Dear Shri Zubair, we have taken note of your point that many instances of duplicate entries can still be found in the electoral roll of UP even after SIR. We are well aware of that fact and are in midst of the work of removing the duplicate entries. A major political party has already submitted to us a list of such entries some days ago. They have claimed that the number of duplicate entries is in lakhs but we are sure that it would not be so since we have already covered much ground since end of SIR. We have also noted your other point of instances of individuals filing multiple forms-7 for deletion of other voters. This was also in our knowledge as the issue was prominently raised by parties during SIR in first half of February this year. We had done two press conferences only on this issue in the month of February itself. A news portal also brought it out again on 9th October before you posted about it. We had already clarified this issue before your post through a press release issued some days ago. You can check it out on our X handle. 1/2

Hello, Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup. Stop acting like a troll by threatening citizens who point out flaws in SIR. The SIR exercise in Uttar Pradesh was completed and the final electoral rolls were published in April 2026. Yet duplicate entries remain unresolved. Wasn’t eliminating duplicate entries one of the central objectives of this entire exercise? Also, do you understand sarcasm? “Buy one, get one free” was precisely that. In your own tweet, you acknowledge issuing four voter ID cards with different EPIC numbers to one person. How did four applications in the same person’s name pass scrutiny and result in four separate voter IDs? Submitting four Form6 applications is wrong. Accepting and processing those duplicate requests exposes an even bigger failure in verification. What is the point of SIR if your system cannot detect repeated applications from the same person? If someone applies for fresh enrolment ten times, will @ECISVEEP issue ten different voter IDs? Further, according to the Form 9 records uploaded on your own UP CEO website, Mr. Sundar submitted Form 6 on January 6 and again on January 14. We have the data for that booth. These are your own official records. This data was uploaded on your own UP CEO website. Also Please upload all Form9s on your website. Many are still missing. Instead of threatening us, Please put more efforts on fixing the failures instead of threatening citizens who expose them. There are many such cases, Let me share a few more examples here. Follow below thread. 🧵🔥

Mr Fact-checker please fact-check your own facts. There is no such scheme as “Buy one Get one free” scheme by Election Commission. As per your post, the voter had submitted only two applications and he got 4 EPIC cards. This statement is false. The voter had submitted 4 applications. If you want to dispute our facts then you post the reference numbers of two applications that you claim he had submitted and we will post the reference number of the remaining two. The problem of generation of multiple EPICs on submission of multiple forms of an individual is a long standing one. We do deduplication through ECINET periodically. We are on path to achieving the objective of catching multiple forms submitted by an individual at the submission stage only. We will achieve our objective very soon. Please do not incite people by making patently false statements about ECI and thereby trying to create disaffection among the citizens towards a Constitutional Body. You are advised to rectify your mistake by amending or deleting your post after completing your own due diligence now that you have been informed by us about your wrong information.