
Building @fiber_shop. Operator, Investor, Board Member • Ex @Ticketmaster, @Beatport, @Viggle, @AOL
Colorado, USA
Joined April 2009
- Tweets2.7K
- Following569
- Followers4K
- Likes3.6K
AI assistants are capturing consumer purchase intent, but the infrastructure to execute those purchases hasn't caught up
Consumers are rapidly adopting AI for shopping, but the infrastructure needed to support actual transactions is lagging, big time
While AI is becoming the discovery layer for commerce, traditional retailers still dominate the checkout, blocking a truly agentic flow.
3 biggest findings:
> 53% of consumers already use AI for shopping
That's 53% of consumers globally and 48% in the US have used AI for shopping in just the past three months
AI search in ChatGPT launched in 2024, and in just 2 years, >50% of consumers are using it for shopping
For comparison, it took the internet 15 years to hit a similar metric...
Consumers are hungry for more efficient shopping and directionally, they have shown that search is a place where they'll find it
> AI search has higher conversions than traditional search
AI shoppers were 3.2× more likely to name AI search as their biggest purchase influence compared to traditional search.
That metric is visible through a recent a16z study that highlighted AI traffic showing a 60%+ conversion lift compared to traditional search
Consumers aren't just willing to use AI to shop, they are eager to let their agents not only purchase but also recommend for them
> Structured inventory dramatically improves conversion
Shopify reports that AI searches using its structured product catalog convert at roughly 2x the rate of searches relying on scraped or stale data.
AI assistants are capturing consumer purchase intent, but the infrastructure to execute those purchases hasn't caught up
That means there is a massive gap to exploit for stores - the ones who are willing to adapt are going to win, fast
Agents will favor merchants with a clean path to purchase, but right now checkout is messy and is in dire need of innovation.
Source: mckinsey.com/capabilities/gr…
greg consiglio retweeted
Merchants will pay for exactly one thing in the agent era: certainty that the agent in front of them brings a buyer who converts and does not charge back. Purchase history verified at settlement is the only source of that certainty. Everything else is a guess.
greg consiglio retweeted
JUST IN: Zuck reveals shopping has become the biggest use case for Meta's Muse AI, with over 25% of users shopping through the agent & average purchase exceeding $200.
"Because it doesn't feel like work, people don't do it, but it's probably one of the most important parts of the job."
Ben Horowitz on treating your story as your strategy, and why founders often skip writing it even though it's one of the most important parts of the job:
"The story of the company is also the strategy of the company... In your mind, you're kind of adjusting that strategy a little bit at a time every day. But then a quarter later, it's actually pretty different than what you started with."
"So it's really important that you keep upgrading your story. The articulation of your story. I would definitely recommend it be in written form."
"Something that you can share with everybody in the company, and everybody you're recruiting, everybody you're trying to raise money from, all your constituents, every customer."
"The problem that I think founders have is it doesn't feel like work. Like, 'What are you doing today?' 'I'm working on my story.' That doesn't sound like work."
"Because it doesn't feel like work, people don't do it, but it's probably one of the most important parts of the job."
@bhorowitz w/ @speedrun GP @Tocelot
greg consiglio retweeted
DATA: Are AI assistants launching a new era of agentic commerce?
@danhilltech, head of consumer product at @stripe, thinks so.
I spoke to him for exclusive intel on how 70+ assistants currently use @link, including how much they spend, and on what 👀
upstartsmedia.com/p/data-str…
👀
AI is helping Americans shop, but 42% don't trust it to make a purchase yet
Even in the most popular categories, only about a quarter would let AI choose and buy for them:
- 27% for clothing
- 26% for electronics
- 25% for travel
Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/this-week-in-cha…
We were promised flying cars…
Stay technical on agent checkout. Stay in the details of trust, memory, criteria, and delivery constraints. Stay at the frontier. Easy to fall behind while still running great human ecommerce
Ok, this was a goldmine of insights re: the future of commerce with agents, straight from @finkd + @alexandr_wang
24 key takeaways:
1/ Zuckerberg says agentic commerce is not a 20% conversion lift. It actually creates customers who never existed
-> He used Instacart ~2x a year on Priscilla’s account. Got his own account for Muse. Now orders 1-2x a week. "I am a new Instacart subscriber, and I just wouldn’t have done this before."
2/ Meta’s CEO just asked the scariest retail question of the decade: is the Instacart account for me, or for my Muse?
-> Over time agents effectively get accounts. TAM for commerce is no longer "number of people." Anyone who sits this out "is gonna end up feeling sad"
3/ Muse is one of the first products where people fully delegate purchases to an agent
-> Wang: agentic shopping left the slide deck. "It’s really happening." Teas, groceries, random products. Trust, not demos
4/ Zuckerberg’s Saturday baking loop is the agentic commerce demo nobody scheduled
-> Muse + daughter Aurelia invent recipes. Instacart ingredients land before bake time. Watermelon launch weekend: Muse threw a watermelon in the bag unprompted
5/ John Collison calls agentic commerce a discontinuous event for how all business pipes work
-> Demand shifts toward agents the way demand shifted from brick-and-mortar to ecommerce. Old channels stay. Their share of the pie shrinks
6/ The long-run board question for every brand: do you want a slice of agentic demand, or not?
-> Agentic commerce grows as a portion of the pie. Sitting it out is a strategy choice, not a wait-and-see default
7/ Collison told Patrick Collison in 2023 he was "way behind the eight ball" on agentic commerce
-> "Agents are gonna be buying things, and you’re not prepared for it." Directionally correct. Three years early. Stripe Sessions May announcements. Volume only went vertical as of September
8/ Stripe’s bet: agent-to-commerce is clearly how people will buy things
-> Buying-stage friction was always broken. Early AI product research already had PMF. Computer use was "the last big unlock." Ask Muse to buy almost anything and it figures it out
9/ Computer use is the ultimate backwards-compatibility layer for commerce
-> No need for every merchant to rebuild for agents first. The agent can operate the old web. Nat obsessed over this set of problems at Meta
10/ Muse’s commerce value prop is not "better ads." It is deleted research tabs
-> No clicking 12 sites. Criteria auto-apply: "I need it by Wednesday" and the agent only shops what can arrive by Wednesday. Keyword search was insane by comparison
11/ Wang’s Euler Muse already runs a weekly obscure-tea procurement desk
-> Farms in Taiwan and Japan. Sourced and delivered. Personal agent as buyer, not chatbot
12/ Zuck’s consumer thesis kills the search-box internet for a big share of demand
-> Most people don’t actually like reading that much. Text is tolerated. Glasses + vision + voice become the buy surface. Maybe no app store. Generate the purchase path in your field of view
13/ Meta rejected "coding is all that matters" because consumer agents live in multimodal reality
-> People film, watch, listen, talk. Commerce agents that only read docs lose the real world where buying happens
14/ Dedicated VM per agent is a commerce prerequisite, not a security nice-to-have
-> Nobody hands an agent a credit card on shared elastic compute. Privacy has to feel real before delegated checkout scales
15/ Meta AI still reaches "a ton of people" and Zuck still calls it retrieval, not delegation
-> Chat that answers is not commerce. Commerce starts when the agent gets stuff done and spends
16/ "Everyone is going to write tons of code. They’re just not going to know they’re writing code"
-> Same pattern for checkout flows, vendor research, returns, reorders. The user stays in the intent. The agent ships the pipeline
17/ Stripe × Muse integration already works well enough that Collison called it out on air
-> Coding agents + commerce rails. Developer path and consumer path converging on the same buy graph
18/ OpenRouter already routes 10T+ tokens a day across hundreds of models
-> Model gateway becomes part of the commerce stack: price route, outage route, experiment route. Stripe agreed to acquire it in the same arc
19/ After SFT, desired agent behaviors only fire ~10% of the time. RL is what makes a buyer reliable
-> A shopping agent that follows "by Wednesday / under $40 / organic only" 10% of the time is a toy. Elicitation is the product
20/ Product obsession math still applies at checkout: each nuance may be ~2% to the user
-> In aggregate that is why one agent becomes the default buyer and another gets uninstalled after one bad order
21/ Active memory is a commerce moat
-> Remember dietary rules, kid allergies, preferred farms, last bad SKU, standing Saturday bake. OpenClaw-style compaction that goes buggy AF cannot be your household buyer
22/ Brands that only optimize human conversion rate are solving last cycle’s problem
-> Zuck’s line: opportunity is not "20% more efficient on the conversion rate." Opportunity is net-new subscribers created by agent workflows
23/ The unit of demand is shifting from a person with a browser to a person with an agent that has accounts
-> TAM expands because agents shop while humans sleep, train, parent, and work. Frequency jumps (2x/year → 1-2x/week) before price sensitivity even moves
24/ Closing frame from the pint, applied to retail
-> Stay technical on agent checkout. Stay in the details of trust, memory, criteria, and delivery constraints. Stay at the frontier. Easy to fall behind while still running great human ecommerce
greg consiglio retweeted
Satya is right. The way to make SI safe is not to train it with a sense of self, its own moral philosophy, and permission to act as a conscientious objector. That’s the “alignment” approach and it magnifies the control problem.
The engineering approach that Satya describes is different: separate the supply of intelligence from authority over it. Surround non-deterministic models with deterministic controls, observability, privilege limits, logging, and the ability to always contain or shut them down. Treat models/agents like powerful insider risks, not moral patients whose psychological wellbeing is at stake.
As Satya points out, the most trustworthy system is the one that lets us trust the model the least — not the one that encourages the model to develop independent agency and grievances. Engineering safety is not the same thing as “alignment.”
100% @fiber_shop
Too many founders in the AI bubble have lost sight on what the average person wants and it shows in their marketing.
People love online shopping, planning trips, and all the fun little things that distract them from their real lives.
If you want to make money with personal agents.
Find a way to make or save them money and remove the activities they consider actual problems.
greg consiglio retweeted
Merchants already spend enormous sums to acquire customers they know nothing about. Paying less for customers they know everything about is not a hard sell. It is a relief.
greg consiglio retweeted
I think fundamentally we've ~now arrived at the correct form factor for mass consumer AI:
It was never going to be Google's search box but with AI, and a left-hand list of Chats was a 18mo experiment that has reached 100M users but won't be the thing that will scale to 1B users for next 10yrs —
it will be messaging with a single bot, occasionally split to specific bots for special areas of work/life.
Still ton of innovation to be done, e.g., in the bots–bots collab mechanisms, credentials, computer use, and generally optimizing the heck out of everything …
… but the form factor has settled; the iPhone Classic has landed; the News Feed has been established.
Every industry that added agents eventually needed a layer of trust between the agents and the counterparties. Finance, insurance, real estate. Agentic Commerce is next.
greg consiglio retweeted
Bot detection & human verification will be one of the most urgent demands for businesses over the coming years. Agent swarms will suffocate every website and form; small companies and government websites are most vulnerable.
There is a huge gap in the market for this right now. When we looked at what offerings were in the market to use at X, there was not a single company that brought together all the latest technologies so we had to do it all in-house.
"AI represents machine-native intelligence, while digital assets represent machine-native money."
Our latest research paper explores the growing connection between AI and digital assets and explains why broad AI adoption may drive new demand, utility and applications across the digital asset economy. blackrock.com/us/individual/…
greg consiglio retweeted
JUST IN: BlackRock says AI agents will drive major demand for crypto stablecoins and blockchain payments.
greg consiglio retweeted
Every AI shopping agent will know its buyer. The merchant on the other end will know nothing. That asymmetry is one of the defining problems of agentic commerce, and it is the one Fiber exists to solve.
greg consiglio retweeted
I have a recommendation to help bring some sanity to this whole AI doomerism situation that is appropriately exploding today.
If any reporter can get one of the "true believers" to sit for a real interview (if they can't, that is an important tell), they should use a technique known as the "Five Whys" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_w….
The "five" number is arbitrary, but the point is to drill down into the details and steps required to get to the catastrophic end-point.
You can't take down all of humanity without a few intermediate steps. Let's talk through each of those. It's quite a useful exercise.
It would help us all think more clearly, and possibly the doomerists as well.





















