Douglas Beall retweeted
Replying to @northwoods1980
This is probably fine. The real problem is not calling it a fracture at all and just saying, “wedging” or “impaction”. Then, our patients never make it any sort of medical or invasive intervention.
@dougbeall
Douglas Beall retweeted
Republicans are working real hard to appear completely incompetent and lose the midterms.
Dustin here is thanking the federal government for cutting physician payments without explaining which work duplicates another service or why that justifies a 50% cut.
Apparently, “trust the government” is the republican position now.
Medicare already includes routine evaluation in its payment for a minor procedure.
A physician cannot legitimately bill a separate office visit just for deciding to remove a mole.
To bill separately, the physician must perform significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management beyond the work the procedure payment already covers.
CMS now proposes to pay the highest-valued applicable service in full and cut the other applicable services by 50% when the physician performs them on the same day.
The agency argues that the payment valuations overlap. Then CMS needs to identify the duplicated resources and justify the size of the reduction.
Repeating “unnecessary spending” doesn’t do that work.
I oppose cutting payment for distinct, necessary services simply because a physician delivers them during one visit.
If CMS can demonstrate overlapping costs, fix those specific valuations.
Otherwise, consider the incentive you’re applauding.
A physician evaluates a patient, performs additional work that qualifies for separate payment, and safely completes a necessary procedure that day.
Under this proposal, Medicare cuts the lower-valued service in half.
Schedule that separately billable care on different days, and the same-day reduction no longer applies.
Why create a financial reason to make Grandma come back?
She needs another ride. Her daughter misses more work. The practice uses another appointment slot.
The family gets to rearrange its fucking life so Washington can congratulate itself on efficiency.
And Medicare already gives practices another reason to move away from inexpensive office care: the hospital payment premium.
MedPAC’s 2024 skin-lesion example put total payment at $165 in a physician’s office and $404 in a hospital outpatient department.
More than twice as much for the same service category.
If patients can safely receive that care in a physician’s office, explain why taxpayers need to pay the hospital premium.
Then explain Washington’s treatment of physician-owned hospitals.
Section 6001 of Obamacare effectively banned new physician-owned hospitals and restricted existing ones from expanding. Congress protected incumbent hospitals from new competitors and additional capacity.
Where do you stand on repealing that, Dustin?
Do you think restricting supply and protecting incumbents drives prices down? Walk us through that one.
I want physicians to compete for patients on price, quality, and convenience. Let them build hospitals. Let them expand. Pay them fairly when they perform necessary care safely in an office and save a patient another trip.
Your post celebrates squeezing physician payments without addressing the rules that reward expensive settings and block competition.
Call ten independent practices before your next victory lap. Ask what keeps them from treating more patients at lower cost.
Then help remove those barriers.
Republicans could run on making healthcare cheaper through competition.
Instead, you and other naive and stupid republicans are selling another government payment cut as a breakthrough.
Taxpayers shouldn’t pay twice for overlapping work.
CMS has proposed reducing Medicare payments for overlapping services billed during the same visit.
Thank you, @DrOzCMS for tackling unnecessary spending. This administration is doing a great job at cutting down on costs.
Douglas Beall retweeted
I’ve invested in a significant number of healthcare startups.
Here is the good news.
The next healthcare entrepreneur has a wonderfully low bar for surprising people.
Answer the phone.
Offer an appointment.
Tell the patient what it costs.
Send a bill that matches.
Doing those things consistently takes real work.
Imagine building a reputation because people describe an encounter with your business as, “Exactly what they told me would happen.”
I’d invest in that.
Douglas Beall retweeted
𝐂𝐌𝐒 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐨 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐀𝐜𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐲: 𝐩𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐫-𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬-𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤.
Starting November 1, federal IDR batches may contain no more than 50 disputed line items.
For new batches, physicians must wait through a 30-business-day cooling-off period.
Then they get four business days to file.
CMS will automatically block anything filed too early or too late.
𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐩𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬:
More batches.
More fees.
More administrative work.
More opportunities to lose payment rights because someone miscalculated a date.
CMS can automatically reject a physician’s late filing.
When an insurer refuses to pay a binding IDR award, the physician may have to ask the government to enforce it.
The government built a hard deadline for physicians.
Insurers still get the honor system.
@DrBruggeman @EdGainesIII
Douglas Beall retweeted
We need to have a conversation about how uneven the changes have been to physician payments.
Everyone agrees… primary care needs to be paid more. Haven’t heard anyone debate that.
But how our government has decided to get that money has been a crime. It has consistently unequally hurt private, independent physicians over employed physicians and is ironically increasing the cost of care while trying to decrease the cost of care.
Here are the receipts:
1) 25 modifier changes (proposed)
As notated below, over 80% of the impact is on independent physicians
2) Conversion factor failing to keep up with inflation
Employed doctors aren’t paid through the conversion factor while private practice doctors are. Lowering conversion factors only hurts independents.
3) modifying the Indirect Practice Expense Cost Index (proposed)
Employed doctors aren’t paid through practice expense RVUs. Any modification here will only hurt independent doctors
4) indirect practice expense 50% reduction (implemented last year)
Same as (3) above
This is before we talk about lack of movement on physician ownership of hospitals, unfair 340B policies, continuation of ambivalence towards site neutrality, and imbalanced stark laws that penalize doctors while allowing hospitals to engage in the same behavior.
I don’t think the administration is trying to hurt private doctors intentionally. I just don’t think that there is an understanding of how private doctors are paid vs employed physicians and the long term implications of unequally harming private practice (with the ultimate end game of mass consolidation)
beckersasc.com/asc-accredita…
Douglas Beall retweeted
Will be interesting to see what this turns up and where it goes. BCBS has always stated that it doesn’t deny care, it just declines to pay for the care.
Join us for SI Joint fusion training covering all three common approaches. Training will be held on February 6, 2027 in Tempe, Arizona. The registration link and additional details are included here:
form.jotform.com/26231649766…
Douglas Beall retweeted
ADMIN: “We worry that owning a hospital gives you a financial interest in your patients’ care.”
Physician: “So you want to hire me?”
ADMIN: “Yes.”
Physician: “And your hospital will earn money from my work?”
ADMIN: “Yes.”
Physician: “Who worries about that financial interest?”
ADMIN: “Your orientation starts Monday.”
Come out to the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco April 1-3 to join us for the 2nd annual World Institute of Regenerative Medicine Congress. It sure to be exciting and cutting edge!
youtu.be/8oHDvHL0_Dc?feature…
Douglas Beall retweeted
This article highlights the problem that no one is talking about. Every legislator and regulator in DC wants to discuss the problems getting into a primary care doctor. They couch it as a problem within our payment system that everyone wants to be a specialist because (implied) everyone who enters medicine does so to make the most money possible and specialists tend to make more money.
Dr Pelzman outlines the real problem… specialists are just as difficult to find as primary care doctors. Even with an “inside track” as a physician in a captured system, Dr Pelzman couldn’t even get an appointment for his patient.
Policies like cutting payment by 25% for total joint replacement, paying 50% for the -25 modifier (which lets your orthopedic surgeon inject your knee the day you see them instead of waiting another several months for the follow up), and penalizing physicians who provide services at facilities, all contribute to the specialist shortage.
We have to stop the bleeding and focus on the real problems in healthcare while engaging physicians in finding those solutions
medpagetoday.com/opinion/pat…
Douglas Beall retweeted
To support our expanding initiatives and our upcoming World Congresses, we are proud to introduce our newly appointed Executive Board, who will be driving the daily operations and global mission of WIRM.
#WIRM
@Anavani1Anavani
@dougbeall
Douglas Beall retweeted
It’s still shocking to me Obamacare did this to medcine. Look at what it has led to. The tail wags the dog now. Hospitals employ physicians instead of physicians running the hospitals. The ramifications were proven deadly especially during Covid. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_72…
Douglas Beall retweeted
I’m at the airport. Of course I start reading weekend edition of the @WSJ.
Wouldn’t you know it, the dual designated non-profit grifter, NYU Langone, has a full page ad.
And you’re still wondering why healthcare is expensive?
And you know that means taxpayers are buying WSJ ads for NYU Langone.
Taxpayers subsidize its land.
Taxpayers subsidize its buildings.
Taxpayers subsidize its debt.
Taxpayers subsidize its expansion.
What did it cost? The Wall Street Journal rate card prices a national full-page color advertisement at more than $300,000 (52 weeks).
For one page.
This is the same “nonprofit” hospital system that advertised on a Super Bowl commercial.
Its hospital enterprise reports nearly $10 billion in property, plant, and equipment. It has more than 6,000 physicians.
It operates more than 330 outpatient locations. It buys hospitals. It buys orthopedic groups. It buys physician practices.
It buys land.
It buys advertising.
It buys the commercially insured patients every independent physician needs to survive.
Then it calls itself a charity.
How many taxpaying neurosurgery practices were destroyed while NYU Langone built this empire?
How many physicians were forced to sell?
How many became employees of the institution they once competed against?
How many independent practices had their referrals siphoned away, their patients captured, and their businesses slowly suffocated by a competitor taxpayers were forced to subsidize?
Nobody knows. Nobody counts the bodies. An independent practice dies quietly.
First, referrals disappear.
Then revenue collapses.
Then employees are fired.
Then the physician sells.
Then the hospital raises the price, adds a facility fee, and hangs its logo over the corpse.
The independent physician paid income taxes, property taxes, payroll taxes, commercial rent, malpractice premiums, and the full cost of building a practice.
NYU Langone took the tax exemption, accumulated billions in assets, swallowed the competition, and bought an advertisement congratulating itself.
Where is the charity?
NYU Langone wants the power of a corporation, the market share of a monopoly, the real estate portfolio of a conglomerate, and the tax treatment of a church.
No.
If you acquire competitors like a corporation, advertise like a corporation, accumulate billions like a corporation, and hunt profitable patients like a corporation, then you can finally do one honest thing like a corporation:
No more subsidies.
Pay your taxes.
83 year-old Caucasian male with 10 out of 10 back pain failed non-surgical management as and is in clear decline with a high rate of mortality in this situation. HUMATA denied Kyphoplasty due to the DEXA scan not showing osteoporosis. Osteoporosis does NOT depend only on DEXA
Douglas Beall retweeted
I’ve not been in the world of hospital administration for a while now and haven’t been in discussions of hospital contracting in a while either, but why is anyone surprised this is happening? This was a collision course bound to happen.
1. Government policies encouraged consolidation (remove physician ownership, don’t investigate mergers/acquisitions, etc…)
2. Insurance companies consistently paid community and small privately held hospitals
3. Insurers were consolidating at a rapid pace (also relatively unchecked)
If you were a small, privately held hospital, how were you supposed to survive? Doctors are still holding on as long as they can and now that we have massive hospital systems and massive insurers, they are being pushed out to employment and consolidation as well.
While we can point fingers at hospitals, we need to recognize this isn’t happening in a vacuum and insurers (and employers) are absolutely part of the problem. They chose to undervalue care in the name of profits while employers continue to just hand money over to the insurers and trust that insurers are doing what is in the best long term interest of the healthcare system. Maybe, just maybe, insurers should consider paying more to independent doctors and try to restore independent practice.
Do we need to break up the monopolies in healthcare (title of a hearing where I testified in the Budget Committee)? Absolutely! Will either side of the aisle really do it? I don’t think so. Instead consumers will (literally) pay the price.
washingtonpost.com/health/20…
Douglas Beall retweeted
I finally went to Buc-ee’s in Melissa, TX.
Wow. The healthy food selection was everywhere.
They’re even selling peptides next to the inflammatory BBQ, hot dogs, corn dogs, fudge and tacos.
And they pay some managers more than Medicare reimburses for primary care.
What a country. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸!
Douglas Beall retweeted
Insurers keep blaming physicians for rising premiums. Twenty-four years of data show the opposite: our payments went down while their profits and premiums soared. How can we reasonably make the assumption that physician pay is driving insurance premiums or overall cost? If anything, cutting pay to doctors is driving consolidation and increasing cost, not the other way around.
And the entire IDR process they love to attack? Roughly 0.02% of total healthcare spending.
Stop the misdirection. Let’s focus on the real drivers of cost in the system.
24 years of data, and the story couldn't be clearer: physician payment is not what's driving your premiums.
Health plans have released their proposed 2027 premiums and, to no one's surprise, they want to raise them dramatically again. The median requested increase on the ACA exchanges is 15% — the second straight year of double-digit hikes. And some increases could be as high as 54%. If it holds, marketplace premiums will have climbed by a third in just two years.
Insurers love to point the finger at physicians and medical providers for rising costs. But here's what 24 years of data actually shows:
· Family health insurance premiums: +282%
· Elevance Health (Anthem) net income: +1,554%
· UnitedHealth Group net income: +1,303%
· Medicare physician payment: DOWN 15.5%
‼️The two largest insurers' share prices grew fourteenfold.
‼️Family premiums nearly tripled.
‼️And physician payment — from both Medicare and commercial plans — went backward.
🔎So what happens when health plans decrease physician pay and add unnecessary hoops for physicians to jump through — the prior authorizations, the denials, the endless administrative burden?
Consolidation.
Independent practices can't absorb falling reimbursement and rising red tape forever. So they sell — to hospitals and, increasingly, to the insurers themselves.
Fewer independent physicians mean less competition, higher prices and patients with fewer choices. The same companies squeezing physician pay are buying up the practices they squeezed.
Pay physicians less. Consolidate medicine. Pay more for healthcare.
Douglas Beall retweeted
Full repeal of Certificate of Need passed the North Carolina Senate 31-17.
It cleared two committees in two days.
Then it crossed to the House.
Referred to Rules on April 28, 2025.
That is the last thing that has happened to it.
466 days ago.
Nobody voted it down.
Nobody had to
Join us Thursday, August 6 at 6PM CST for a webinar on the current advances in future directions of intradiscal therapy.
form.jotform.com/26204484999…
Join us on Saturday, September 26 at the Seattle Science Foundation for American Academy of Interventional Spine and Neuromodulation’s master class in spine and sports interventions
seattlesciencefoundation.org…





















