'compelling … thorough and well-argued' - G. Greenwald 1/10/06 https://xitter.cf/t.co/YnoR3lfDGr 'always very much appreciated' - O. Kerr 8/31/10 https://xitter.cf/t.co/kkjtvDDoty
Joined March 2009
- Tweets38.1K
- Following0
- Followers884
- Likes234K
Pinned Tweet
It’s also why they’re able to show us zero examples of anyone hit by a car and has an arm that looks like John’s arm.
jukeboxgrad retweeted
It’s also why they’re able to show us zero examples of anyone hit by a car and has an arm that looks like John’s arm.
jukeboxgrad retweeted
“By 5:46 the piece of taillight is found”
You don’t know that, because there’s no documentation recording that time, and you cannot name the witness who supposedly found anything at that time.
2/11/20: Farwell and Birchmore discussed him raping her when she was 15. They also discussed this months later.
8/18/21: Fanning said he had “access to approximately 12 months of iMessages.”
Why didn’t Fanning arrest him? Luckily for Farwell he wasn’t a journalist annoying Jen.
Fanning, 8/16/21: "Sandra's laptop gave me access to approximately 12 months of iMessages."
Guarino, 10/15/26: "He [Fanning] was manually going through all the messages. Sandra backed up every message … it was a complete backup."
They pretended the older messages didn't exist.
🤖 Made with AI
jukeboxgrad retweeted
“O'Keefe's phone recorded its final movement seconds after Karen Read's Lexus reversed”
The actual number of “seconds” is more than ninety, which is sufficient to prove there was no collision.
Very important for @TeamFUKR et al to pretend to not know what we learned in a recent FOIA release: according to Whiffin, the phone was handled at 12:33:14. This proves there was no collision. xitter.cf/jukeboxgrad/status/206…
jukeboxgrad retweeted
So you think it’s possible to break plexiglass with your arm without breaking your arm. But you’ve never done it. Why not? Imagine how famous you’ll be when you do something no human has done.
Those karate demonstrations never use plexiglass. Do you know why?
Whiffin said JO's phone moved at 12:33:14. This proves there was no collision. That's why the McAlberts say the phone stopped moving at 12:32. Take @Randall145695, who says that incessantly. And of course blocks you if you show proof the claim is false.
This is how they operate.
jukeboxgrad retweeted
A long time ago, Ian Whiffin himself said phone location data can be "wildly inaccurate." So it was always foolish to rely on JO's phone data as supposed proof he wasn't in the house. This just underlines that.
doubleblak.com/blogPost.php?…
xitter.cf/OliviaLambo_/status/21…
This is INSANE. So much to unpack. How the heck did we not see this at trial??? This completely debunks the Commonwealth’s narrative that John O’Keefe’s iPhone GPS location data possessed the accuracy and precision to discernibly place him outside the house. If that’s the case, then why does Jen McCabe’s phone location data show her even FARTHER outside of the house during time periods she was allegedly inside??
A long time ago, Ian Whiffin himself said phone location data can be "wildly inaccurate." So it was always foolish to rely on JO's phone data as supposed proof he wasn't in the house. This just underlines that.
doubleblak.com/blogPost.php?…
xitter.cf/OliviaLambo_/status/21…
This is INSANE. So much to unpack. How the heck did we not see this at trial??? This completely debunks the Commonwealth’s narrative that John O’Keefe’s iPhone GPS location data possessed the accuracy and precision to discernibly place him outside the house. If that’s the case, then why does Jen McCabe’s phone location data show her even FARTHER outside of the house during time periods she was allegedly inside??
jukeboxgrad retweeted
“Having a collection is highly suspicious”
But Brian Albert getting rid of his phone the day before a judge ordered him to not get rid of his phone is not? Thanks for clearing that up.
Such a classic McAlbert move for @Randall145695 to ask a question, pretending he’s actually interested in an answer, while also blocking me to prevent me from answering.
They repeat this argument incessantly, even though it has multiple problems. Here’s one: he could have dropped his phone and gone inside the house without it.
An exceptionally drunk person walking in the dark on slippery, uneven, unfamiliar ground could easily drop his phone and not notice he did so. Or have a hard time finding it even if he did notice.
@sheetnwinch
Love it when people respond to me while also blocking me so I can’t respond to them.
It’s not necessary to believe he died inside or even went inside. The whole thing could’ve happened outside. And what you said about hypothermia is still wrong.
Perfect illustration of a mistake that’s commonly made. A cold dead body doesn’t tell us the person experienced hypothermia. Hypothermia is something that happens to living people, not dead people.
MamaLama43 repeats a lie heard often in McAlbert folklore: “ONLY WBZ reported that and they quickly corrected the error.”
The article from 2/2/22 wasn't corrected until 5/21/24. That's more than a month after trial one started. Waiting more than two years is not "quickly."
And thank you to @BostonTom23 for pointing out yet another example of an article that was never corrected. It has been on the internet for years, potentially tainting jurors, and is still doing so as of today.
wgbh.org/news/local/2022-02-…
"not only is there apparently some video footage from one of those Ring doorbells on a nearby house that can capture images in front of your home —"
And we should not expect @MamaLama43 to quickly correct her lie about WBZ quickly correcting their lie. They waited two years. She’ll probably wait forever.