
Won 13-8 In scrims. felt good. didnt watch vod
but one round we shouldnt have won. full buy, everything went wrong, someone clutched a 1v3 and saved it
next scrim no clutch. lost 8-13. no clue why
winning hides the bad rounds. you gotta watch the wins you shouldnt have won
built a model for @SailOnPast that knows when u shouldve lost — or shouldve won. learns ur team round by round and flags the rounds that actually mattered, the ones hiding inside ur wins and losses
Still the model need more data tuning
Quick reads I check every trial:
🚩 High K/D + low KAST = stat-padder
🚩 High FB + high FD = reckless, will tilt
🚩 Low util DMG on initiator = kit-wasting
🚩 Comms ≤2/5 = will collapse team comms
✅ KAST ≥70% = round-impact player
✅ Coachability 5/5 = skills compound from here
Stats #6–9: The non-stat signals.
Most trials are won HERE, not on the scoreboard:
• Comms (info + IGL ability) • Mental / tilt resistance • Adaptability • Coachability ← single highest-leverage trait
1.3 K/D player who tilts at 0–3 = liability. 0.95 K/D player who calls clean = foundation.
small W, scrim summaries now auto post to discord the second the vod drops
halves split, buy type win%, who's actually carrying vs dragging. acs alone is cope
every team i've watched does post scrim on vibes lol. this just puts the numbers in front of you before anyone can start the "i think we just need to comm more" speech
next: opponent tendency tagging💜


















