0x406f1b7dd3
Joined January 2014
From concept to reality. @SpaceX has successfully deployed Starlink V3 satellites into Earth’s orbit and made contact with them for the first time. At scale, one Starship carries 60 V3 satellites, the same network capacity as about 20 Falcon 9 launches.
799
3,933
947
29,768
4,898,582
iquidus retweeted
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
377
2,072
656
15,868
3,695,723
holy shit i asked claude to make a video on western civiization
2,745
10,570
2,907
61,460
15,172,622
JUST IN: OpenAI and Anthropic reportedly exaggerated AI security threats to push the government to protect their market position
565
1,273
646
13,015
2,162,196
iquidus retweeted
AI isn’t going away. Barring unprecedented global government coordination, it isn’t even slowing down. The only real decision is whether to centralize power, or disperse it. Do you fear the technology? Or a small number of people controlling the technology?
952
1,311
291
12,325
1,065,088
iquidus retweeted
AI doomerism is the new climate change. Same exact people.
I work at OpenAI. In my personal capacity, I also think we need to slow down.
219
176
39
2,035
88,374
"The most intelligent inhabitants of that future world won't be men or monkeys. They'll be machines—the remote descendants of today's computers. Now the present-day electronic brains are complete morons, but this will not be true in another generation. They will start to think, and eventually they will completely outthink their makers. Is this depressing? I don't see why it should be. We superseded the Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal men, and we presume we're an improvement. I think we should regard it as a privilege to be stepping stones to higher things. I suspect that organic, or biological, evolution has about come to its end, and we're now at the beginning of inorganic, or mechanical, evolution, which will be thousands of times swifter." — Arthur C. Clark 1964
89
82
18
682
73,303
who made this masterpiece ?
377
1,850
505
12,157
1,652,624
Who is John Galt?
582
581
106
9,113
428,304
Just joined @eigenlabs as their Social Media Lead By week four I was in a war room We launched ecdsa.fail, an open challenge where autoresearchers beat Google’s secret quantum circuit. In public with just 72 hours! Justin Drake, one of the top Ethereum researchers, posted about it and hit nearly 3M organic impressions AND NOW, the community is still pushing the benchmark further I’ve never seen a launch move this fast. Millions of eyes in days & the energy was truly unreal What excites me most is the mission -- Eigen Labs is not building another closed lab. INSTEAD, we're building open agentic networks so any researcher, not just the big labs, can push the frontier of science We just did it with Bitcoin. YET Biology, neuroscience, and genomics are next Let's do it, together. 💪🏽🫶🏽
19
7
1
102
11,561
Celo is back in the Validiums & Optimiums tab! 🔄 With the Jello hardfork, @Celo introduced a new network upgrade that brought OP @SuccinctLabs Lite with ZK proofs to Celo mainnet, together with the @eigen_da V2 bridge DACert verifier. Let’s break down what actually changed ⬇️
8
20
2
86
14,094
iquidus retweeted
MegaETH
@megaeth18 Dec 2025
The Frontier is Open MegaETH mainnet has been live for weeks to infra teams like @LayerZero_Core, @eigen_da, @chainlink, @redstone_defi, @Alchemy and @safe. Today is day 1 for builders. Apps will deploy and test while users track progress through explorers and dashboards.
317
182
127
1,296
241,833
Big milestones like this don’t happen without serious execution behind the scenes. Congrats to @eigen_da who just demonstrated 1 GB/s sustained throughput across 100 operators and 10 countries. At Altius, we executed and validated high-throughput benchmarking as part of this effort - including sustained 30+ MB/s execution runs under real-world conditions. This is what modern blockchain infrastructure looks like: measured, stress-tested, and built to scale. Executed by @AltiusLabs
EigenCloud
@eigencloud16 Dec 2025
Today @eigen_da reaches cloud scale at 1GB/s. Benchmarked across 100 operators and 10 countries. ft. @sreeramkannan and @0xkydo
43
27
20
198
104,729
iquidus retweeted
EigenCloud
@eigencloud16 Dec 2025
Today @eigen_da reaches cloud scale at 1GB/s. Benchmarked across 100 operators and 10 countries. ft. @sreeramkannan and @0xkydo
71
71
35
395
223,284
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees. $30 per seat per month. $1.4 million annually. I called it "digital transformation." The board loved that phrase. They approved it in eleven minutes. No one asked what it would actually do. Including me. I told everyone it would "10x productivity." That's not a real number. But it sounds like one. HR asked how we'd measure the 10x. I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards." They stopped asking. Three months later I checked the usage reports. 47 people had opened it. 12 had used it more than once. One of them was me. I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds. It took 45 seconds. Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations. But I called it a "pilot success." Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail. The CFO asked about ROI. I showed him a graph. The graph went up and to the right. It measured "AI enablement." I made that metric up. He nodded approvingly. We're "AI-enabled" now. I don't know what that means. But it's in our investor deck. A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT. I said we needed "enterprise-grade security." He asked what that meant. I said "compliance." He asked which compliance. I said "all of them." He looked skeptical. I scheduled him for a "career development conversation." He stopped asking questions. Microsoft sent a case study team. They wanted to feature us as a success story. I told them we "saved 40,000 hours." I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up. They didn't verify it. They never do. Now we're on Microsoft's website. "Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot." The CEO shared it on LinkedIn. He got 3,000 likes. He's never used Copilot. None of the executives have. We have an exemption. "Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction." I wrote that policy. The licenses renew next month. I'm requesting an expansion. 5,000 more seats. We haven't used the first 4,000. But this time we'll "drive adoption." Adoption means mandatory training. Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches. But completion will be tracked. Completion is a metric. Metrics go in dashboards. Dashboards go in board presentations. Board presentations get me promoted. I'll be SVP by Q3. I still don't know what Copilot does. But I know what it's for. It's for showing we're "investing in AI." Investment means spending. Spending means commitment. Commitment means we're serious about the future. The future is whatever I say it is. As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
5,087
25,212
5,912
169,773
26,228,003
The Jello Hardfork 🪼🍮 is live on @Celo and it feels amazing to finally share this. As of today, Celo now supports zk fault proofs using OP Succinct Lite and EigenDA’s Hokulea We have been grinding on this upgrade for almost a year and short of the L1 → L2 transition, it has been one of the hardest engineering efforts we have ever shipped. A ton of work went into prover integration, batching, client changes, performance tuning, and testing every weird edge case we could find Huge shoutout to the @SuccinctLabs and @Eigen_DA teams. We spent months building together, fixing issues together, redesigning things together, and tackling problems that literally had no handbook. Could not have shipped Jello without them With Jello, anyone can now zk-prove Celo transactions. This massively improves the security of the native bridge and brings us in line with the kind of guarantees @L2BEAT expects at this time from a secure optimium style L2. Safer withdrawals, better validation, and fewer trust assumptions. This is a big deal And of course, zk-proving also paves the way for faster and more secure interop with the rest of Ethereum. Jello sets the stage for a stronger and more trust-minimized future for Celo Come build with us
The Jello Hardfork is complete: OP Succinct Lite is activated on Celo mainnet! 🎉 @cLabs & @SuccinctLabs have ushered in the next chapter of Celo's ZK revolution, enhancing security & scalability Celo is now a ZK fault-proof rollup - let's dive into what that means ↓
27
13
5
117
61,326
iquidus retweeted
EigenDA's Hokulea library has been audited by @VeridiseInc, specialists in formal verification and ZK security. Hokulea enables trustless EigenDA derivation for OP Stack rollups, supporting integrations for leading zkVM fraud proof frameworks 🧵
13
5
1
31
2,902
iquidus retweeted
"Framework for AltDA Secure Integration on Ethereum" - @eigen_da team AltDA integrations expand Ethereum's design space, but most design and implementations are under-specified for L2 security. This is the first formalization of what secure integration requires: a foundation for trustless systems. This formalizes the same principles applied in @l2beat's framework.
8
4
4
43
13,458
iquidus retweeted
Bringing crypto to the cloud era means GB/s throughput. No general-purpose database could get us there. So we built our own: LittDB.
27
11
18
111
76,843
iquidus retweeted
Funny story time. About eight months ago, when I started working more closely with the EigenDA team, I walked around doing vibe checks on our engineering with our partners. Many people did not have a view on the protocol itself, but they were very sure of one thing: our integration was “sub-optimal.” The main complaint was always the same. Too complicated. Everyone else is “so clean.” EigenDA is the messy one. I took it personally. I assumed it meant we weren't doing a good job on the integration side. I promised we would do better. Then I went back and really dug in. After going deep on the DA integration path, I was so surprised to realize that the issue was not that our integration team was bad. It was exactly the opposite. They were so good. They were so good that they solved the problems that others didn't know existed. The extra “complexity” was us wiring in real guarantees where others were cutting corners. The gap was marketing and product. People did not understand what was happening or why we were doing what we were. We were ahead of the market, if you will. So I started going around explaining it. But they didn't care much because it is just DA and they had other priorities. Fair. But more recently we walked L2Beat through our view of rollup infra and integration. They dug in, built their own grading framework, and ended up converging on many of the same principles. Now they are baking a lot of that thinking into how they will evaluate L2s going forward. Funny how fast things can change. L2Beat post: forum.l2beat.com/t/secure-in… Ours: ethresear.ch/t/framework-for…
56
13
2
68
6,341