TheBigDeal retweeted
“You’re rich when you don’t have to worry about money. You’re wealthy when you don’t have to worry about time.”
— David Perell
TheBigDeal retweeted
Cures are coming. Abundance is coming. Joy is coming. The future is going to be beautifu
TheBigDeal retweeted
They are going to try to bury this story because it doesn't fit the narrative. Don't let them. This father rushed into the school and within 2 minutes had eliminated the murderer. This story is a lesson and it cannot be forgotten
TheBigDeal retweeted
JUST IN: Michael Saylor says investors will search for assets that robots "can't make more of."
This is profound. Think about it for a second:
Are Nvidia chips really that scarce?
How much gold and oil is still out there?
Bitcoin is the solution!
BREAKING: Federal agents raid Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar's Washington, D.C., home early Monday morning as part of an ongoing federal criminal investigation.
Homeland Security Investigations agents arrived around 6 a.m., with both DHS and the Justice Department involved in the operation.
The DOJ confirms agents executed a judicially authorized search warrant, but officials have not publicly disclosed the full scope of the investigation.
TheBigDeal retweeted
Excited to announce that all super intelligence organizations have now jointly agreed to the ultimate in AI/SI safety:
Moving all testing to Delta Airlines flights, where accessing the Internet is utterly impossible!
TheBigDeal retweeted
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem.
“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.”
Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free but what about the other six men?
The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage.
They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving).
The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving).
The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving).
The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving).
The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving).
And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.
But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.
But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!
And that’s how it works.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
TheBigDeal retweeted
In order to stop Elon Musk from rigging our elections we must:
-Switch to paper ballots
-Enact Voter ID
-Mandate citizenship verification
Mark Ruffalo warns that Democrats need to be watchful for voting machine manipulation and suggests Elon Musk could be involved:
"We need to be on guard for what we may not see coming -- ELON."
"That's the cybersecurity of these elections."
"We know that these systems are vulnerable."
We have been reliably informed for years that this kind of rhetoric Undermines Faith In Elections and is Very Dangerous To Democracy
TheBigDeal retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk @aaronburnett
It is important to appreciate that Gibney’s goal is not truth in any way, shape or form, but rather to undermine my ability to be politically effective. He is a shill for the far left, as even a cursory examination of his public statements makes clear.
TheBigDeal retweeted
No fatties.
No trannies.
No beardos.
No weirdoes.
No wimps.
No radicals — JUST WARRIORS.
TheBigDeal retweeted
BTW, Aalo only spent around $100M total to get to criticality.
That includes our full-scale fuel load, full-scale reactor (no sodium), factory and its machinery, all payroll, regulatory fees, etc. Everything.
The people who told you nuclear has to be expensive are wrong.
TheBigDeal retweeted
Best way to sandbox an AI is to put it on a Delta flight – it will have no chance of accessing the Internet!
TheBigDeal retweeted
The NGOs end up increasing the number of homeless people they manage, because that’s the only way to increase their revenue! Incentives drive outcomes.
“Homeless” is a propaganda word used to describe people on the street who are mentally ill or severely addicted to drugs. The word implies that this is someone who fell a little behind on their mortgage payment and they’re one job offer away from getting back on their feet, which is obviously false if you’ve ever tried talking to a “homeless” person in SF, LA, NY, Austin or anywhere else.
The honest reality is that we need to bring back asylums for extreme mental illness or drug addiction for those who are a serious danger to themselves or others.
Incentives determine outcomes
If you give an NGO a certain number of dollars per homeless person, they will never solve homelessness
SF spends more than $1b/yr (up 5x) and the homeless population has only grown
NGO fraud is so insane, man.





























