AI and Libraries, Scholarly Communication, Indexing/ Publishing/ Open Access. YouTube https://xitter.cf/t.co/ADKbxSVocR
Delhi, India/ Bharat
Joined December 2007
- Tweets7.2K
- Following89
- Followers827
- Likes2.3K
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
AI in Collection Development & Resource Management drlibsc.com/2025/12/ai-in-co…
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
📣 NEW on the Research Musings Substack: "Meet the librarians: AI roles inside @DSDimensions."
Hélène Draux reimagines the various #ArtificialIntelligence methodologies as a library ecosystem. Who are the "librarians" & what different roles does #AI play? 📚
🔗 ow.ly/TJE350XHrLU
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
#Libraries use #AI for more than search. They power access, discovery & collaboration across the GLAM sector.
Read what #LibrarIN_eu has to say on its latest policy brief 🔗librarin.eu/download/23036
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
#AI is changing how #libraries work, from metadata to multilingual access.
But it’s not just tech: it’s about trust, ethics & governance.
Read more on #librarin_eu's new policy brief🔗librarin.eu/download/23036
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Structuring Your AI Assisted Lit Review - Let AI do the heavy lifting—while you stay in charge of the insight. 🔍 Search smarter 🧵 Cluster themes 🧠 Summarize critically ✍️ Reflect, don’t just copy 📌 Cite responsibly
#LiteratureReview #AI #AcademicWriting #PhDLife #researcher
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
A thing I noticed with researchers & many librarians is that they struggle to understand how different indexes like Dimensions, Lens, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex , other crossref based indexes are vs traditional databases. You can sort of tell by the qs they ask about them. (1)
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Most PhD students fail at research questions.
(I used to be one of them)
See, back when I started my research journey, I thought coming up with research questions was pure luck.
Just throw something at the wall and hope it sticks.
Wrong.
Here’s the step-by-step breakdown:
ALT 4 steps to building a research question infographic
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
We took a look at one of Beall's early papers. Do you think that anything has changed since he expressed these views, over ten years ago?
Take a look at this 🧵.
Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. buff.ly/3sQ5Awz
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
The secret to better LLM results?
It's all in how you ask:
Role: Define who the AI should be
Context: Set the scene and background
Task: Specify the action or goal
Format: Determine the desired output structure
It's how my prompt drafts start.
RTF + CTF = better results.
ALT An overview of the 4 components of a good LLM prompt.
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Open journal systems (OJS) selected as infrastructure to underpin Open Research Europe publishing platform
dlvr.it/TDtQqw
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
If you aren't using AI, you'll get left behind in 2024.
Here're the 7 best AI tools for YouTubers and video creators:
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
I don't understand why people don't use AI on their phones.
Because it allows you to be much more productive.
Here are 9 ways to use AI on your phone (FREE) 🧵↓
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
The best websites to read and/or download free books.
Save them or you will regret it.
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
AI is coming for your job.
But this is an opportunity to finally start the side hustle you’ve always wanted.
AI will bring both problems and opportunity.
It’s up to you to decide which you’ll focus on.
How will you react?
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
"Is ChatGPT making scientists hyper-productive? The highs and lows of using AI" | @Nature | @meprillaman | buff.ly/3UY7g2x
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Google just Updated Labs, and it's impressive.
Create High Quality AI Images on Google Page for FREE.
Here's how to do this in 3 steps 🧵👇
Save For Later🔖
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Five AI Research Tools That Referencing Genuine Sources
library.hkust.edu.hk/sc/ai-t…
Hallucinations are a significant concern surrounding the use of AI. In our recent post on Research Bridge, we introduce five AI tools that generate research answers based on real papers.
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Former #OpenAccess EU representative at @cOAlitionS_OA not able to distinguish Gold OA from OA, not able to support or mention Green OA and repositories confirms to me what #Plan_S is all about #OSFair2023. The plan of Research Industry.
Why nobody is talking about establishing publicly funded free-to-publish and free-to-read open access? Everyone seems to be defending scholarly trade.
All pay and publish should be considered "predatory publishing" in my opinion.
sciencebusiness.net/viewpoin…
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Recently we posted (see xitter.cf/fake_journals/st…) the top ten researchers who had published on #PredatoryPublishing.
The top researcher had published 25 articles (the second placed article had published 11 articles).
Here are the 25 articles, in case you are interested.
#1: Bibliometric analysis of a controversial paper on predatory publishing (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-03-20…
#2: Non-compliance with ethical rules caused by misuse of ORCID accounts: Implications for medical publications in the COVID-19 era (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2…
#3: Should anonymous and pseudonymous entities be cited or acknowledged? (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnur…
#4: Preprints: Ethical hazard or academic liberation? (2017) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.17646/KOME.201…
#5: Why blacklists are not reliable: A theoretical framework (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#6: Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach (2020) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#7: Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness (2022) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1409
#8: A measure to quantify predatory publishing is urgently needed (2023) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.…
#9: The ICMJE recommendations: challenges in fortifying publishing integrity (2020) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-02…
#10: Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics (2016) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12024-01…
#11: Is the Continued Claim of Indexing in Publons by Journals a Predatory Publishing Characteristic? (2023) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradio…
#12: A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing (2022) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-02…
#13: Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#14: Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing (2022) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.…
#15: The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-02…
#16: A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-02…
#17: How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications (2019) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1108/JICES-06-…
#18: An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2022) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#19: Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#20: Conflicts of interest arising from simultaneous service by editors of competing journals or publishers (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.3390/publicati…
#21: What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#22: Rethinking the use of the term ‘global south’ in academic publishing (2021) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.3897/ese.2021.…
#23: Reproducibility issues with correlating Beall-listed publications and research awards at a small Canadian business school (2020) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-02…
#24: An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues (2020) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.…
#25: Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature (2022) Access to article: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-02…
Top 10 (well 12, due to the number of papers published being equal) researchers, who have published papers on #PredatoryPublishing.
1⃣ Teixeira da Silva, J.A. 25
2⃣ Beall, J. 11
2⃣ Undefined 11
4⃣ Tsigaris, P. 9
5⃣ Moher, D. 7
6⃣ Dadkhah, M. 6
6⃣ Memon, A.R. 6
8⃣ Cobey, K.D. 5
8⃣ Cortegiani, A. 5
8⃣ Lalu, M.M. 5
8⃣ Manca, A. 5
8⃣ Oermann, M.H. 5
@Scopus search term = 'TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Predatory Publish*" )'
Sukhdev Singh retweeted
Chandrayaan-3 Mission:
🇮🇳Vikram soft-landed on 🌖, again!
Vikram Lander exceeded its mission objectives. It successfully underwent a hop experiment.
On command, it fired the engines, elevated itself by about 40 cm as expected and landed safely at a distance of 30 – 40 cm away.
Importance?: This 'kick-start' enthuses future sample return and human missions!
All systems performed nominally and are healthy. Deployed Ramp, ChaSTE and ILSA were folded back and redeployed successfully after the experiment.
#Chandrayaan_3
#Ch3