Plan C retweeted
Put two and two together, anon.
$LINK
Today we’re announcing a strategic partnership with @chainlink
Chainlink CCIP and ACE are now natively embedded across OpenZeppelin tooling, giving institutions and developers one trusted foundation for moving assets and operations onchain.
Plan C retweeted
Every time I read an excellent detailed post on @chainlink I realize the level of knowledge required to understand the opportunity with ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca which is most likely why the token is not already higher. When you start to get institutional coverage of the protocol it will become clearer.
Someone can spend years following cryptocurrency markets or financial markets and still lack the background necessary to appreciate the opportunity.
I only see it because I started following the link story around a year after they came on the scene and several individuals likes fishy, null, drake that have laid out breadcrumbs over and over again and parsed stuff I didn’t understand with AI (once that was available) but it’s taken a lot of time looking into the various fud arguments to build the conviction needed to hold until the market matures.
Replying to @0xcyp
"Interop between permissioned Besu ledgers" isn't even 5% of a solution for what DTCC needs, which is why Chainlink is being used.
What about interop to Solana? Tempo? Hyperliquid? Zero? Canton? Stellar? Arc?
Canton, Stellar, and Arc are the actual *already* announced chains that DTCC’s tokenization service is expanding to (with many more to come).
Besu has absolutely no way of enabling interop to where DTCC already confirmed they are launching.
But on top of that, what about composability with non-financial networks like Fedwire, Fednow, Swift, DTCC, CLS, FIX, credit card networks, etc, which clear and settle transactions offchain?
You need a protocol that can do "orchestration" to allow for bidirectional movement of data, value, and state sync with these off-chain systems.
What about all the data needs?
What about compliance?
What about privacy?
The goal of tokenization is to have synchronized data and value across many different chains *and* systems to enable regulated 24/7 markets with atomic DvP & PvP with T+ 0 settlement.
"Interop between permissioned Besu chains" and/or intracluster connectivity within Ethereum L1 isn't even a 5% solution.
Chainlink is the only protocol that *already* does:
Data (Risk parameters, continuous price updates, NAV, Proof of Reserves, etc.)
- Interoperability between all blockchains, public and private
- Compliance (KYC/AML/Sanctions list, etc.)
- Privacy (Confidential computations required to protect sensitive information)
- Connectivity to existing financial systems (Swift, etc.)
- Connectivity to AI Agents
- and more
Now you see how trivial a single blockchain is compared to the true problem.
But it doesn't just end there. We've all these extra things to add into the transaction. Are we gonna use multiple separate solutions for each, each with their own architectures, security models, etc.?
No, what we need is a fully verifiable, decentralized runtime environment to orchestrate everything a transaction needs.
Enter the Chainlink Runtime Environment.
Every single operation in a transaction (from the list of requirements above) is fully verifitable, tamper-proof, traceable, and auditable.
The Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) is what orchestrates the full lifecycle of these transactions.
Just look at the quotes from DTCC CTO and the slide from the workflow they just demoed at SWIFT's SIBOS conference.
No blockchain even comes close to fulfilling this.
Plan C retweeted
Clearer screenshots of Chainlink orchestration fees in this workflow attached (4 separate fees, paid in $LINK)
+ CCIP fee in comments
Plan C retweeted
Game changer
"Any asset, […] any jurisdiction, with any custodial system, any time of day is now mobile in terms of collateral. This truly changes the game.”
- Dan Doney, CTO of @The_DTCC
Plan C retweeted
You ain’t ready for whats coming… $LINK
Plan C retweeted
🚨🚨🚨 Chainlink CRE fees may be much higher than we initially estimated 🚨🚨🚨
👀 We were assuming that there's only 1 orchestration fee in this DTCC transaction, but it looks like there's actually 4 separate orchestration fees, plus a CCIP fee too 👀
𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝟓 𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 🔥🔥🔥
The CRE orchestration fee isn't charged once per transaction. It's charged on every workflow step a user signs (see attached images - blurry because they're screenshots from the live demo).
In the DTCC demo at Sibos, every wallet signature shows "Orchestration fee 0.01 LINK":
13:30 Create financing contract
14:48 Deposit $10m tUSD
17:22 Request $5m loan against MSFT
29:44 Repay loan
That's 4 separate Orchestration fees, paid in LINK.
On top of that there's a separate CCIP fee (20:15) for bridging the collateral to the DTCC AppChain.
Repo + securities lending is $20T+ a day.
Even a tiny share, with multiple LINK fees per transaction, adds up fast.
The scaling is clear: more steps in a workflow means more fees.
$LINK
DTCC AND CHAINLINK AT SIBOS 2026
DTCC's Dan Doney and @SergeyNazarov presented how @The_DTCC is collaborating with Chainlink to advance 24/7 collateral management.
DTCC's Collateral AppChain provides shared infrastructure near real-time collateral management across financial markets and blockchains.
“The problem being solved is the fragmentation of data, how everybody connects to move collateral and settle transactions, and the different systems that need to talk to each other but cannot do so quickly enough to allow intraday collateral movement.” - Sergey Nazarov
DTCC’s Collateral AppChain will leverage the Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) for orchestration between those systems and data sources, and CCIP which enables the movement of assets, value, and liquidity to and from the AppChain.
"You finally have a reliable and legally binding ledger from the DTCC that everyone can rely on, just like they rely on the DTCC now. That's a very powerful thing that I think the capital markets have been waiting for, where they can't get that from just any chain because those guarantees with the DTCC are fundamentally different" Nazarov also added.
The DTCC Collateral AppChain is expected to launch in Q1 2027.
Presentation slides here: chn.lk/dtcc-chainlink-sibos-…
Watch the full presentation ↓
Plan C retweeted
🚨 DTCC JUST PUT A NUMBER ON IT 🚨
On stage at Sibos, DTCC's Dan Doney said this collateral model can automate transactions "in excess of 20 trillion a day."
The rails: Chainlink CRE + CCIP
DTCC Collateral AppChain launch: Q1 2027
Announced. Not live yet.
Only 1B $LINK will ever exist.
Enterprise revenue gets converted into $LINK for the #Chainlink Reserve.
If a sliver of $20T a day touches Chainlink
$100 is the warm-up.
$1,000 is the conversation. 🔥
Plan C retweeted
Yesterday Chainlink announced 40 integrations in the month of September.
Today Chainlink announced 24 previously unknown in production integrations of Chainlink Vaults Adapters.
you worry. not me.
$LINK
Replying to @chainlink
CCIP Vault Adapters are already being adopted across the vault ecosystem:
Protocols & Issuers:
@aave
@Lombard_Finance
@UTechStables
@maplefinance
@worldlibertyfi
@VenusProtocol
@re
@tenbinlabs
@humafinance
@trystable
@saturn_credit
@tori_finance
@TreehouseFi
Vault Curators & Platforms:
@veda_labs
@RockawayX
@AccountableData
@k3_capital
@turtledotxyz
@EmberProtocol
Fusion by @ipor_io
@enzymefinance
@mezzanine_fi
@R25Official
Plan C retweeted
They turned a $10B retail fraud scheme from a group of degens in an amphetamines-addicted sex cult living in a $100M Bahamas compound into ... a normie love story
This movie was never going to be good, but man what a missed opportunity
Wait, this is bigger than most think. Chainlink just launched CCIP Vault Adapters which is a huge game changer.
TLDR: Don’t bring the application to every chain. Bring every chain to the application.
A vault can now remain on one home chain while accepting deposits from users across 80+ CCIP-supported blockchains. Standard ERC-4626 vaults can integrate through a factory contract without writing custom cross-chain code.
What most will miss is that the vault receipt token itself can become a CCT, $LINK (Cross-Chain Token) standard.
So basically, the capital can come from anywhere.
The investment strategy can live somewhere else.
And the financial claim representing ownership of that strategy can potentially circulate somewhere else again.
LINK EVERYTHING.
Plan C retweeted
CHAINLINK AT BLACKROCK'S ALADDIN CLIENT FORUM
Blockchains & stablecoins let AI agents move value onchain.
But agentic transactions need trusted data, guardrails, & verifiable execution.
@SergeyNazarov joined @BlackRock's Will Su & @Coinbase's Alec Lovett on what comes next.
Plan C retweeted
Dear $LINK stakers,
are we ready to share the alpha and discuss the utility of staking ethereum:0xa95c5ebb86e0de73b4fb8c47a45b792cfea28c23?
Plan C retweeted
The “$LINK token isn’t needed” argument is getting harder to defend.
Node operators stake $LINK to secure the network. Enterprises can pay in fiat or stablecoins, while Chainlink’s payment system converts fees into $LINK.
Now add DTCC, Swift, JPMorgan, UBS and Euroclear adoption.
Institutions don’t need to buy $LINK directly. Chainlink usage still creates demand for it.













































