
Connoisseur of lewd jokes and bawdy music. I'm no good with words. Don't use 'em much, myself. SRE @quantcast. Previously: @Twitter SRE, @Yahoo SE
CA, USA
Joined July 2008
- Tweets17.9K
- Following205
- Followers637
- Likes12.5K
Lunatech retweeted
Another way the current administration is trapped in the ZERO-SUM FALLACY: The H-1B visa situation.
+ You are NOT taking a job from a citizen, rather creating jobs by increasing overal economic output. Plus these people (even vegetarians) SPEND locally.
+ The US has long been benefiting from other countries' brain drain; without it its edge wd collapse. Tesla, Von Braun, von Neumann, Fermi & Einstein did NOT each take the job of a citizen.
+ It the problem is anti-Indian racism, say it, don't play games.
Lunatech retweeted
The ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problems, it's to have millions of AI-aided human scientists who follow their curiosity and become way more ambitious
Lunatech retweeted
This was already expressed by Seneca who said that if you are trying to distinguish yourself with your strength, an ox will always be stronger than you. So work on being maximally human.
Lunatech retweeted
Replying to @exponential_app
based on previous experience with google tech, i will not touch it with a 10 foot pole. it's also immensely limited.
Lunatech retweeted
Game theory is a yuuuge scam, a field for bullshitters to write performative papers & cite one another. It doesn't generalize from "small world" models to "large world".
@stephen_wolfram showed (#RWRI lecture) that when one uses automata "dominant strategies" s.a. tit-for-tat become inferior.
The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist’s Guide to Success in Business and Life
by Avinash K. Dixit & Barry J. Nalebuff
open library: openlibrary.org/books/OL1015…
review: ianhopkinson.org.uk/2017/10/…
Lunatech retweeted
Arguing that "consciousness arises from a computational substrate, and since AI models are computation, they are likely conscious," is as meaningless as arguing that "living creatures are made of atoms, and since this rock is made of atoms, it is likely alive."
Everything is computation. Sometimes incredibly sophisticated computation, like a chess engine, AlphaGo, google3, or the Linux kernel. That does not make it conscious. A rock being made of atoms does not confer it any of the properties we associate with living things, also made of atoms. Likewise a static input-output program that has *none* of the properties we associate with conscious beings (e.g. information integration, interoception, temporal binding, embodiment, etc.) has no more reason to be presumed conscious than a rock has to be presumed alive.
Humanity has not yet created a conscious computer program, and there are no signs we are close to doing so. When we get close, the case for machine consciousness will be backed by evidence and corroborated by consciousness science (which is a thing), not by evidence-free wishful thinking and cargo culting.
Lunatech retweeted
Many of the "nice" wardrobes you admire from the past were built by people shopping slowly and spending more money. People today want to spend less per garment and shop more often. That's why much of what they purchase is lower quality.
Lunatech retweeted
The "whiteboard defense:" I should be able to pull you aside at any moment and ask you to explain any customer-facing system you've shipped. You should be able to clearly explain how it works and defend the decisions you made. This is my benchmark for responsible AI usage.
I don't expect line-level familiarity with the code. I don't care if you remember the exact function name or implementation detail. You may not even know it. I don't care.
But if I ask "why did you do X instead of Y?", "what happens if this actor behaves maliciously?", "what data structure did you use here and why?", or "where does this fail?" you should be able to answer confidently.
For PoCs, demos, experiments, whatever: I don't care. Generate 100% of it and understand none of it. Speed over quality every time in those specific scenarios.
But if you're shipping customer-facing work, you can't be shipping things you don't understand at a high level.
Lunatech retweeted
Replying to @PessimistsArc
Right. Dario was already claiming that GPT2 was too dangerous to open source back in 2019.
I made fun of them then.
Everyone should make fun of them now.
Lunatech retweeted
Mathematicians rank problems according to their difficulty. Society looks at them in terms of relevance.
I've fought that cancer in mathematical finance where these retards ignore v. relevant issues, some critical, because they deem them trivial.
Let AI wipe them out.
Lunatech retweeted
This is the type of post I might regret later, but I really had an urge to rant about the current discourse around pacing the frontier. lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/9/12/p…
Lunatech retweeted
Contrast the present hysteria with Los Alamos.
The Manhattan Project scientists thought the first nuclear explosion could ignite the atmosphere and end humanity.
They did the math. They determined it wouldn’t. And they proceeded.
Because they weren’t fighting a thought experiment. They were fighting the Nazis.
Effective Altruism inverts this. Multiply a sufficiently horrifying hypothetical future by enough hypothetical future humans and suddenly speculation acquires the moral authority of fact.
That’s not empiricism. It’s secular eschatology.
Take risks seriously. Do the work. Engineer against them.
But don’t confuse the ability to imagine the apocalypse with the authority to rule the present.
Lunatech retweeted
The entire city of San Francisco is spooked and on edge due to AI safety shit, it’s insane how much it’s bleeding into my everyday life. Like I was at my bus stop and I notice a guy looking really stressed out so I said hey, are you worried about misaligned AI too? He took out an AirPod and said “what?” So I said you know stuff like agent swarms, AI escaping RL sandboxes, existential risk. He paused his Barstool podcast and said “sorry, what? What are you talking about?” Just the mention of this stuff made him too anxious to speak, I think. So I said I know man, what?! is my reaction to all this too, and then asked him what his p(doom) is. He then said “dude is this some gay thing or something because I have no fucking clue what you’re asking me” then he got on the bus. People are not handling all this news well. It’s really affecting us. All of us.
Lunatech retweeted
My wild goose chase about this precious place has finally yielded some answers. Ghar mil gaya!
flashbackbollywood.substack.…
When the Mountain Does Not Keep the Promise
I went to Kailash with Isha in 2008. I know how the sojourn works, because I paid for it, sat in the jeeps, felt the thin air at Manasarovar, and watched how the money and the risk were managed.
A Nepal tour operator handled the bulk logistics for roughly fourteen thousand rupees a head in those days. The rest of the fee,the premium charged for travelling “with” Jaggi Vasudev,went into the organisation’s pocket. That is not a revelation. It is how packaged pilgrimages work. Call it spirituality if you like, the arithmetic is ordinary business.
The claim that was not ordinary was the one attached to the brand: that people come back alive because of grace. Sadhguru has said versions of this for years,that he will not let you die, that bringing large groups home from Kailash is something only he can do. After the August 2026 flood at Gyirong, when one Isha group was at the immigration building as the water and silt arrived, those sentences sit differently. About eighty people from that group remain unaccounted for. In a calamity, the minimum ethic is not another discourse on hidden dimensions. It is to stop selling the idea that the body is exempt from weather, altitude, and timing.
The quieter method behind the “everyone returns” record is not occult. Most independent groups still attempt the parikrama,the three-day circuit around the mountain at sixteen thousand feet and above, on foot or by mule, where oxygen is scarce and people do die. Isha’s pattern, at least as I lived it, was different. You do not do the full girivalam. You are taken to Manasarovar, told to meditate, given darshan of the eastern face, and brought back by vehicle. The explanation offered is that Kailash, as Meru, is properly seen from the east, the other sides do not count in the same way, so the dangerous circuit is unnecessary. Whether that is theology or risk management, the effect is the same: you avoid the stretch where the probability of a last breath is highest.
I learned the limit of that arrangement in my own body. At Manasarovar I felt the air fail. My body began pulling oxygen from my blood,a high-altitude crisis I had never known. The mystical interventions did nothing I could measure. I was left at a Chinese hospital, alone. I do not remember how many days I was there. I went through what felt like three near-death episodes. Medicine and descent brought me back. The “powers” did not.
That is the part that matters now. Charging a premium to sit in the same convoy is a business choice. Telling people that grace will keep them from dying is a different kind of product. When a glacier collapse and a flood erase an immigration hall, physical law does not pause for a master who has said he has been to Kailash fifty-one times. The families of the missing are not owed another story about inner fire. They are owed the recognition that the trip was sold as protected, and that protection was always logistics, timing, and the decision not to walk the hardest path.
I came home from the lake. Others, this month, did not even get that far. The mountain does not keep promises. People make them. When the water comes, only the latter can be judged.
(post was inspired by the story
“I Will Not Let You Die”: Sadhguru’s Promise to Kailash Pilgrims in Nepal thesaviorcomplex.substack.co… )

























