Promotor de lugares y mis ideas, la libertad y BITCOIN!!! a1 50 69 65 6e 73 61 20 70 6f 72 20 74 69 20 6d 69 73 6d 6f 21
Bitcoin
Joined September 2021
- Tweets3K
- Following79
- Followers184
- Likes5.2K
What holds BSV back the most is the lack of a technical, public, and honest debate—one aligned with real incentives. It’s time to accelerate this!
PUBLIC CHALLENGE: THIS OCTOBER 31ST, LET’S BRING ALL BSV PROJECTS TO TWITTER/X TO BE ANALYZED—OPENLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE. EVERYONE’S OPINION COUNTS! MY WORK, YOUR WORK—RIGHT HERE. DO YOU DARE?
I’ve spent nearly a decade working in Bitcoin; I’ve built wallets for A-to-B transactions, I’ve created applications that no one in the BSV space even understands yet, and I’ve developed an evolution of digital tokens—and I never once needed a fucking standard! NEVER!
I've just built three advanced, decentralized, distributed example infrastructure applications that use BRC-100 under the hood, as well as SPV, and are designed for a high-throughput Teranode world.
1bsv.net/patterns.html
github.com/lightwebinc/bstac…
It's the only thing that scales.
Mentioning BSV’s most useless standard—BRC100—in the same sentence as Teranode or SPV should be considered a crime against Bitcoin; but then again, what do I know? I’m still waiting to see a single real-world use case for that unnecessary standard!
Mi placer culpable es escuchar a estos supuestos gurus.
La purga intelectual será enorme!
youtu.be/P8Arowkv6z8?si=PcjN…
Rechazó a todos estos guías de BSV, a estos supuestos técnicos, programadores, REFERENTES, no han creado nada útil....estándares? Pufff, critican, como si hubieran escrito el código de bitcoin, llevo viéndolos años, son INUTILES, brc100 es basura inútil!!
I reject that this must be the fate of all such projects, because there is utility associated with the technology itself, independent of loyalty to any one person.
I reject that the project is incapable of moving forward, because many people continue to build new things and join discussions not centered on CSW: MetanetMeetup.com
I reject that Calvin is purely a cultist, because in addition to the past litigation, he ALSO funded the development of useful technologies like Teranode and overlays. However I accept that cultist (dogmatic, loyalty-driven) principles have been influential in the past.
I accept that cultists cause harm and should be removed, but I do not accept that their removal will spell the end for BSV (technology). Because WE are replacing their FAILED cult with a new cultURE of Meritocracy. This reform takes time, but it is happening more and more every day.
This is not a choice for you, my readers. This is my Declaration, that I shall IMPOSE these changes, through my work, and the relationships and actions We are pursuing. I promise to do all in my power to this end, in due course. This is me being transparent with you, you are free to cut ties or yell at me or boycott my services if you wish, within the powers You have under Law.
The Church of Satoshi, and the Cult of Craig (that HE SAYS he never even wanted), will die. I will destroy it.
However, Long Live the New BSV Meritocracy!!!!!
Together, we can build for a better future:
Hard money.
Micropayments
User owned identity
Portable data
Vendor neutral
Open standards (NO patent trolling for Apps atop the base layer!!)
So yes, I am excited for 2027.
Receipts:
Brc100.org
BSV.place
Metanet.FYI
BSV.news
EX-MACHINA y su relación con BITCOIN / ANÁLISIS GATUNO EP 10 🤓🤓😱😱😼😼💀💀
TO WATCH THE FULL EPISODE OF THE CAVE EXCLUSIVELY FOR LESS THAN 5 CENTS,
GO TO JATAKA.CL AND GET YOUR LIVON
youtube.com/watch?v=BXYQZSRW…
🤖 Made with AI
Jataka⏹️🔼⏺️🐉🇨🇱🐇 retweeted
Esta maravillosa foto publicada hoy por la NASA, muestra una escalera de piedra que está en nuestro Desierto de Atacama y que parece conectarnos a la Vía Láctea. Otra maravilla de Chile.
Las comunidades se mueven por ideologías!!.
BITCOIN se mueve por INCENTIVOS, por eso no hay comunidad BSV, por eso no es necesario una comunidad para BITCOIN, por eso toda la NARRATIVA de "comunidad" es una ESTUPIDEZ.
