It's important to distinguish between supporting legal immigration generally and advocating specifically for tech immigration to fill high-skilled jobs. While both positions have merit, they're driven by different motivations and have distinct implications. Often, those in the tech industry who express concerns about unfilled positions and visa challenges primarily focus on the need for skilled workers. This perspective, while understandable, overshadows the broader context of immigration and the diverse needs and contributions of immigrants from all walks of life. We need to remember that contributions to American society come in many forms, and a narrow focus on high-skilled immigration can obscure the immense potential of individuals who may arrive with very limited resources and experience. Examples abound, but consider the remarkable cases of just two refugees who had immense impact on tech: Sergey Brin fled the Soviet Union with his family as a child; and Andy Grove, who escaped Hungary and revolutionized tech with the microprocessor. Neither were “skilled workers” at the time of admission to the US. A truly balanced immigration system should consider not only the demands of the tech sector but also the value of immediate family reunification, humanitarian concerns, and the overall enrichment that diverse forms of immigration bring to our society. To fulfill the long-term promise of America as a nation of opportunity, we must recognize and embrace the potential of all legal immigrants, not just those who would serve the short term needs of the tech sector.