Multidimensional Decolonial Paradigm of Cosmic Forces. 😷🇹🇴. 🇵🇸🇨🇩🇸🇩🇭🇹🇵🇬🇳🇨🇾🇪🇸🇴🇵🇷🇲🇱🇳🇪🇧🇫🇻🇪🇧🇯 Free ALL oppressed peoples.
Tongva/Kizh Territory (LA)
Joined March 2016
- Tweets29.4K
- Following1.2K
- Followers1.1K
- Likes51K
Pinned Tweet
Please support the Free West Papua campaign by making a donation:
freewestpapua.org/actions/do…
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
People who spend long periods of time at home and slowly lose the desire to go outside often think they're just resting. But psychologically, many of them are experiencing something called mental rumination. It's a state where the brain starts slowing down while the number of thoughts inside keeps increasing and the motivation to do anything slowly disappears. The mind gets stuck in the past, worries about the future and burns itself out. This isn't laziness, it's a nervous system stuck in survival mode. And the longer it lasts, the more distant normal life begins to feel. And the difficult part is that you usually can't escape it through one massive burst of motivation. And sometimes,recovery starts with just one small step.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
People keep pretending that she is but if you know anything about her outside the movie and the case, she fits into a very ordinary type of tech founder and person. So much of her complexity is projected onto her by the viewer who wants her to be an enigma.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
It’s a very good movie but if your takeaway is that Elizabeth Holmes might be a neurodivergent victim I think you have forcibly disconnected yourself from reality.
More specifically, she *obviously* gets The Who’s on First joke—and is profoundly motivated to pretend she doesn’t.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
Now that I’ve watched this documentary I can only say, as someone who deals with system impacted women daily, I left the theater both angry and fascinated. Fascinated because Elizabeth Holmes is the only type of woman I have NEVER dealt with in the advocacy work I do: a rich white woman.
And angry because she is contributing to a narrative that women somehow have it easier in the carceral system than men. Especially as she parades these innocent children around as shields.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
Nathan Fielder says he and Lance Oppenheim kept disagreeing on what was happening with Elizabeth Holmes so they decided the confusion itself was the story
"when I met her, um I remember having this weird experience that I sort of like talk about in there where I’m like she seems so like genuine at times, but then I’m like, ‘No, I’m clocking like tracking my thoughts and being like, “Okay, I know she’s a liar.”’ So, I I couldn’t really It was a weird like mental thing"
"it wasn’t until we started shooting that moments would happen, some of them that are in the film, and then after Lance and I would talk about what we thought happened there, and we’d be completely disagree on what something meant to us or what we thought was happening. And then we were like, ‘Oh, this is a really interesting if we can’t agree on what’s happening, there’s something here’"
"every person that worked on this movie was going through a similar like feeling of cognitive dissonance where we would we would unpack the day’s events, and no one could agree on like the seemingly mundane moments that have that were that would transpire. Everyone had a different point of view"
"we said to A24, like, ‘We cannot promise we’ll deliver anything on this. We don’t know what the story is, but we wanted to just see what will happen if we go with cameras.’ And they were like, ‘Okay, that’s fine. And if you want to pull the plug anytime, you can do it’"
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
Throughout the movie, I kept thinking how Socratic Nathan Fielder’s persona is. I can’t stress how much bullshit you can cut through by asking “Why?” “What do you mean by that?” “What did you understand by that?”
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
This is 100% what we do in psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and that is part of what makes it so difficult. Study Fielder. Examples: 1) the scene where he first questions Billy. 2) The scene where he interjects to ask about the eggs. Even 3) the scene where he says, “no, you don’t.”
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
White racism gets black people killed so I don’t really give a fuck about y’all’s hurt feelings
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
ok i'm putting my foot down. you all have got to stop parroting this stupid "ooooh nathan fielder is so DEVILISHLY DEMONIC, he CHILLS me to the BONE" meme. there are like a million actual rapists working in hollywood. words mean things.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
I’ve seen YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING, everyone, and No one, and I mean NO ONE walks away unscathed.
Elizabeth got exactly what she wanted out of nathan, a24, and the public. To me her scheming was transparent, but the folks around Her haven’t seemed to pick up on any of that.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
Really don't think I've seen a single person give an accurate reading of Elizabeth Holmes' whole deal: that she likes to psychically offload the complexities of life to controlling men so she can retreat and live her dream of playing scientist.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
It’s wild watching white people get hoodwinked again.
Why should Holmes feeling sad about being portrayed on television for the crimes she committed be anyone’s concern? Why are you calling that “harm”? And why the fuck are you laying that at the actor’s feet?
I think Nathan Fielder did a really good job with You Can See Everything. Especially in showing how unwilling Amanda Seyfried was to acknowledge her own role in potentially harming another person. He had everyone looking at one another and questioning everyone else’s intentions, while seemingly being completely unwilling to examine their own behavior. I thought Amanda’s resistance to doing that was especially revealing
I also obviously think Billy is terrible. I think he’s cruel and exploitative. I’ve seen Elizabeth’s tweets for years and thought they were her. Finding out they’re his was jarring and sad.
But as much as I dislike Billy, I think he made a very good point. Why would he care what Amanda thinks? She’s an actress who has profited from portraying his wife as a bizarre and dishonest and manipulative freak to an audience that is largely voyeuristic, incredibly binary in their moral thinking, and seemingly unable to separate fiction from reality
I don’t think that Amanda needed to defend Elizabeth or excuse anything she’s done but I do think it’s bizarre how unwilling she seemed to consider that she might have contributed to another person’s suffering
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
Black People deserve reparations.
Indigenous People deserve Land Back.
This is not controversial.
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
She was giving patients fake lab results, fuck her feelings hit the music
I think Nathan Fielder did a really good job with You Can See Everything. Especially in showing how unwilling Amanda Seyfried was to acknowledge her own role in potentially harming another person. He had everyone looking at one another and questioning everyone else’s intentions, while seemingly being completely unwilling to examine their own behavior. I thought Amanda’s resistance to doing that was especially revealing
I also obviously think Billy is terrible. I think he’s cruel and exploitative. I’ve seen Elizabeth’s tweets for years and thought they were her. Finding out they’re his was jarring and sad.
But as much as I dislike Billy, I think he made a very good point. Why would he care what Amanda thinks? She’s an actress who has profited from portraying his wife as a bizarre and dishonest and manipulative freak to an audience that is largely voyeuristic, incredibly binary in their moral thinking, and seemingly unable to separate fiction from reality
I don’t think that Amanda needed to defend Elizabeth or excuse anything she’s done but I do think it’s bizarre how unwilling she seemed to consider that she might have contributed to another person’s suffering
Protector of Lolofonua🌋🌊✨🏳️🌈 retweeted
if Elizabeth Holmes wanted to be treated better she should’ve been a good person. She’s a conman that use sick people’s hope to validate whatever person she make up, her actions drive people to commit horrible things and yall are working up about somebody portraying of her in tv
I think Nathan Fielder did a really good job with You Can See Everything. Especially in showing how unwilling Amanda Seyfried was to acknowledge her own role in potentially harming another person. He had everyone looking at one another and questioning everyone else’s intentions, while seemingly being completely unwilling to examine their own behavior. I thought Amanda’s resistance to doing that was especially revealing
I also obviously think Billy is terrible. I think he’s cruel and exploitative. I’ve seen Elizabeth’s tweets for years and thought they were her. Finding out they’re his was jarring and sad.
But as much as I dislike Billy, I think he made a very good point. Why would he care what Amanda thinks? She’s an actress who has profited from portraying his wife as a bizarre and dishonest and manipulative freak to an audience that is largely voyeuristic, incredibly binary in their moral thinking, and seemingly unable to separate fiction from reality
I don’t think that Amanda needed to defend Elizabeth or excuse anything she’s done but I do think it’s bizarre how unwilling she seemed to consider that she might have contributed to another person’s suffering