Pinned Tweet
We’re not heading toward a crisis.
We’re already past the point of no return.
What’s coming isn’t a crash — it’s a sorting event.
For 20 years, we optimized for convenience.
For 10 years, we optimized for engagement.
Now we’re optimizing for control.
AI didn’t break the system.
It completed it.
One stack. One feed. One identity layer.
One permission slip for existence.
This is the end-state of the Tenant economy:
• You don’t own your audience
• You don’t own your data
• You don’t own your identity
• You don’t even own your attention
You rent reality.
And here’s the part most people miss:
This doesn’t end with revolution.
It ends with compliance.
Most people won’t fight the cage.
They’ll upgrade it.
Frictionless. Managed. Safe.
A perfectly optimized life — curated by machines that know you better than you know yourself.
That path already has a name.
It’s comfortable.
It’s popular.
And it’s irreversible.
But there’s another trajectory — quieter, harder, smaller.
It doesn’t ask for permission.
It doesn’t wait for consensus.
It doesn’t try to “fix” the system.
It routes around it.
That path starts with one principle:
If you don’t hold the keys, you don’t own anything.
Not your money.
Not your words.
Not your history.
Not yourself.
The future splits here.
On one side:
Centralized AI, managed identities, narrative enforcement, infinite noise.
On the other:
Self-custody. Cryptographic identity. Direct value exchange. Small, high-trust networks.
Not mass adoption.
Selection.
This is what Metanet is built for.
Not another platform.
Not another audience trap.
Not another “Web3” casino.
Metanet is infrastructure for people who already know the game is over — and want out before the snap.
• Identity without permission
• Value without middlemen
• Truth anchored in proof, not feeds
• Networks that scale sideways, not upward
When the brittle systems break — and they will — the survivors won’t be the loudest.
They’ll be the ones who already left.
This isn’t about “winning the internet.”
It’s about remaining human when the internet stops being real.
No saviors are coming.
No reforms are coming.
No rollback is coming.
There is only one move left:
Build parallel.
Build sovereign.
Build now.
Metanet isn’t the future.
It’s the exit.
And the door doesn’t stay open forever.
GetMetanet.com
MetanetAcademy.com
MetanetApps.com
Join.BSV.Chat
MetanetMeetup.com
iykyk
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
I'm going to use Joel's post here as an opportunity to explain why we're doing what we're doing at BSVA and the BRC process (which was started in large part thanks to @ProjectBabbage)
Backwards compatibility is a virtue, until what you’re staying compatible with is the bottleneck.
Joel’s point is fair in general. New software usually should respect what came before. But the way Bitcoin wallets have always worked is not how Bitcoin was designed to work. It’s a workaround that stopped working the moment BSV got busy.
We’ve already tested it at scale. BSV has mined blocks of nearly 4GB. When application traffic peaked, the network kept producing blocks. What fell over was everything around it: indexers, exchanges, explorers, ElectrumX servers, and services that tried to keep up by scanning the whole chain for every address they cared about. Mining scaled. The application layer didn’t.
That’s the core problem with the ElectrumX model. A wallet asks a server, “What happened to my addresses?” To answer, that server has to index everyone’s history. Its cost grows with the whole network, not with its users. At 4GB blocks, that design isn’t old-fashioned. It’s broken.
Satoshi’s design was different. Payments go directly between the people involved. The original client even let you pay straight to an IP address. The whitepaper describes Simplified Payment Verification (SPV): you keep block headers and check a Merkle proof for the transactions that matter to you. Nobody has to watch the entire chain on your behalf.
That’s what the BRC-100 stack is built on. Transactions travel peer-to-peer with their own proofs attached (BEEF), and wallets verify them against headers. Your wallet’s workload grows with your own activity, not the world’s.
Does that make us right about everything? No. People raised real criticisms of MessageBox, and that’s directly why work is now underway (Thank you @deggen !) on WebRTC-based peer-to-peer connections. Keep the criticism coming. Better still, contribute. We want this to be the most scalable, usable stack ever built, and that takes people breaking it.
But “it’s not compatible with how we’ve always done things” isn’t a reason to stop. How we’ve always done things is what failed under real load. The miners are ready for terabyte blocks. Wallets and apps have to be designed to keep up now, not after the next wave of traffic takes them down again.
I think Joel, Cryptorebel, and others are raising good points that require us all to communicate in good faith. I hope to be a part of facilitating that conversation moving forward!
Replying to @___siggi___ @cryptorebel_SV
That seems backwards .. new things/software should be compatible with older things, not making themselves incompatible so that the older things have to change and support both.
This is pretty cool stuff and on BSV, even better. 😎 I recall someone sending Bitcoins over ham radio circa 2013, so this isn't completely new. 😁
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
What holds BSV back the most is the lack of a technical, public, and honest debate—one aligned with real incentives. It’s time to accelerate this!
some of the apps on metanetapps.com are not where they should be, and we want you to feel excited sharing them with your friends
which one should we fix first?
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
LIVE: TERAGUN now reads miner-enforced names and pfps.
The name and picture you own on @zanaadu are on the leaderboard the moment you connect:
- no signup
- nothing to re-upload
- win the lottery and the prize lands in your wallet by itself.
Identity you OWN, apps that read it.
Did you know that for every BRC number you can add .dev on the end and then find it easily?
BRC-100 -> brc.dev/100
BRC-67 -> brc.dev/67
BRC-187 -> brc.dev/187
etc.
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
Replying to @cryptorebel_SV @ProjectBabbage
There is nothing destructive whatsoever about catering to end users who simply 1) have no time to learn what you want them to learn and 2) do not care about the underlying mechanics of anything. It's ridiculous to suggest otherwise, and indicates you live entirely in a bubble.
The vast majority of people know absolutely nothing about how phones work, banks, money in general, and most of simply *do not want to know* about arcane IT lingo lol. Most are just trying to put food on their tables and *might* consider an opportunity if it's clear how they will benefit. Removing barriers to entry is the *best* thing the BitcoinSV dev community can do.
Props to Babbage for understanding this
Replying to @johncalhooon @ProjectBabbage
💪 No Sir!
I was going to give it a beat, iron out the wrinkles before announcing anything - but the first direct payment over WebRTPay occurred at around 9am this morning.
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
Replying to @FromArise @ProjectBabbage
tangible Businesses cant succeed or move forward unless we can complete the cycle of purchasing raw goods and selling with out on/off ramps.
Mainstream #BSV users will not need to understand BSV, and no critical thinking skills will be required.
You have to just put the fries in the bag, so they can enjoy their cheeseburger. 🍟✌️
Replying to @FromArise
But critical thinking about efficient beef production is not required for the enjoyment of a cheeseburger.
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
Replying to @ProjectBabbage
Meaningful experience is the best vehicle for any changing mind.
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
Replying to @ProjectBabbage
1) ease of access
2) easy practical use
3) fun apps
4) all while use technical and security benefits of the chain
I agree this is an important conversation.
A public ledger operates within human society, not in a lawless vacuum. When an external institutional directive—such as a binding judicial freeze or asset recovery order—affects the spendability of specific outputs, responsible stewardship forbids two opposite dishonesties: it refuses to pretend that possession of a stolen cryptographic key places a thief above property law, and it equally refuses to hide legal interventions inside silent history rewrites or false claims of pure mathematical determinism.
Every external directive must be isolated in an explicit, cryptographically signed, publicly inspectable manifest and recorded transparently on-chain so that any independent verifier can distinguish what followed from the genesis rules and what followed from an institutional decision.
Great progress! Glad we're seeing better alternatives to Message Box for online payments.
github.com/bsv-blockchain/ts…
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
I never really stopped to reflect on how awesome @PiWalletSV's logo is🔥
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
mainstream #BSV uptake, if it happens, will stem from tangible personal benefits experienced during use rather than abstract ideological arguments.
people don’t need heavy convincing, instead we should think about practical utility like micropayments and Metanet apps they enjoy
76%Y
24%N
42 votes • 1 hoursReplying to @ProjectBabbage @PacArtCollect
Personal responsibility is paramount, in life, and in Bitcoin.
Whenever an influential figure says the reasons for your struggles are rooted within the failings of others…they’re selling you snake oil.
Even if sometimes it’s partly true, this mindset is very counterproductive. Better to focus on what YOU can control, and do better! #BSV
Replying to @PacArtCollect
I do not accept that blaming people is a solution.
I subscribe to the principle, as Jordan Peterson put it, of BSV “putting our own house in order”
Your prevailing sentiment is that other people’s faults are the main blocker to BSV’s adoption.
That sentiment is both counterproductive and unhealthy.
















