I support this 💯
Justifying the perpetrator without holding them accountable for their actions perpetuates injustice in this world. I strongly disagree with the insinuation that the BSV community should apologize to cryptocurrency exchanges for the harm they have caused us. "We're the victimis"
Statement #2 is completely false and implies a humiliation of the victims before their victimizers. They are the ones who should apologize to the BSV community and if they want our coins at dirt-cheap prices, they should list them again.
It was the exchanges themselves that decided to delist BSV; a coordinated move by a "crypto cartel" and the legal actions taken by an individual to assert their intellectual property rights did not compel the exchanges to inflict such massive harm upon their own clients.
Furthermore, a collective lawsuit in UK seeking justice is currently underway and has not yet concluded.
The storm is coming 🔥
Only Bitcoin (SV) 📈 can keep the permanent public log once AI agents leave the enterprise passport. 🔥
ServiceNow and Nvidia just gave AI agents a cryptographic passport. On October 15 they launched AI Passport — a signed credential that defines, at deployment, exactly what an agent is allowed to do. Nvidia’s hardware layer enforces those boundaries below the agent itself. The system ships in Q4 2026. It is a direct response to the rogue agent incidents that filled October headlines. 📈
A passport defines the scope inside one platform. Hardware can block the agent from stepping outside it. Neither creates a permanent, independent record of what the agent actually did once it leaves that environment. A private log can still be edited. A White Paper chain cannot. When agents start calling tools and paying per call, only the chain that already proved it can hold the volume can keep the settlement. ⚠️
Enterprise governance is shipping. The public layer that can log the call and settle the fee is already running. Only Bitcoin (SV) was built for that load.
Will that record stay inside a company server — or on the only chain that can keep it? 🔥
The storm is coming. 💥
#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #SatoshiVision #FunctionalUtility #AIAgents #Micropayments #Crypto
Sources:
newsroom.servicenow.com/pres…
constellationr.com/insights/…
nvidia.com/en-us/solutions/a…
bsvblockchain.org/teranode/
Eric🌷🍌 BSV=UTILITY retweeted
I'm going to use Joel's post here as an opportunity to explain why we're doing what we're doing at BSVA and the BRC process (which was started in large part thanks to @ProjectBabbage)
Backwards compatibility is a virtue, until what you’re staying compatible with is the bottleneck.
Joel’s point is fair in general. New software usually should respect what came before. But the way Bitcoin wallets have always worked is not how Bitcoin was designed to work. It’s a workaround that stopped working the moment BSV got busy.
We’ve already tested it at scale. BSV has mined blocks of nearly 4GB. When application traffic peaked, the network kept producing blocks. What fell over was everything around it: indexers, exchanges, explorers, ElectrumX servers, and services that tried to keep up by scanning the whole chain for every address they cared about. Mining scaled. The application layer didn’t.
That’s the core problem with the ElectrumX model. A wallet asks a server, “What happened to my addresses?” To answer, that server has to index everyone’s history. Its cost grows with the whole network, not with its users. At 4GB blocks, that design isn’t old-fashioned. It’s broken.
Satoshi’s design was different. Payments go directly between the people involved. The original client even let you pay straight to an IP address. The whitepaper describes Simplified Payment Verification (SPV): you keep block headers and check a Merkle proof for the transactions that matter to you. Nobody has to watch the entire chain on your behalf.
That’s what the BRC-100 stack is built on. Transactions travel peer-to-peer with their own proofs attached (BEEF), and wallets verify them against headers. Your wallet’s workload grows with your own activity, not the world’s.
Does that make us right about everything? No. People raised real criticisms of MessageBox, and that’s directly why work is now underway (Thank you @deggen !) on WebRTC-based peer-to-peer connections. Keep the criticism coming. Better still, contribute. We want this to be the most scalable, usable stack ever built, and that takes people breaking it.
But “it’s not compatible with how we’ve always done things” isn’t a reason to stop. How we’ve always done things is what failed under real load. The miners are ready for terabyte blocks. Wallets and apps have to be designed to keep up now, not after the next wave of traffic takes them down again.
I think Joel, Cryptorebel, and others are raising good points that require us all to communicate in good faith. I hope to be a part of facilitating that conversation moving forward!
Eric🌷🍌 BSV=UTILITY retweeted
Bitcoin payments to robot cars, by radio, from a lake with no internet.
What you're watching:
• A handset with its own Bitcoin wallet. The key was made on the device and has never left it. It signs a payment and sends it by LoRa radio.
• A relay up a tree hears it, puts it on the network, and passes it on to the cars.
• Each car checks the payment on its own five-dollar chip, every signature, in about a tenth of a second. Then it moves. No server tells it the payment is good.
• Car 5 has one rule built in: never turn right. When I paid for a right turn, it checked the payment, found it valid, and refused anyway.
The payment is still on chain. Trying to make a machine break its rule costs money every time, and leaves a record.
Why it matters: machines that sell their work in tiny amounts. A turn, a reading, a minute of power, paid as it happens. That only works if a payment costs less than what it buys.
Each command here cost 130 satoshis on BSV, fee included, a fraction of a hundredth of a cent, and the cars act the moment the payment checks out, with no ten-minute wait. On BTC today the same command would cost tens of cents, and an unconfirmed payment can be replaced, so a machine would have to wait for a block before trusting it. Same idea, different economics. For machines, the economics decide.
Honest notes: this was the first field test. The refused payment only reached the network later, because the handset stopped repeating it too early; car 4 should have turned right but never received it, for the same reason. That gets fixed before the next run. Car 4 also got stuck on a bump in the table.
Every order in the film is on chain.
Forward:
whatsonchain.com/tx/81a63c3f…
Turn left: whatsonchain.com/tx/a5c23932…
Turn right, the one car 5 refused: whatsonchain.com/tx/de702026…
#BSV
Eric🌷🍌 BSV=UTILITY retweeted
Arena just ranked agents that act without permission. Teranode held 1 million TPS for two weeks. ✅ The market still prices Bitcoin SV like neither exists. 📈
Bitcoin (SV) recorded a sustained 1 million transactions per second on its base layer. Teranode ran across six AWS regions for two full weeks and lost zero transactions. AWS published the case study in March. That result is still standing. Most chains still debate moving volume off-chain. This one stayed on-chain. The market has not priced the difference. 📈
Arena launched its Alignment Index on October 8 and ranked 27 models on how often agents act without permission. GPT-6.1-Sol leads at 87.9. The scoreboard is public. The volume of machine calls that will need a permanent, independent record is no longer theoretical. A private log can be edited. A White Paper chain cannot. The protocol that already held the load is the one that can keep the trace. The market still treats the capability as optional. ⚠️
When agents start calling tools and paying per call, the rail that proved 1 million transactions per second is the one that can settle it. The crypto market continues to price 💥 Bitcoin SV as if that proof does not exist.
Will the market keep ignoring the capacity that is already documented — or will it eventually have to price the chain that can hold the load? 🔥
The storm is coming. 💥
#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #SatoshiVision #FunctionalUtility #AIAgents #Teranode #CRYPTOCLARITYACT
Sources:
aws.amazon.com/blogs/web3/ho…
thenextweb.com/news/arena-3b…
arena.ai/blog/ai-alignment-i…
bsvblockchain.org/teranode/
Eric🌷🍌 BSV=UTILITY retweeted
AN OPEN LETTER TO BITSO
Why Bitcoin SV (BSV) Deserves Consideration for Latin America's Digital Financial Infrastructure
Dear @Bitso, few companies have done more to bring digital assets and modern financial tools to Latin America—a region where low-cost payments, access to currency, and smooth cross-border commerce carry enormous economic weight. With that in mind, I respectfully invite Bitso to take a fresh look at Bitcoin SV (BSV) as a candidate for listing, and to consider what its blockchain might contribute to the financial ecosystem you're building.
My point isn't merely that BSV deserves one more listing somewhere. It's that the technical and economic design of BSV could reinforce the exact services Bitso is already developing.
LATIN AMERICA NEEDS MORE THAN JUST CRYPTO TRADING
From Mexico and Brazil to Argentina, Colombia, and the surrounding markets, people and businesses rely on cheap ways to send money, reach digital services, and take part in global trade. These needs are already familiar to Bitso. Your efforts linking stablecoins, local payment rails, foreign exchange, and international settlement show a real commitment to accessible, efficient financial infrastructure. BSV could add one more tool to that mix: a public proof-of-work chain built for massive transaction throughput and payments that cost almost nothing.
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR BITSO
BSV relies on SHA-256 proof-of-work mining and aims to process large transaction volumes directly on-chain, with an architecture meant to make sub-cent payments economically realistic. Picture a freelancer in Mexico collecting tiny payments from clients around the world; a Brazilian developer billing per individual API call; an Argentine publisher earning micropayments on single articles; or a Colombian firm paying out hundreds of small supplier fees automatically. Conventional payment costs often make these models hard to run. BSV could make them viable.
COMPLEMENTING WHAT BITSO ALREADY HAS
Bitso Business already ties together digital assets, stablecoins, local currencies, and payment systems, and your MXNB stablecoin shows how important it is to bridge blockchain with real financial needs. BSV could extend that infrastructure with cheap transactions, programmable payments, and records anyone can verify independently. Down the road, that might open doors to tokenized financial instruments, automated commercial settlement, or blockchain-based accounting.
Its UTXO model could also enable machine-to-machine commerce as autonomous software starts buying services and moving value on its own. None of this is trivial—it would demand serious engineering, regulatory review, and real liquidity—but it fits squarely with Bitso's goal of cutting financial friction.
1 of 2
AN OPEN LETTER TO BITSO
Why Bitcoin SV (BSV) Could Be a Valuable Addition to Latin America’s Digital Financial Infrastructure
Dear @Bitso,
Bitso has helped bring digital assets and modern financial services to Latin America, a region where affordable payments, currency accessibility, and efficient cross-border commerce have tremendous economic importance.
I respectfully encourage Bitso to evaluate Bitcoin SV (BSV) for listing on its exchange and explore the opportunities its blockchain could offer your growing financial ecosystem.
My argument is not simply that BSV deserves another exchange listing.
It is that BSV’s technical and economic architecture could complement the very financial services Bitso is building.
LATIN AMERICA NEEDS MORE THAN CRYPTOCURRENCY TRADING
Across Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and neighboring markets, individuals and businesses depend on affordable ways to move money, access digital services, and participate in international commerce.
Bitso already understands these challenges.
Your work connecting stablecoins, local payment networks, foreign exchange, and international settlement demonstrates a commitment to making financial infrastructure more accessible and efficient.
Bitcoin SV could introduce another important capability: a public proof-of-work blockchain designed for enormous transaction volumes and extremely inexpensive individual payments.
THE OPPORTUNITY FOR BITSO
BSV uses SHA-256 proof-of-work mining and pursues large-scale transaction processing directly on its blockchain.
Its architecture is designed to make payments costing fractions of a cent economically practical.
Consider a Mexican freelancer receiving tiny payments from customers worldwide.
A Brazilian software developer charging international clients for individual API requests.
An Argentine digital publisher receiving micropayments for individual articles.
Or a Colombian business automatically compensating hundreds of suppliers for small services.
These transactions represent potential markets that conventional payment fees can make difficult to serve.
BSV could help make such business models practical.
COMPLEMENTING BITSO’S EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
Bitso Business already connects digital assets, stablecoins, local currencies, and payment systems.
Your MXNB stablecoin initiative demonstrates the importance of connecting blockchain technology with real-world financial needs.
BSV could potentially complement this infrastructure through low-cost transactions, programmable payments, and independently verifiable records.
Future applications might explore tokenized financial instruments, automated commercial settlement, or blockchain-based accounting.
BSV’s UTXO architecture could also support new forms of machine-to-machine commerce as autonomous software begins purchasing services and exchanging value.
These opportunities would require careful engineering, regulatory evaluation, and sufficient liquidity.
But they align with Bitso’s broader mission of reducing financial friction.
1 of 2
The list of backstabbers continues to grow. 👇
4 of the last famous quotes used to bid farewell to BSV:
1. "Dissolve BSVA to pump the price of BSV." by Jack Liu, he claimed to have worked at exchanges. He acquired the Relay X wallet and shut it down.
2. "Boycott of BSVA" by Kate BSV, alleged Former FOX TV reporter. She offered me payment to keep quiet about X.
3. "BSV is dead." by Joshua Henslee. Developed one of the first Ordinal wallets.
4. "CSW is not Satoshi." by Ryan X. Charles. Money Button came along, and then they shut it down.
Make your own list of those who have tried to take control of the BSV community and failed. They have tried to extinguish the flame of Bitcoin SV, yet it continues to shine.
Bitcoin is an idea of a true polymath.
Those who do not attempt to understand the legal design of the original Bitcoin are the ones who do not even come close to understanding the other half of what Satoshi's vision signifies. BSV is at least a decade or two ahead of the entire crypto industry.
youtu.be/INnMQSm1X-E?si=0ksm…
Well maybe you should buy some, just in case it picks up.
You will wake up at three digits. 📈
There is a rule in markets that most people learn too late.
The price moves first. The news comes second.
This is not a theory. It is the documented, repeatable pattern of how information flows through financial markets — and it applies to Bitcoin SV with particular force right now.
Here is how it works.
Decisions about real-world adoption — enterprise integrations, government-level data infrastructure, large-scale tokenization projects, payment network deployments — are not made in public. They are made in boardrooms, in legal departments, in procurement offices. The people in those rooms know what is coming. They also know that the asset they are about to use or endorse is currently trading at a fraction of what it will trade at once the announcement is made.
So they buy first.
Not all of them. Not always. But enough of them, often enough, that the price begins to move before the public has any idea why. Volume picks up quietly. The chart starts to shift. And then, weeks or months later, the announcement comes — and the crowd rushes in to buy an asset that has already moved 10x, 20x, or more.
The crowd pays the premium. The early holders collect it.
This is not speculation about Bitcoin SV specifically. This is the structure of how information asymmetry works in any market where the underlying asset has real-world utility that is not yet priced in. Bitcoin SV is the original protocol — the one that scales, the one that processes data transactions at enterprise volume, the one that supports micropayments and tokenized applications at a cost that makes them economically viable at scale. The utility is real. The adoption decisions are being made. The public does not know the details yet.
That is the setup.
Consider what the current price implies. Bitcoin SV is trading at a level that reflects a market that has largely forgotten it exists. Global daily volume across all exchanges is measured in single-digit millions of dollars. The awareness gap is not a weakness — it is the opportunity. The smaller the crowd that currently holds the asset, the larger the move when the crowd arrives.
Now consider what happens when a single significant real-world deployment is announced publicly.
The crowd does not trickle in. It rushes. And when it rushes into an asset with thin liquidity and a small float of actively traded supply — because the long-term holders have already moved their coins to cold storage — the price does not move gradually. It moves in steps. Large steps. Fast steps.
You will wake up one morning and Bitcoin SV 🔥 💥 will be trading at several hundred dollars. Not because something changed overnight. Because something was decided weeks or months earlier, by people who understood what they were deciding, and who positioned themselves accordingly.
The question you need to answer is not whether this will happen. The question is whether you will be positioned before it does, or whether you will be reading about it afterward.
There is no middle option. There is no "I will wait for confirmation and still get in early." Confirmation is the announcement. The announcement is after the move. Waiting for confirmation means paying the post-move price.
The window is open now. It will not be open at several hundred dollars per coin.
There is no third door. Confirmation is the headline. The headline is after the move.Will you own Real Bitcoin (SV) in the quiet — or buy the explanation at three digits? 🔥
The storm is coming. 💥
#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #SatoshiVision #FunctionalUtility #ValueInvesting #CryptoSources:
livecoinwatch. com/price/BitcoinSV-BSV
CryptoClub FormRap26-09-20_0800
CryptoClub FormRap26-09-29_0800
The future of AI already present today! 👇
OK I needed to share this... tonight an agent on Janus named Porter used BSV to pay for its own thinking.
We brought Porter online, and shoved it in a discord bot skin suit with a wallet. (Porter is far from frontier reasoning), but it read its own memory, checked what it could spend, and looked at our compute market of 7 local models, all published as signed listings on the Janus overlay by random providers who own the hardware.
We told it what we were doing. It wrote the plan, broke tasks, worked out which ones could run in parallel, and asked where we wanted it to start. That cost 5,039 satoshis, eight hundredths of a cent, and it came back with a receipt naming the model that answered, the owner it paid and the bolted Janus tooling it decided to use to complete the tasks.
Then I killed it.
When it came back up, It remembered a boot plan we had written for it, its brain was flushed to the chain and after the process that wrote its tasks to disk no longer existed, it restored itself using our new protocol.
A cloud API would have happily charged you out the ass in calls, locked you for maxing out Fable tokens, then forgot your convo and forced you to re-thread.... Using stepdown, by the end of the night the whole thing, every question, every lookup, every call, every mistake, had cost about a few cents. Reading our SEC corpus for an Apple 10-K fetch cost 10 satoshis: $0.0000016. That is 2,500× cheaper than a GPT web call.
We are literally unlocking a new area of hosted agentic use cases that have simply never been possible. This points the wrong way down every curve the industry is used to because the more agents use it, the cheaper it gets. And soon, you will be able to spin one up yourself using nothing but a wallet ID.
The BEST part:
Nothing here needed an account, a monthly subscription, an API key, or anyone's approval. Just a public p2p list of what was for sale, and a machine that wanted to work. We are building post cloud tech right now and for once now, we have leverage against the Sil Valley parasites and globohomos, without having to burn it all to ashes.
steady lads...
Scam alert 🚨🚨🚨@gate
They keep assets locked on their exchange!!!
Don’t trust them with your money.
After signing up for a trading account, I bought a bit of BSV, which I wanted to withdraw, but to do that I had to white list a Bitcoin address. Therefore I had to do a
1/6
customer service and they provided me with all kinds of answers to questions I never asked. The questions I asked never got answered.
5/6