greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
We dream big $CULT
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Separation of powers. Confirmed. Parliament is NOT sovereign. Not absolute. rumble.com/v7h05cw-separatio…
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
To those who were here from day one and to those who just joined: remember what truly unites us. We are not here to follow the crowd, we are here because we believe in pure decentralization. 🩸🩸🩸
ethereum:0xf0f9d895aca5c8678f706fb8216fa22957685a13 is not just a token: it's an independent impact tool, built to give real power to the community without compromises. This potential is unique, and it's all still waiting to unfold.
Markets shift, but true technological freedom remains unwavering. Proud of what we’ve defended so far, ready for what we are about to achieve together. Full speed ahead! 🎭
$CULT x $rvlt @wearecultdao
Thank @MrOmodulus and @Artorias_eth for all you have done and are still doing. $CULT @wearecultdao @ModulusZK FOL $MOD
Replying to @CryptodousX @RevoltToEarn
Nobody lost funds. The core selling pressure was always the rewards by design. That selling pressure has ceased and so less liquidity is needed so it was reassigned to Modulus development. We won’t be withdrawing anymore however. Will lock or burn the rest
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
You need to understand Britain is NOT a Country. England is a Country with its own constitution.
The union was the mechanism for this invasion. In the same way the "union" was the mechanism in France and Germany.
There are five laws which need annulling, not repealed, MADE VOID. British Nationality Act 1948/1981 which allowed a Somali to take a seat in the British parliament.
Who killed Sir David Amess? A Somali. They are now law makers. You will not solve anything without addressing this subversion of the English constitution.
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Indeed. With hardship comes ease $cult @ModulusZK
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Replying to @MrOmodulus @IOHK_Charles
Still would never have what @ModulusZK and @wearecultdao have. 🩸🩸🩸
They keep ignoring but one will always be more superior than the other.
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
We have a dream. And by the sheer force of our will. It will become reality.
Never surrender.
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
🚨 ALL EYES ON @ModulusZK
zkFOL time is here and now 🔥
capital will rotate to $CULT (DAO)
this is gonna be violent 🔥🔥🔥
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Letssssss goooooo where's my $CULT family at ❤️❤️❤️✨️
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1AKEmvrWQgAKL
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Mi sto sintonizzando sullo spazio imminente di @harrybo_rg. Ci sarai anche tu? xitter.cf/i/spaces/1AKEmvrWQgAKL
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Calling for a proper tear-down of #zkFOL / @ModulusZK .
The full stack is public and we want people who actually know this space to try to break it.
Docs: docs.moduluszk.io
Code: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol
Paper draft: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol/blob/…
Benchmarks: moduluszk.io
Contracts are first-order logic predicates. They compile directly to polynomial constraints (no bytecode, no zkVM, no execution layer).
A transaction is only accepted if you can prove the predicate holds.
Failures refuse instead of paying out.
Measured fib(10,000) and Sudoku numbers are on the site (desktop CPU, vs RISC Zero & SP1).
What we’d actually value:
Soundness of the shallow FOL → polynomial translation (especially outside the finite models in the paper)
Compiler correctness (predicate → constraint system)
Commitment scheme / setup assumptions
Independent reproduction of the benchmarks
Where this approach is strictly worse, or breaks
Any concrete counter-example or exploit path we missed
Written objections are as useful as confirmations. @0xJaehaerys
@AnnaRRose
@__zkhack__
and anyone else who reviews #proofsystems , #arithmetisation , or #zkVMs .
If you have time and inclination, we’d like the honest version.
Repo, draft, and ePrint (Gabbay 2024/954) are all linked above. @MrOmodulus can help with setup or answer questions in replies.
Tear it apart.
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
If you're already investing in Cult DAO ( $CULT) @wearecultdao , the genius hyper-deflationary ecosystem, you have already won in my opinion.
As we await Ethereum's next major upward move, the underlying mechanics of the ecosystem are worth paying attention to.
With its tax mechanism accumulating ETH in the treasury to further decentralization, a sustained ETH rally could significantly accelerate treasury growth. If Ethereum gains bullish momentum and FOMO kicks in, the combined effect could be monumental, potentially strengthening the ecosystem's capacity to fund its long-term vision.
Add @ModulusZK to the equation, and you get the bigger picture. If these pieces align as anticipated, the strategic advantage could be formidable.
⭐️Patience, deflationary mechanics, treasury growth, and ecosystem expansion. If the thesis plays out as expected, it could be checkmate. ♟️🔥
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! xitter.cf/i/spaces/1AKEmvrWQgAKL
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Replying to @AltGemHunter
@wearecultdao ethereum:0xf0f9d895aca5c8678f706fb8216fa22957685a13 🩸🩸🩸
Moduluszk.io
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Would appreciate independent benchmark reproduction and technical review of the approach.
• Repo: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol
• Paper: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol/bl…
• Docs: docs.moduluszk.io
Replying to @BudzyTV
Would appreciate independent benchmark reproduction and technical review of the approach.
• Repo: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol
• Paper: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol/blob/…
• Docs: docs.moduluszk.io
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
Replying to @andyyy
This is a textbook case of the dynamic in your post.
@wearecultdao (Cult DAO) is a long-running, fully community-owned public good with renounced contracts, tax-funded treasury, and governance by Guardians + stakers. It has no traditional equity or token VC rounds for the core project. It is now building @ModulusZK, a Layer-1 whose smart contracts are written as first-order logic predicates that compile directly into polynomial constraints (zkFOL). There is no bytecode, no VM, and no execution layer the specification is the contract. A state transition is accepted only with a ZK proof that the logical conditions hold; otherwise the transition is refused. This is grounded in Murdoch Gabbay’s 2024 ePrint work on polynomial semantics for FOL (eprint.iacr.org/2024/954) and was made public for review in early October 2026 (GitHub: github.com/zkFOL/zkfol, site: moduluszk.io).
From a classic VC checklist this looks easy to pass on: no structured private round to ape, unconventional (“doesn’t make sense” relative to zkEVM/zkVM mental models), still early (tech just opened for review), and any value capture would be via liquid tokens ($CULT and related) rather than equity. The project’s own messaging highlights structural properties contracts cannot drift from their written rules, defects cause refusal instead of loss, proving is claimed to be orders of magnitude faster and lighter than RISC Zero/SP1 on consumer hardware (e.g., fib(10,000) in ~4.8 ms and <10 MB vs seconds and GBs), and privacy is native because every transaction already carries a proof. Whether those performance and soundness claims hold under independent scrutiny is an open technical question; the architecture is public and the paper exists.
In the liquid-market era you described, success would not show up as a VC fund returning capital from a private allocation. It would show up as open-market participants bidding the associated tokens higher if the tech delivers safer-by-construction contracts, efficient proving, or useful privacy/DeFi primitives and gains real usage. That is exactly the pattern of “we missed it because there was no round / it was too early / it didn’t fit the model” that your Q2 2027 hypothetical VC has to explain to LPs. Cult DAO + Modulus zkFOL is the kind of non-round, community-driven, technically differentiated project that can produce precisely those outcomes.
greg cult dav zK 🩸🩸🩸🏴 retweeted
265 years and beyond. $cult is here to usher the end.

















