never lose their mobile phones, but missing passports is very common. Then if a new passport is finally issued and the court orders a deportation, only 40% of deportations get really executed. Don’t ask me why, that’s the official statistic. The funniest fact about Germany is, that one can be hiding from a police arrest warrant, but still collect welfare benefits each month. Yep, you read this right. German is known for still using fax machines and being a digital dessert. The welfare authorities don’t inform police about the location of the person under arrest warrant. Ok, another one. There was a famous case, where a known head of a gang terrorizing a German city, had four wives, countless children and was collecting €100k in welfare benefits for them, despite polygamy being illegal in Germany. Are you now able to better understand how Germany spent €400 billion on immigrants?

"Muslimani v Sloveniji želimo živeti v miru, vzgajati svoje otroke in prispevati k razvoju družbe; zakrivanje ženskega obraza z burko in nikabom v javnosti v slovenski družbi sploh ne obstaja in je samo populizem, ki je namenjen strašenju prebivalstva." rtvslo.si/slovenija/mufti-ne…

Tole mi je poslal oče drugošolke. To je delovni zvezek za 2. razred SLOVENSKE osnovne šole. Prepoznate vzorec?

Ok, jaz sem pripravljen plačevat dvojni prispevek, če Boris ne želi več. Ampak potem se mu doma blokira RTV. Torej, nič Planice, Pokala Vitranc in Zlate lisice, hokeja, rokometa, Živ žava, kolesarskih tekem, državnih proslav, Ljudje in Zemlja, Slovenske kronike...

Nova rubrika oddaje @TVOdmevi na nepristranski @RTV_Slovenija: osebni nagovori Roberta Goloba v kamero 1. Dolžina do ene minute, realizator Žiga Bonča.

Prešteli smo vse članke portala MMC RTV Slovenija o nedeljskih referendumih: 115 člankov, objavljenih od 20. avgusta do 9. oktobra. Stran PROTI je dobila 4,2-krat več besed kot stran ZA. Naslovov s stališčem strani PROTI je bilo 47, naslovov s stališčem strani ZA 6. Strokovnjake je RTV kot govorce navedel 30-krat na strani PROTI in niti enkrat na strani ZA. Največja razlika je pri temah o samem RTV-ju: 5,5-krat. Vsak članek, vsaka ocena in metoda so javni. Preverite sami: stehtajmo.si

- Dober dan, dajte nam vaš telefon, da ga pregledamo. - Imate nalog sodišča? - Ne rabimo. - Kako, ne rabite? - Ste nam dali pooblastila. Pa kar z nami, vidimo, da nekaj skrivate. 4xPROTI

Aleš Primc je na ministrstvu obesil križ. ⚫ Križ je obesil v službenih prostorih ministrstva v državi, kjer 7. člen ustave govori o ločitvi države od verskih skupnosti. Piše Luka Volk. buff.ly/VRzM7h7

ahh... zaradi tega ni več ljubljenček holivuda in levuharske propagande.. ..se spomnim kak je blo včasih ..v holivudu so se po kolenih plazili pred njim.. pol je pa v studie začel prihajati kitajski denarček.. je pa postal persona non grata..