France
Joined April 2018
hk🔶 retweeted
I am a developer I am building and creating Good News. I have not asked the terra-luna:native community or my followers for a single Penny. I am still testing my game for bugs and I’m sure we will always find something to improve. I will be sharing a web version for instant easy play Free Fun Fair and many exciting additions coming before the end of this year. Something for the entire community to share and compete in a friendly way. The game will include “Validator Teams” and recognition to ALL who help run this chain. Yes, All. Here is a short teaser video Standby for a link 🔗 Have a great day!
🤖 Made with AI
4
8
33
592
hk🔶 retweeted
I’m seeking to find someone to discuss the current proposal with me. LUNA Classic Proposal 12234 CosmWasm code upload restriction
Technical assessment October 20, 2026 What is being proposed would change the x/wasm code_upload_access setting from Everybody to Nobody, requiring governance approval to upload new smart-contract code. It is a permission change, rather than a software upgrade. According to its description, existing contracts, execution and instantiation would remain unaffected. No private address receives special upload privileges, and future governance could reverse the restriction or approve an address list. Voting ends October 26, 2026, at 6:52 p.m. Eastern. [1] Potential benefits • Reduces unrestricted introduction of new code and creates a community approval checkpoint before deployment. • Could help contain a credible attack that requires uploading fresh code. Its value depends on the actual threat. • Uses an established CosmWasm permission mechanism and preserves a governance route for future changes. [2] Potential drawbacks and gaps • Slower security fixes and development. An existing application needing newly uploaded replacement code would face governance approval, even though its current operation remains unaffected. • Limited protection. Restricting uploads does not repair existing vulnerable contracts or eliminate risks from code already available on chain. • Approval does not establish safety. A vote needs supporting technical review; governance alone is not a code audit. • Missing operational detail. The supplied summary does not specify an emergency process, review standards, a transition plan or a reassessment date. Technical opinion The available evidence does not establish that this change is necessary. It is a defensible precaution if core developers can explain a credible threat, but an indefinite restriction also creates a deployment bottleneck. Before supporting it, request a core-developer risk assessment, a workable process for urgent patches and legitimate uploads, and confirmation that the executable proposal changes only the intended setting. A temporary restriction with a defined review date may be appropriate if an immediate risk is substantiated. Scope: This is a design assessment, not a code audit. The full discussion and executable on-chain payload were not retrieved. Pros and cons are technical inferences from the stated change and upstream documentation; Terra Classic implementation details remain to be verified. Sources [1] Proposal discussion supplied by the user  Open source (discourse.luncgoblins.com/t/…) [2] CosmWasm upstream governance documentation  Open source (github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/bl…) The terra-luna:native community members deserve to understand what we are being asked to vote on. I will try to get answers openly on X
1
6
1
25
700
hk🔶 retweeted
I’m working on something that will be Free Fun Fair Competitive and hopefully bring people together. Especially the terra-luna:native community. I’m still testing and having fun….
1
5
22
379
hk🔶 retweeted
Here is today’s Giggle Academy donation wallet receipt 🧾
5
18
427
damn..
Do you think it will never come? or that it will take a very long time? I DON'T THINK SO! It will come sooner than everyone expects. #LUNC $LUNC
4
6
45
3,779
Get your Hog for free or even better make a donation to Giggle Academy and get your upgraded hog , just ask @_JCH01 , he is one of the best validators of our chain , stake with him and you get some nice rewards and also have a change of winning Lunc This is my beautiful Hog
1
3
52
hk🔶 retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
@elonmusk @cz_binance @x Hi @support please unsuspend @greenpeace06_09 his account is one of the a few that provides actual education in the $lunc chain we have a lot of scammers that suggest getting layer 2 coins , and people that are just blatantly scamming, #fightforwhatsright
3
13
1
40
1,617
You're climbing the ranks one by one—soon you'll be in the top 20! Time to redelegate to @_JCH01 a good, honest, and transparent validator. $LUNC
Waking up to Rank#24 was a surprise. Clearly the terra-luna:native community is appreciating Transparency, Truth, Honesty, Unity, and maybe some Free coins 🤣. Either way, I appreciate every single coin. Thank You for your support. 2 more days until LUNA STRIKE FORCE BNB turns six months old. We have come a long way. I wonder where we will be in another 6 months.
1
1
3
229
the cosmonaut with $LUNC on board
green wave incoming, who’s ready? 🌊
6
287
hk🔶 retweeted
Please help me locate this wallet DM Me for your Free terra-luna:native Thank you for your support
3
12
188
hk🔶 retweeted
One of the wallet winners asked if I would send their free coins to Giggle Academy donation wallet. That’s why they are called Hogs with a Heart 💜 Thank you for your support
1
4
16
442
hk🔶 retweeted
Good morning terra-luna:native community. Apparently the community wanted to help me achieve my personal six month goal of making it into the Top 25. Thank you I will continue to be a calm Voice for my delegates of LUNA STRIKE FORCE BNB We are a group of community investors just like you. We want to see this chain recover just like you. We are sharing our vote together on all proposals and we appreciate having our questions asked, so we can be just as excited as the person who put up a proposal, just as excited as you were writing it. Give us the chance to ask questions, learn from the very person who is asking for our vote, and earn a Yes. So simple. Please respect if we vote anything outside of a yes. Respect our opinions. We are not always going to agree. That is life. I do think it would be appropriate to reach out to seek opinions first on any idea to see how the community feels about it before putting up a proposal that nobody was expecting and now we only have 7 days to get on the same page and if we don’t we are idiots and everyone remains pissed and divided. Consider changing the approach if you are not happy with the results over and over again. We can work together but we have to get beyond Anger, Hate, and you are either with me or against me mentality. It just is t working. I believe my opinions shared openly here, have given the community at least one validator now in the top 25. One who will listen and try to see all three sides. Opinions, facts, and the middle ground. I’m not saying I’m the only good guy either. Don’t read into that statement with anger. I am careful with each word that might be used adversely as a trigger statement. That is not my intention. The world isn’t black and white when it comes to business. They refer to it in America as the Gray area. Sadly the Gray area is about a mile wide and growing. Since day one I said I will try and Unite like minded people. The same people seem to be delegating to me because I have demonstrated I mean what I say and back it up openly here. I have stated many months of second Chance Pro. I was genuinely asking for anyone who is building or asking for community pool funds to share where the community stands with whatever we funded. Crickets…. Please before you say anything, think about the last statement. We would love to be as excited as you for doing something amazing for this chain, but equally important, we the community. Especially if you needed approved community pool funds. Everyone is here with investment money. All of us. Each validator wants to earn a profit at some point. It’s a business. I think anyone being honest would agree. Let me know if you disagree Let’s discuss it. My DMs are open to everyone. I prefer it to be open for the entire community here. For my Hogs, a special Thanks for crushing my goal. I will be picking the 25 wallets for the FREE 100,000 LUNC coins each today. I appreciate your support Thank You 🙏
2
8
1
26
626
Stake with him he is nice validator for $LUNC
4 days to go…. Less than 300 Million coins away from rank #25 Clearly the terra-luna:native community likes Transparency Truth Trust Supporting CZ’s Giggle Academy Or the A-10 I’m going with all of the above. 2.5 Million coins are ready for deployment when you press the button. I appreciate every coin.
4
3
105
hk🔶 retweeted
Dear @GiggleAcademy and @cz_binance I am so proud to share the terra-luna:native community, Hogs with a Heart ❤️, have achieved our goal of reaching 40,000,000 coins today. This donation wallet was set up a few months ago and it is Yours, anytime you want it. terra1etqk8j2wnqkc05qu6d4eydc4he2ffzmh08rhzu CZ, We made you this special custom X hog and the donation on your behalf to show our support for you! We appreciate everything you have done for all of us. Thank You. 🙏 Here is today’s receipt 🧾
16
15
4
26
2,503
hk🔶 retweeted
Hog #333
2
13
393
hk🔶 retweeted
Why Are There Two Terra Chains and Two Tokens, LUNC and LUNA? It all goes back to Terra’s (@terra_money) collapse in May 2022, when its algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD ($UST) lost its dollar peg. The collapse triggered a death spiral. As UST struggled to recover, the protocol minted more LUNA, flooding the market and sending both tokens into a historic crash. But the Terra community chose two different paths forward. (1) Terra Classic (terra-luna:native) The original Terra blockchain continued operating after the collapse under the name Terra Classic. Its original LUNA token was renamed Luna Classic (LUNC), while UST became TerraClassicUSD ($USTC). The community continued working on the original network, including governance decisions and efforts to address its huge token supply. (2) Terra 2.0 (base:0x55cd6469f597452b5a7536e2cd98fde4c1247ee4) In May 2022, the community approved a proposal to launch a new Terra blockchain, which went live on May 28, 2022. The new network retained the Terra name and the LUNA ticker but did not revive the original UST algorithmic stablecoin mechanism. It was intended to give developers and applications a fresh start after the collapse. (3) Why Are There Two Tokens? LUNC belongs to the original Terra Classic chain, while LUNA belongs to the newer Terra 2.0 network. They have separate token supplies, governance systems, and ecosystems. They are not interchangeable, and holding one does not mean holding the other. Terraform Labs wound down its operations in 2024, so both chains are now community-run. Both networks have continued independently, with their futures depending on development, community participation, adoption, and market conditions.
15
92
8
482
45,684
👀
Final hint 🧠 The three pieces become one mind. One for everyone. One for the pros. One that's been there all along.
63
the biggest crypto opportunities often look insignificant before they gain momentum. one shift in attention can turn an overlooked project into the next major narrative.
158
84
21
689
44,374
I still disagree with this. I will say "crypto will absolutely grow 1000x and more!" Just reaching USD market cap will give it close to 1000x, (that's just one currency with severely restricted use case), and the derivatives market is so much bigger.
To be clear, I never said that there is "no room for growth" in the crypto ecosystem. I said there is no room for *1000x price increases*. A 1000x price increase from today means $200T in crypto, or ~an entire 70% of today's global wealth being in crypto.
117
571
86
1,895