Sydney, Australia
Joined December 2016
Felix Thomsen retweeted
Feels like anything that is classically tractable is now going to be solved - and commoditized - very quickly. As a consequence, I’m optimistic that the set of problems that are fundamentally resistant to classical computers will become more obvious, more crisply understood, and maybe more urgent
my favorite line from geohot is "I can’t believe that some stupid combination of lasers and cold shit get you access to a different order of computational complexity." i bet you stupid combination of lasers and cold shit will give you a different order of computational complexity, albeit probably not in the way thats originally intended.
2
2
13
1,174
Really happy to release Pinnacle 1.1. New results across spin qubits, neutral atoms, trapped ions and superconducting qubits. iceberg-quantum.com/blog/pin…
1
3
14
723
Work with @diraqQC and @nvidia: we've validated that Pinnacle’s logical performance advantage holds up under the constraints of silicon spin-qubit hardware, and compiled logical circuits all the way down to physical operations using CUDA-Q Logical.
1
4
1
18
1,458
More of a lurker than a tweeter til now, but I agree with others who've said now is a good time to openly discuss feelings about AI in (quantum computing) research. So: would like to officially declare myself in camp 2 -- excited about the coming years!
Mixed timeline here on twitter with 2 camps: 1) this is the end of science for humans (because their input will soon be irrelevant) 2) this is the best time for science because we now have extremely powerful tools that makes us 1000x better researchers. Rooting very much for #2
1
1
9
527
Felix Thomsen retweeted
I got my first consulting testimonial 😼😸
6
2
113
2,993
For a while I have been trying to figure out how to articulate this idea that we need to be better people and care more. By "we", I mean technologists. We are again having this conversation, so it seems like a good time to get it out of my head. I find that many who take technology as a practice---an approach to life, work, anything---are of better character than those in the industry. The virtues of the hacker are, well, virtuous: they espouse a way of living that is good for the individual and good for the collective. But technology-the-industry is dominated by ideologies of outcomes. We think it needs must, because that is the only way you get the kind of extreme growth and scale that modern technology-the-industry demands: by doing it at all costs. The ends justify the means. In a competitive environment like technology-the-industry, such an approach will inevitably lead to the means rotting. Rot shows as a lack of integrity. We tolerate low integrity on a lot of scales in technology-the-industry and technology-the-culture. In the technology social set, duplicity is quite accepted, though certainly not ubiquitous. In technology startups, it is entirely normal to set fake targets, lie to investors, and sell visions that are, quite simply, not real. I am optimistic that this now seems to be falling apart. Why does this matter? Because technology is the most important industry in the world. It is how we bring the future closer. It is the dominant force in the modern western economy. It is a significant political power base. It is both the culture and the counter-culture. As Stewart Brand once wrote, "we are as gods and we might as well get good at it." How do we get good at it? I think it starts by seeing that there can be virtuous winners in tech and that virtue both takes and imparts strength. The greatest leaders have powerful virtues to match their great faults. Many of our most prominent current technology leaders have significant virtues: long-term thinking, generosity, mistrust of authority, anti-credentialism, incredible willpower and resilience. These are not soft qualities! In the fullness of time, virtue persists because vice is expensive, even if vice is the faster to start. In the fullness of time, we can be our better selves.
16
12
1
123
7,255
Felix Thomsen retweeted
turns out you can break RSA with just 100k physical qubits...
2
2
1
8
587
Today we’re releasing Pinnacle, our first fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture. It shows that order-of-magnitude reductions in the cost of fault tolerance are possible, with meaningful implications for timelines to useful quantum computing. We’ve also raised a $6m Seed round.
2
5
3
41
9,684
Excited to have been part of this project @IcebergQuantum helping to make useful quantum computers a reality as soon as possible! Check out our blog to learn more: iceberg-quantum.com/blog/mod…
4
15
2,444
New and better gadgets for gates on LDPC codes:
2
322
Felix Thomsen retweeted
building our first quantum computer @IcebergQuantum
1
4
360
proud of the team. more to come!
excited to share some of what we’ve been cooking up at Iceberg. we introduce fast surgery, a method for performing logic in qldpc codes quicker. check out our blog post. iceberg-quantum.com/blog/fas…
1
6
771
another one! thrilled to be working with the team at @diraqQC. already a super productive collab
We're working with Diraq to accelerate the path to useful quantum computing with spin qubits. diraq.com/newsdesk/iceberg-q…
1
9
488
god i love startups. i love the momentum. i love the chaos. i love how productivity compounds in a group and how the clock speed of the org builds with the right people. it’s delicious.
3
2
80
4,145
Excited about this collaboration with Oxford Ionics. LDPC + trapped ions is a very promising path to fault tolerance!
Oxford Ionics and @IcebergQuantum have partnered together as part of our participation in Stage A of the United States' DARPA Quantum Benchmarking Initiative. Follow the link to our website to learn more: oxionics.com/announcements/o…
2
11
1,238