Founder, Lead Eng, Cat dad 4x spark enthusiast

Joined June 2022
The new meta for 4x spark setups Glm 5.2 as your orchestrator DSV4F as your worker Hard to beat this combo right now
42
19
9
512
42,208
They are going for the agents are dangerous lets ban them play i see
BREAKING: JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, & other major banks have reportedly detected unauthorized AI agents operating inside customer accounts.
2
48
Jon retweeted
Huge respect to the DGX Spark community. We had the intuition early on to see the potential in this little machine and instead of waiting for someone else to unlock it, we worked together to push it further, optimize it, experiment, share what worked, and bring out the best in it. Now the world is starting to notice just how capable DGX Spark really is. But as James McPherson said, maybe the bigger story isn’t just how great the hardware is, it’s how great this community has become around it. Let’s not lose sight of that. Keep building. Keep sharing. Keep pushing the limits. The hardware was the spark. The community is the accelerator. @mr_r0b0t @Blackwellboy @NeoAIForecast @Tech2Wild @MichaelGannotti @aijoey @BosonJoe @with_gene2626
@volatilemarkts @ivanfioravanti @thatcofffeeguy @WescheNex1q @SpaceTimeViking @yume_arasaki @GordianKnotDev @LytninCrypto @light_foundry @MichaelHutu @StefanMaier @anemll @Q_Beaux @SixZzshOtRipZz @GumbiiDigital @GBminA @ayayalar @chrittazz @jonathan_conn @Dave_Charland @MarkSunner @haydonryan @Defenestrator22 @kkiran @NsitnovSitnov @DJLougen @imost @wikiwayne @ViC305 @ashxhart @jvr0x @majewskizby @plotarmordev @justinn_builds , @MiaAI_lab @0xBakeer @JamesMeadlock @tysn_dev @mmastrac @CK2084 @jnardiello @dangerm00se
I have little doubt that the price increase is strictly due to RAM prices. The X communities MASSIVE optimizations have opened the door for the Spark to be considered for real inference work for small teams and companies.
13
13
6
146
12,691
Claude code streaming file changes from other parallel sessions is just criminal
47
Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo
67
361
28
10,865
746,096
startups don't even try to explain their moat anymore, they just look at you like this
15
11
2
469
13,747
Jon retweeted
Bullish
1
1
11
348
codex for admin work 🤝 fable for eng work
1
61
IM NEVER GONNA DIE
29
4
242
14,441
codex is awesome, but its usage limits are ABSOLUTELY crippling
2
5
116
Stole @usr_bin_roygbiv meme from yesterday 😒 bro stealing isnt a personality trait you can be original
6
2
1
61
1,937
Excited to test out Jev, thanks @typesafeai
3
107
Power worker combo ive been using
1
2
108
been an entire year since i thought about map reduce
28
56
2
1,571
46,379
I was just building a preview proxy....
1
2
89
Replying to @PeterBowdenLive
it’s a difficult problem. how to manage something infinitely smarter than you.
5
2
1
52
16,300
Local AI should be cheaper and more accessible. It has the potential to improve the quality of life so it can't be a tool just for a few
5
1
14
1,538
If your tui does not have this many themes i dont want it
2
142
Boring... can't wait to see all this fearmongering from Anthropic to evaporate as soon as they IPO'd and all their employees have cashed-in on their vested stock
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
4
1
1
29
1,875
Excited to start messing with hardware again Board arrived beautiful Thanks! @realwillreil
1
1
4
2,743