Mat retweeted
🚨 TRUMP KNEW THEY WOULD CHEAT — 2026 EXPOSED FRAUD NATIONWIDE 🚨
What is the difference between this election and 2020? 2020 focused on fraud in some swing states. 2026 was completely different. This election exposed fraud nationwide.
How do you quickly change the entire election system in every state? Through a drawn-out fight for years in each state legislature, or expose the entire system to transform it at the federal level?
If the Save America Act had passed, Democrats would not have been able to cheat nationwide.
Some races in red states might still have been stolen, but nowhere near what we all witnessed in this election.
Deep red states went completely blue.
Democrats increased their vote totals by twenty million nationwide in a midterm election. You cannot just tell people. You have to show them.
Now the entire system has become a national security threat.
Mat retweeted
Now THIS woman is asking the exact correct question about this election .. “2,200 U.S counties all lunged left because of gas prices”
Yeah BIG FAT NOPE !
And then Trump just says “oh well, we tried”
😂😂 yeah again BIG FAT NOPE !
Something is brewing !!
Mat retweeted
I was one of the first people to call out the Massie/Epstein grift. I wish I could show you the DMs from accounts that came after me for questioning Massie. Many let me know that they liked my videos but were now very "disappointed" in me. 😂
Unlike them, I had watched all the hearings during the Biden years when Christopher Wray was asked about the Epstein case. Massie was in some of those hearings. Wray was asked numerous times about the Epstein case and he would respond to every question with "there is nothing more to share, but I'll check and let you know if I find anything."
Wray gave that answer every time he was asked. It was a complete blowoff. Massie watched. He never one time questioned Wray about Epstein and he had no follow up questions when Wray would casually dismiss questions about Epstein. Why? Because he didn't GAF back then. Just like the Democrats and the MSM.
It's crazy that there are still some people who are still pretending that this had anything to with the "survivors" and that it wasn't completely, from the start, about trying to hurt Trump.
Massie and Khanna were to the Epstein hoax what Schiff and Swalwell were to the Russia hoax. Massie was the Schiff type, sleazily parsing his words and allegations. Khanna was the retarded Swalwell type, spouting whatever ridiculous claims entered his head.
I created and posted a video of some of the claims Ro Khanna has made about Epstein and the Epstein files. It's absolutely pure comedy. All bullshit.
Most people aren't aware of how much time these two spent on TV together from June of 2025 to July of 2026. Schiff and Swalwell TV type time, both of them making ridiculous claims and none of it turned out to be true. They didn't do that because they "care about survivors." They did it to hurt the current President. Can we all stop pretending please?
Do you know that Thomas Massie has repeatedly said during interviews that he endorsed Trump because Trump promised to be transparent about the Epstein files? That's a pretty ridiculous lie, but it doesn't stop Massie from saying it.
Massie has also repeatedly claimed that "all of Trump's friends" are part of the Epstein class. What does that even mean? That's Adam Schiff saying "Trump loves the Russians."
Remember when Massie made that post implying that Trump started the Iran War to deflect from the Epstein files? After posting that Massie went on TV and claimed that he wasn't actually saying that but that OTHER people were saying it and that's why he posted it. More Adam Schiff type talk.
In November of 2025 Massie held a press conference and made these statements as facts:
▪️There are men who have never been investigated before who are co-conspirators of Epstein's and who are guilty of rape and sexual abuse.
Never been investigated before but are guilty. How could he know that to be true? How could he have possibly made that claim unless he saw proof, which would mean that he is now covering up those cases.
He also said:
▪️There are 1,000 victims of Epstein.
▪️There are at least 20 accusations of rape and sex trafficking that the FBI is covering up.
▪️When the Epstein files are released, all these men will be exposed and will go to prison.
▪️If the names of these guilty men are not released and they are not arrested, himself, MTG, or Democrats will read the names on the House floor.
Was any of that true or was he completely full of shit?
Thomas Massie is the Adam Schiff of Trump's second term. Just watch what he's doing right now.
Mat retweeted
The 2022-2024 43 state updated number of "New Registered Voters" registered WITHOUT proof of U.S. citizenship raises from 20,283,937...
To a STAGGERING 24,662,998 new registered voters registered without proof of U.S. citizenship.
Democrats coincidentally gained over 20 MILLION new voters within the same time period, while Republicans gained over a million new voters.
This tells you everything you need to know.
Mat retweeted
The Press wants Pete Hegseth removed because they know he is teamed with Q.
Nothing triggers the deep state more.
Mat retweeted
Mark Carney is carrying out a Cloward-Piven-style hostile takeover of Canada—deliberately overloading our welfare state, energy sector, housing, and debt with mass immigration and green mandates to crash the economy from within. This isn’t reform; it’s a calculated globalist assault to replace free enterprise and sovereignty with top-down control. Wake up and repost before it’s irreversible.
Mat retweeted
Remember what I was telling you right before the election.
Trump ALREADY knew exactly how they would cheat.
It was definitely algorithms in the machines but they ALSO needed a massive INCREASE in voter registrations.
The DOJ lawsuit in California EXPOSED how the democrats were going to cheat.
A massive INCREASE in voter registrations that did not “require” proof of citizenship.
Trump purposely started a court fight over 20,000 “noncitizens” voting in California, knowing that the number of “noncitizens” voting is much larger in California and across the country.
Trump knew the courts likely wouldn’t do anything to “stop” it BEFORE the election.
Most people took that as a loss in the courts, but it was a huge victory.
That decision was exactly what Trump wanted.
The democrats needed to “commit” the crime and the most important part of that lawsuit, was the Ninth Circuit slapping down the lower court, which was trying to prevent prosecution of election officials for breaking federal law.
The Ninth Circuit cleared the judicial branch out of the way because it is the Executive Branch’s Constitutional authority to “prosecute” federal crimes.
Courts can’t prevent the Executive Branch from enforcing federal laws.
That lawsuit set the table, to expose and overturn the ENTIRE election nationwide.
The democrats didn’t massively increase their voter registrations with illegals, they did it with “noncitizens” who are in the country “legally.”
Either visa, green card or temporary status immigrants.
That’s a huge number and they showed up for democrats because Trump is ALREADY in the process of deporting most of them.
But guess what?
It’s illegal for ALL “noncitizens” to vote in federal elections.
And Trump ALREADY has the full federal database of “noncitizens” with legal standing to compare to the voter registration totals and ballots.
Checkmate!
The 2022-2024 43 state updated number of "New Registered Voters" registered WITHOUT proof of U.S. citizenship raises from 20,283,937...
To a STAGGERING 24,662,998 new registered voters registered without proof of U.S. citizenship.
Democrats coincidentally gained over 20 MILLION new voters within the same time period, while Republicans gained over a million new voters.
This tells you everything you need to know.
Mat retweeted
This man is a Computer Scientist and he looked at my post regarding California’s identical election results for top government positions
🚨 He CONFIRMS from a computer scientist programming perspective how the results ARE FROM AN ALGORITHM, NOT REAL VOTE TOTALS 👇 IT’S RIGGED
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
Mat retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
Mat retweeted
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Mat retweeted
Hi. Want to see a murder on live TV?
I give you New White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller vs. Jake Tapper on CNN.
Tapper said we need illegals here to pick our crops.
Then, Fatality.
Mat retweeted
🇨🇦 CANADA’S GROCERY STORES HAVE DISCOVERED A CLEVER WAY TO CHARGE YOU MORE WITHOUT RAISING THE STICKER PRICE.
It’s called SHRINKFLATION.
Imagine this:
🥣 A 500g cereal box costs $5.
Next year, the box contains 425g.
The price? Still $5.
Congratulations.
YOU JUST PAID 17.6% MORE PER GRAM WITHOUT SEEING A PRICE INCREASE.
Now imagine this happening across your shopping cart.
🍫 Smaller chocolate bars.
🥔 Lighter bags of chips.
🧻 Fewer sheets of toilet paper.
🧴 Less detergent in the bottle.
🍪 Fewer cookies in the package.
And here’s the economic insult.
Your salary hasn’t necessarily increased.
Your grocery budget hasn’t increased.
But the amount of food and household essentials you’re bringing home has decreased.
Statistics Canada can capture shrinkflation in CPI through quantity adjustments, but shoppers often miss it when comparing shelf prices.
THE PRICE TAG TELLS YOU WHAT YOU PAY.
THE PACKAGE SIZE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU ACTUALLY GET.
Canada’s affordability crisis isn’t just about prices going up.
Sometimes it’s about getting less for the same money.
SAME PRICE. SMALLER PACKAGE. BIGGER BILL PER UNIT.
Welcome to the economy where even your groceries are downsizing.
🍁 @wealthmoose
#Canada #Inflation
Mat retweeted
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Mat retweeted
🚨🚨 I have just been informed by @ReawakenUSA CEO @realjamesowen that he was called by @UMich and asked to have my video of yesterday’s attack removed due to negative blowback on lunatic, Temulun Togochog
I’ll repost it every day until she’s expelled and charged.
Mat retweeted
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Elon Musk is a PART-TIME OWNER of CNN, and President Trump is reveling in it
Q: Should Elon Musk run CNN? 🤣
PRESIDENT TRUMP: "Well, I like it, certainly better than what we have right now!" — 47 to @bennyjohnson
How the tables have turned!
Mat retweeted
Delete this post. We witnessed an election being stolen in front of the whole world and you rush to congratulate the criminal who did it? Shameful, irresponsible.
Mat retweeted
‼️BREAKING - New report claims Canada is a target of "tamkeen" ... an Islamist entryism strategy
The report explains that Canada is explicitly NAMED as a target in the Muslim Brotherhood’s own 1982 “Project” and 1991 “Explanatory Memorandum.”
The strategy, tamkeen, means gradual institutional takeover from within.
No Canadian government has ever investigated these networks — unlike the US, UK, France, and Austria.
-Examples: Government entryism - A Muslim Federal Employees Network pushed for Muslims as a protected equity group. Islamophobia envoy Amira Elghawaby lobbied the CRA, Public Safety, CSIS, and deputy ministers on its behalf and proposed taxpayer funding.
-Electoral capture: The Canadian-Muslim Vote targeted 60–80 ridings. Their 2025 “Vote Palestine” campaign locked in endorsements from 344 candidates. Palestine was the #1 issue for Muslim voters in their own polls.
-Non-profits: CRA audits of MAC and ISNA Canada flagged Brotherhood alignment, foreign political activity, and terrorism-linked entities.
-Campus infiltration: University of Waterloo took >C$3.8M in Qatari funding , memorialized a former president of the Hamas-linked Islamic University of Gaza, and cut its Technion partnership under pressure while Qatari ties stayed.
Report by ISGAP
Mat retweeted
So Tesla does a demo of a car that climbs vertical, stops at the top of a loop, FLIES DOWN, then jumps some trucks doing a kick flip, and casually breaks the 1 second zero to sixty acceleration barrier...
Okay, that's some cool shit. Yes, we argue over the commercial practicality, but you've got to admit from just the sci-fi tech demo sense, that's wild.
So I scroll through the interwebs and the conservatives I know are gleeful and making jokes about flying cars, and the smart people are thinking through possible applications, limitations, and ways this wild shit could or could not get used in real life. The really smart people are arguing about engineering, but regardless everybody is like "damn, that's cool."
Meanwhile all the comments from terminally online liberals are crying about Elon's politics. All they can do is focus on one dude disagreeing with them. They can't get past it. All they can do is minimize. They have no imagination. No excitement. It's just so sad. They're so SMALL.
So the conversations are like-
"Wow they just did some Matchbox stuff with an actual car."
"That's nothing. You're stupid. Elon supports Germany's AfD party. I am offended. You should have more critical thinking like me."
And sadly that's a paraphrase not an exaggeration. I just saw that one on Ron F's page. :D
Mat retweeted
🔥 THIS IS ALL INTENTIONAL 🔥
Western Governments & Globalists WANT civil war across the West.
The plan:
Mass import hostile, angry 3rd world people (majority fighting age men) & weaponise the youth to hate themselves, their people & their country with radical Marxist ideology.
Soften laws to release dangerous violent criminals & predators straight back onto the streets.
These groups unite to destroy the country from within.
It’s obvious what they are doing.
Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see this.