I like clarity and reason. I'm math-curious. I love the music on @THCWaves. Co-owner of the Green Bay Packers #GoPackGo

NYC
Joined January 2022
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @atrupar
By all accounts, Amy Acton was separated from her mother when she was 12 years old, so when her mother calls her a liar she is talking about a child. This is what Trump's Republican party of sadistic frauds and perverts is running on
13
You are a f*cking moron. Winning the popular vote means getting more votes than the other candidates. The word for that is a plurality. A majority of Americans who voted in 2024 did not vote for Trump
1
8
Replying to @Informalib @NBCNews
@grok did Russia try to help Trump and hurt Clinton in 2016? What did the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, the Mueller Report, and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee review all conclude about Russian interference?
1
3
19
@grok Please tell an easily understood and realistic story about how an unethical admin from either party could use the SAVE Act and SAVE database to prevent the other party from winning elections
1
6
You're just saying you can't and then posting a screenshot of ways that it could be abused. You're wrong that all administrations are equally corrupt. It's unbelievable you think we should trust Trump, but you ought to at least think about how it could be used against you
2
Replying to @PiquantParvenu
Here is what the Russian innovation you love so much has accomplished. They found new ways to kill and mutilate children. You are incredibly sick. You ought to pray that no evil befalls you like the evil you admire from Russia
2
1
10
That means he had more votes than the other candidates. That doesn't mean a majority voted for him and it sure as hell doesn't mean he "won in a historic landslide"
51
You do not need to be a citizen to get a real ID, and again, the SAVE Act is not a regular voter ID law. We are not against the SAVE Act because people would need an ID to vote. We are against the SAVE Act because a corrupt administration could use it to steal an election
2
10
Replying to @jamesfishback
Trump did not win in 2024 in a historic landslide. I stopped listening as soon as you said that bullshit. A majority of Americans who voted in 2024 didn't vote for Trump
1
6
752
Replying to @vimal4USA
You are the perfect example of a Republican
8
150
You're an idiot
4
52
Replying to @NonnegotiableMI
Why don't the Kurds have their own state?
11
The guy who pretends he just became a Republican at least twice a week sure does know a lot about what Republicans like
3
223
Replying to @ModeledBehavior
Elon has said and done things that are genuinely dumb many times. I think there may be evidence that he used to be intelligent, but not anymore
2
21
Just being proactive so if Whelan got hurt we would have already vetted his potential replacements
3
183
I'm going to take a shot at genuinely communicating with you because you seem like a real person. Real ID can not require the exact same documents as the SAVE Act because if it did, a real ID would be sufficient for the SAVE Act and it is not. A Real ID does not show you are a citizen. Regardless, even if we stipulated that the burden for these documents is the same, the people who are affected are not. Many people rarely or never fly, but Americans have a right to vote. Making it harder for me to fly is annoying, but making it harder for me to vote requires much stronger justification. This last part is the most important part: The SAVE Act is NOT a regular voter ID law. Requiring people to have ID to vote or request a ballot is something we can discuss and we may be able to agree on. The SAVE Act is much more insidious. The reason people oppose the SAVE Act is NOT because of voter ID. It is because the SAVE Act requires states to send the federal government their voter registration lists so that the DHS can flag people on this list for removal. This would happen by running the lists through the SAVE database which has already been shown to produce false positives. You do not need a strong imagination to see how this could be abused by a corrupt administration. A corrupt administration could use voter data to selectively purge legitimate voters from the registration rolls close to the election and tip close elections in their favor
2
10
Replying to @KenGardner11
This headline is a lie. In that interview she called the idea she was married to her brother crazy and answered, "not to my knowledge" to the follow up question of whether she was related to him at all
3
30
Replying to @cnelsonnation
You must be a Republican the way you side with the child molesters
5
54
Replying to @SarahLongwell25
Still too much approval
4
41