Macro Confluence retweeted
Put it differently, the diversifying negative equity/bond correlation in 2000s/2010s was a departure from prior and current decades.
Positive SPX–10Yr Yield correlation has prevailed near 4%–5% . . . . . . but relationship has typically been negative at 10Yr Yields well above 5%
This is a trajectory plot of the rolling correlation between S&P 500 moves and 10-year Treasury yield moves, shown against the level of the 10-year yield itself, from June 1985 to 25 September 2026. The path traces how the stock–yield relationship has changed as the yield level has changed.
Positive correlation means stocks and yields have been moving in the same direction (a growth or “good news is good news” regime). Negative correlation means they have been moving opposite each other (rising yields acting as a valuation or tightening headwind, or falling yields supporting equities).
Two regimes stand out on the chart.
Around 4–5%, observations cluster in positive-correlation territory (roughly +0.4 to +0.9). That is the zone that has prevailed for much of the period since yields rose out of the post-GFC lows. Equities have often been able to advance even while the 10-year stayed elevated or moved higher.
Well above 5%—the large cloud stretching from about 5.5% to 11%—the correlation has typically been negative. That cloud is dominated by the 1980s–2000s, when a long decline in yields coincided with a long equity bull market. In that environment, falling yields and rising stocks produced negative co-movement.
The 25 September 2026 observation sits in the positive-correlation cluster, just left of the 5% line. That is consistent with the recent pattern FinTwit has been highlighting: near current yield levels the co-movement has still been positive.
The chart does not say yields above 5% automatically produce a rising S&P 500. It says the sign of the correlation has historically differed by yield zone. If the reading stays positive, modest further increases in the 10-year need not immediately cap equities.
A sustained flip into negative territory would mean rising yields had become a more direct headwind.
@chris_robb1 @fundstrat @robin_j_brooks @DannyDayan5 @AlanLongbon @CestrianInc @jfozak @steve_donze
“BOND KING” Gundlach takes aim at $CRWV and $NVDA after one of the first Nvidia GPU ABS maturities were reached. CoreWeave was unable to pay back the ABS as costs and debt/liabilities soared to over $70 billion since IPO 18 months ago. They had to sell shares and use convertible notes.
CoreWeave bonds have failed and are above 13% as executives selloff $10 billion of shares in 2026 alone (30% of company) all while the company lost access to traditional financing leaving equity and bond holders “holding the $75 billion bag of losses”.
“Gundlach took it a step further and compared it to issuing asset-backed securities that were guaranteed by bananas. "Why not do a 30 year ABS deal backed by warehouses of bananas? It's OK, they'll be newly engineered bananas of unknown life," he added.”
Macro Confluence retweeted
"AI compute capacity is typically depreciated over a roughly six-year useful life, so every $100 of semiconductor revenue has been offset by just a $17 depreciation charge in the year of sale.
Combined with an estimated $150 billion in reported profits from paper gains on stakes in frontier labs, this accounting treatment has made reported tech earnings growth look stronger than the underlying cash economics."
Carlyle
Very good Carlyle paper on AI and the tech supercycle.
Notable chart is how much of tech sector earnings growth is investment-related, not cash earnings
carlyle.com/global-insights/…
Macro Confluence retweeted
Yesterday, @NickTimiraos asked Kevin Warsh what had changed over the past year to reverse his view of the economy.
Yes the Iran War has created a supply shock. But, the real change is the AI buildout. Never before has the Fed cut in the face of a capex boom until the past year.
Macro Confluence retweeted
There are so many charts like this, where, if you remove China from the global data, the change is no longer significant.
China is responsible for:
- half of the world's solar/wind energy capacity,
- all of the decline in global pollution,
- 3/4ths of extreme poverty reduction
Our World in Data@OurWorldInDataSep 16Spain
SpainConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
How fast is the world building up solar power?
The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) is an intergovernmental organization with 172 countries and the European Union. Its Renewable Energy Statistics is a reference dataset on how much renewable power capacity has been installed around the world.
IRENA gathers the figures each year from national statistical offices, energy ministries, and industry associations, and fills gaps from official reports. The data covers almost every country from 2000 to 2025, broken down by technology: solar, wind, hydropower, bioenergy, geothermal, and others.
The chart shows the total solar capacity installed in each country, in gigawatts. Note that the figures are cumulative: they count every panel still in operation, not only those added in a given year.
The world added more than 500 gigawatts of solar in 2025 alone — more than twice all the solar capacity that existed anywhere in 2015. China alone accounts for half of the world’s cumulative total, with 1,200 gigawatts.
Our principal data scientist Pablo Rosado recently updated our charts with IRENA’s July 2026 release, which adds data for 2025. In the same pass, he updated two other IRENA datasets we rely on: the cost of electricity from renewable plants, and patents in renewable energy technologies.
Macro Confluence retweeted
Replying to @SamanthaLaDuc
They're loading up another aircraft carrier right now in San Diego.
Families were told 8 months minimum deployment.
military.com/new-navy-carrie…
Macro Confluence retweeted
Straits Taylor Rule:
i = r* + π* + 1.5(π−π*) + 0.5(y−y*) + α(SOH−SOH*) + β(BEM−BEM*), α,β > 0
Let’s see if a hike could open SOH or produce a single barrel :)
You can’t 25bp a chokepoint and r* isn’t neutral. It’s SOH risk premium, and We set it.
Stay unanchored !
Macro Confluence retweeted
BREAKING: A single Israeli Effective Altruism firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta cyberattacks
🧵 with help from @lumpenspace
Macro Confluence retweeted
I know this is anti-American, un-Christian, and hateful, but I look forward to this ridiculous A.I. bubble blowing up like a pair-instability supernova.
'Many are trying to forget five centuries of Western domination and the era of colonialism' — Lavrov
‘Now, they’re trying to tell us that we conquered half of Europe after WWII. We liberated it’
Macro Confluence retweeted
US term premium 'management' did not start last week, but a year ago, with Fed QT taper and exit, as well as Treasury's expanded buybacks at 3Q25 QRA.
Macro Confluence retweeted
Bessent spends way more time doing Firesign Policy driven interventionist showmanship than he does trying to deal with the fucking elephant in the room that is his hole turf balance sheet, starting to look like an unstoppable train wreck in the making.
Macro Confluence retweeted
At that point, I said that risk/reward was to cover and wait, because while it might go a little further, the risk was not worth it, as it certainly would not get through strong support at 117 and Warsh might bury the bear steepener at Jackson.
I was wrong: it wasn't Warsh, it was Bessent. What he announced yesterday, "at least 4bn" buybacks, in a normal situation would flatten the curve by no more than 2-4bp (frontrunning, off-the-run tightening). The reason the curve reacted so much more is because people were very heavy into the steepener and real rates had crossed 3%, which is attractive. Markets punished that greed. Basically Bessent's timing was good. Congrats to him.
Did anything change yesterday? Was it YCC, was it QE? None of those, but the odds shifted.
Macro Confluence retweeted
NVDA $500B fund (not to be confused with funding) consortium plan will not likely age well. Assets of unknown life as collateral for long term debt? Why not do a 30 year ABS deal backed by warehouses of bananas? It’s OK, they’ll be newly engineered bananas of unknown life.






























