This is what Primetime was about, btw. The Normie is incapable of reliably discerning between justice and injustice. Moreover, this is not even a distinction that particularly matters to him. He experiences the world only as “content,” and there is good content and bad content. You can see this in ordinary conversation. Ask people what they’re interested in, what they’ve been doing, what they’ve been thinking about, etc. They can only describe themselves in relation to media (content). What “shows” they’re “watching,” what the latest controversy is, etc. Their experience with reality is mediated through content, and eventually reality itself becomes content. (Consider how many manhours are spent every day consuming “irl streamer” content. Consider the implications of there being a significant market for this.) This is how you get the same people — Instagram Reels Americans — who thought le Hollywood was attacking a PEDO CATCHER now finding ways to make the “Cornell 7” story really about themselves (e.g. women posting about “their rapist,” MtM transsexuals posting bloodlust fantasies about what they’d do to the boys). These are also the same people who have been perfectly happy to spend the last year consuming “investigation” content about Charlie Kirk’s assassination, despite the obvious casualties of turning something like that into entertainment: his widow, his friends, his legacy, and the truth. They cannot help themselves. Everything is content. So long as it’s entertaining, brutalizing an approved target, and providing an opportunity to publicly signal virtue, it is Good. The actual people involved are not even remotely considered separately from this. The subject being an approved target (muh abuser, racist, etc.) gives the viewer full permission to enjoy the cruelty while continuing to understand himself as a freaking decent human being. They possess a dangerous combination of sadism, narcissism, and cowardice, which leads them to publicly share these bloodlust fantasies against the approved targets (le abusers, racists, etc.). Everyone always talks (online) about how much better life is offline. Yes, because you don’t have to encounter humanity at-scale. If you do this long enough, you will begin to think that the category of “human” is an offensively egalitarian concept. “People act differently online!” Yeah, I know. They’re more honest.