I like clarity and reason. I'm math-curious. I love the music on @THCWaves. Co-owner of the Green Bay Packers #GoPackGo

NYC
Joined January 2022
Why should you follow me? Because I'm not just going to like your posts, I'm going to read and like all the best comments from your reply guys; saving you time and emotional labor
60
8
5
344
158,154
Replying to @vimal4USA
You are the perfect example of a Republican
1
42
You're an idiot
2
33
Replying to @NonnegotiableMI
Why don't the Kurds have their own state?
4
The guy who pretends he just became a Republican at least twice a week sure does know a lot about what Republicans like
2
99
Replying to @ModeledBehavior
Elon has said and done things that are genuinely dumb many times. I think there may be evidence that he used to be intelligent, but not anymore
2
20
Just being proactive so if Whelan got hurt we would have already vetted his potential replacements
3
157
I'm going to take a shot at genuinely communicating with you because you seem like a real person. Real ID can not require the exact same documents as the SAVE Act because if it did, a real ID would be sufficient for the SAVE Act and it is not. A Real ID does not show you are a citizen. Regardless, even if we stipulated that the burden for these documents is the same, the people who are affected are not. Many people rarely or never fly, but Americans have a right to vote. Making it harder for me to fly is annoying, but making it harder for me to vote requires much stronger justification. This last part is the most important part: The SAVE Act is NOT a regular voter ID law. Requiring people to have ID to vote or request a ballot is something we can discuss and we may be able to agree on. The SAVE Act is much more insidious. The reason people oppose the SAVE Act is NOT because of voter ID. It is because the SAVE Act requires states to send the federal government their voter registration lists so that the DHS can flag people on this list for removal. This would happen by running the lists through the SAVE database which has already been shown to produce false positives. You do not need a strong imagination to see how this could be abused by a corrupt administration. A corrupt administration could use voter data to selectively purge legitimate voters from the registration rolls close to the election and tip close elections in their favor
6
Replying to @KenGardner11
This headline is a lie. In that interview she called the idea she was married to her brother crazy and answered, "not to my knowledge" to the follow up question of whether she was related to him at all
3
30
Replying to @cnelsonnation
You must be a Republican the way you side with the child molesters
5
54
Replying to @SarahLongwell25
Still too much approval
4
40
Replying to @mrddmia
You nailed it. Who do these Democrats think they reacting defensively to the insane things Trump says every day?
3
19
Replying to @NFLFrascella
All of that and Tucker Kraft is better than him anyway
1
132
Replying to @ArmandDoma
Where would we be right now if there were no fillibuster these past two years?
1
6
649
No need to be that way. It's an awkward sentence
1
2
35
That's a different Joe Walsh
1
2
26
How many people you think can do that?
1
8
No he would not be "charged already" because he settled the election fraud case and as long as Trump's Republican party is in power crime will be legal whenever it benefits them
2
12