Dezzi (@dezzifx) profile picture
Joined July 2020
Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)Photo by Dezzi (@dezzifx)
Hello everyone! A couple of weeks ago I was approached by Haider the new owner of the @MyForexFunds brand to rejoin the team to help get things back moving and bring back the old glory of CFD props. Since retiring from prop other than posting about them and doing models and what not, I have had no real intention of rejoining the space and exiting my “retirement”. The industry is extremely messy, especially in CFD’s which is my speciality. My initial reaction was hesitation, so I began grabbing some of the cases and talking to people who were previously involved with MFF as a customer, engaging in both friendly and hostile ways and seeing how people are currently treating the space and whether or not I could be of any assistance. Last weekend Haider made me an official offer, it wasn’t a monetary offer specifically but rather an offer that covers my personal basis for re-entering the space. Haider and I have worked together for a long time, and been through a lot together along with the rest of MFF 1.0. We are now at the point of brother from another mother and I am looking forward to introducing him to the rest of you. As of the 8th October, I am officially joining the new leadership of the @MyForexFunds brand as a senior advisor. My role will be public initially helping to get questions answered and move things forward, improving communication and helping to find the missing pieces that may have fallen through the cracks. After things are complete, I will revert to my advisory position where building and business strategy is the role. In the coming days/weeks you will hear a lot from me. Some of it will be positive, some will be negative but I will work to get all questions answered as timely as I can. I see everyone's comments, many people tag me so I am aware of both the positivity and hostility in the space and the pain points that people have. Sometimes I may get hostile as well. I can't promise you I will be a punching bag and will be as empathetic as I possibly can but I am very much what you see is what you get - theres nothing hidden with me and I wear my heart on my sleeve. A new journey begins and I am excited to show you the work that the team has been putting in to get CFD’s back to the place where they belong. (Theres a lot, way more than before). Waiting for the 12th, then full steam ahead.
90
12
293
12,180
Vest Markets: Sustainable? Not a clue! Good for the Prop Firm space? ABSOLUTELY Every firm is watching this happen, everyone is flooding to the new cool kid, and they are taking notes. This is a prime example of competition. Whether you like them or not, if they stay and keep the rules the same, Prop Firms will be FORCED to adapt to keep a competitive edge. Lots of "IF's", I am pretty skeptical they will stay without adapting.
6
2
74
6,998
Very nearly bought one of the newly launched @MyFundedPerps accounts 👀 At first glance, everything looked pretty much identical to @breakoutprop so I was close to giving them a try. BUT… two pretty HUGE differences have surfaced very quickly 🚨 THE DRAWDOWN IS NOT STATIC This is the biggie for me. After your first payout, the DD moves up to the initial account balance. That completely changes the longevity of an account. I recently joked that my Breakout account had 9 lives because I managed to take 9 payouts from it. With this DD structure? There is absolutely NO WAY that account would have survived. 🤣 2️⃣ SWAP FEES These are being charged every hour while you’re holding a position. For someone like me who likes being able to sit in a crypto trade and let the setup play out, hourly swap fees quietly eating into the profit can make a BIG difference. So although the two offerings might look very similar on the surface… STATIC DD vs DD moving to initial balance after payout + hourly swaps is a massive difference in practice. Definitely glad I spotted these before hitting the buy button. 👀
31
3
1
82
7,666
This is ridiculous! So every time Trump tweets and you profit the money is deducted. If you lose the loss stays. This is for every FundingPips plan by the way! You CAN'T enforce rules against unscheduled events like tweets - it's completely unfair!
Rule change detected - FundingPips Zero: News-trading restrictions now explicitly include Trump speeches and tweets. If you trade Zero accounts, your restricted list just grew. Source in reply. Caught automatically by @capitalcriticai 👇 capitalcritic.ai/updates?x=1
20
11
8
128
44,205
Replying to @KARIIMI1M
Small correction. Not multiple devices. Multiple users on the same device. Multiple devices was never the issue. Use as many as you want. Sharing them with another trader is not allowed, which is in our terms and common knowledge anyway Your account and a second user’s account: same device, same unique identifier, same IPs, again and again. And yes, 12079338 is another account of yours, which was fine, however the other user on your device is not That is account sharing, and when we see it, we act Fun fact: there was no reward to deny. The account was closed before one existed Our policy is public: reach a reward and you get paid, even if we catch something after the request. We blame ourselves, not you Zero reward denials, over $280M paid out
16
2
2
107
97,155
🚨 THE TACO TRADE JUST PLAYED OUT FOR THE FIFTH TIME. And we predicted it yesterday. The 10 year yield was at 4.44% yesterday, 6 basis points away from the level that has forced Trump's hand four times already. We said something big would be announced. It took less than 15 hours. Two announcements came in today. First, Trump paused Project Freedom. Oil dropped from $102 to $99 instantly. Then at 14:30, reports broke that the US and Iran are closing in on a one page memo to end the war. Iran pauses enrichment, accepts UN inspections, and curbs underground nuclear sites. The US eases sanctions and releases frozen assets. Both sides loosen Strait of Hormuz restrictions. Oil crashed from $99 to $93.90 in a single candle. 8% crash in one session. No deal is signed yet, Iran has 48 hours to respond. But the 10 year yield approaching 4.5% has now triggered a major market moving announcement five times in 13 months. Same level, Same playbook, Fifth time.
🚨THE U.S 10-YEAR YIELD IS ABOUT TO HIT THE "INTERVENTION ZONE." US 10 year bond yields are approaching a level where Trump has always intervened with a major announcement. It has happened four times now. In April 2025, tariff fears pushed the 10 year above 4.5%. Trump announced a 90 day tariff pause that same week and personally said the bond market was getting "a little yippy." The moment he announced the pause, yields dropped and stocks exploded higher. In May 2025, yields moved back toward 4.5% again. Trump announced a trade deal framework with China and the same thing happened, yields fell and the market ripped higher immediately after the announcement. In July 2025, the US and China announced a tariff extension deal right as the 10 year touched 4.5% again. Yields dropped and the market rallied on the news. Most recently, In late March 2026, yields pushed back toward this level again and within days a US-Iran ceasefire was announced. Yields dropped and stocks hit new all time highs within the same week. Four times, the same level, and the same outcome every single time. Every time the 10 year approaches 4.5%, something big gets announced and the market moves violently higher. Traders call this the TACO trade. The 10 year is now at 4.4%, and we are just 6 basis points away from the level that has forced Trump's hand four times already.
54
179
14
834
121,515
BREAKING: U.S. officials & Wall Street analysts are now reportedly preparing for the possibility of $200 oil.
1,142
3,661
1,384
19,881
9,036,162
My journey with @AlphaCapitalUK has officially come to an end. Not by choice though. Now, I will not speak ill of a firm that that has paid me $91,608. But as my followers know, I built my brand from the ground up with trust, transparency and full disclosure. And also as a partner and ambassador for @PropFirmMatch, it is my duty and responsibility to also share with you the true events which transpired towards the end of my journey with @AlphaCapitalUK. Those who followed my journey know I made a phenomenal performance of 14 payouts on one single $200k account to achieve the majority of my profits with this firm. @AlphaCapitalUK recognised my performance by inviting me to Alpha Prime. At this point, I was also awaiting a $200K Funded account which took me 2 months to pass. During my Alpha Prime interview, their Head of Client Support formally invited me to Alpha Prime and explained to me what it was. Long story short, it required me to give up $400K Funding ($200K Funded + pending $200K I passed) for a $10K live futures account which only had a 60% profit split. No salary offered. I don't even trade Futures and it didn't seem like a good deal, so I asked what would happen if I declined the offer? I was told that I would be allowed to trade out my $400K Funded account (and another eval I had parked) to finalisation, but I could not purchase any more accounts for a year. I found this fair, so I said I would have to decline the Alpha Prime offer. But after the interview, the conditions changed as the person I spoke with emailed me to say he was misinformed and that I would only be allowed to trade out the remaining $200K Funded account to finalisation. So in essence, they actually denied me the $200K Funding account. I protested that this was unfair and not what was agreed on the call, but to no avail. I then asked if the opportunity and potential to join Alpha Prime would be there upon finalisation of my remaining Funded account, and he said yes, there was that potential. Now, fast forward to a few payouts later, I have finally breached the $200K account. They informed me the offer of Alpha Prime is no longer available without any real assessment. Like I said, I won't speak ill of the firm, but if we are going to be transparent, these are the facts: - @AlphaCapitalUK paid me $91,608 in payouts total - They never denied me a payout unfairly - They gave me the conditions for rejecting Alpha Prime, but went back on the offer later and changed the conditions, under the reasoning that the Head of Client Support I spoke to was misinformed. - They denied me a $200K Funded account (refunded) under the guise of "being invited to Prime" - They did not consider me for Prime when I no longer had any Funded accounts left - To join Prime, I had to give up what I already had. Final Stats with @AlphaCapitalUK: Challenge Fees: $5,396 Payouts: $92,109 (Including Performance Bonus) The above are the facts with what happened. You will not find a single negative statement or opinion from me regarding this situation. You can make up your own mind about what's right and what's wrong. But you need to be informed with what actually happened, and I am here to be transparent and share with you the true side of things. At the end of the day, they paid me $91,608 in payouts and never denied me a payout, but that was also from my own skill as a trader.
56
17
3
330
38,930
It’s about time we just fucking say it. Props aren’t trading. They are a trading themed carnival game designed with a bent rim and a slightly overinflated basketball. So you can’t judge a trader’s skill by their prop trading skills. No real trader does in real trading what they do in props. Prop firms are great though, for new traders and traders who can’t fund themselves yet, people still learning. But also great for people who want to get an ROI on a chunk of money quickly (more on that later). Prop firms are designed on top of risk models that after a certain ROI a trader goes to live. 5x-10x and you’re at that threshold. They all are about the same. Props do not just sit back and let someone 100x their investment. You go live/get denied/soft banned, etc… They have risk teams creating that sweet spot, and setting rules/parameters that set a failure rate that secures solvency. So don’t think for a minute someone pays $300 for an eval and turns it into $1mil payout every Tuesday. Winning the lottery is more likely. Your average prop god will be doing 5x-10x their spend on average. Which means for every million they make they are spending at least $100k. Just accept it already. If you’re shocked a person spent $50k, $100k, $300k, as long as ROI is there that prop god has figured out the system. There is so much “lol I can’t believe you spent this much” or “whoa that payout is awesome how do I join discord” on my feed this week. But it seems so many here went to elementary school in the small portables behind the normal elementary school where their teacher is telling them not to eat glue instead of oh I don’t know… teaching division? So it seems my feed is full of folks that never learned to divide profit by spend to get ROI. If you are making ROI - it doesn’t matter what you bet! The prop game is who is the best and figured out how to cheese the ROI system. Great traders make excellent prop traders. But great prop traders might not be good traders. Let that sink in.
34
12
7
172
72,935
Brian Stonks is a damn scammer thats why he doesn’t show his trades on stream! Good on @ApexTradeFund for outing him because he didn’t run up this balance over 8 days. This kid is a liar he clearly blew accounts and started new ones and showed “consistent” gains. Let’s see his personal account deposits he is probably doing the same shit there and showing fake results just like on these apex accounts. FRAUD 💯 Waiting for that @Wordsofrizdom interview to drop. This clown promoting “verified” traders and giving legitimacy to frauds is a huge problem. 👎
29
6
2
193
28,582
😭🤝😂
62
23
3
537
41,909
The chaos in Futures Props isn't a mystery, it's basic math. Combine unsustainable offers with terrible business management and you have a ticking bomb. In the CFD world, this model survived because they could "play dirty" to fix the mess: widening spreads and forcing slippage to burn winners. In Futures, that safety net is gone. They launched the same reckless promos without the ability to rig execution to save themselves. In CFDs, they cover up their incompetence with backend manipulation. In Futures, they are naked. That's why you see rule changes every week.
2
9
752
Dezzi retweeted
Looks like FT team has some decisions to make. Certainly a red flag for anyone who is still trading there.
18
6
6
150
45,298
Why'd you Trade with properties of a scammer who scammed people off of 300K with a Scam shitcoin? Khaled has a long history of scamming people. He started in Jordan, and moved to Berlin to open is scam academy called Ankhfx where he blew up PAMM account. Previously he scammed a shitcoin named Safetrip Finance. Not going to comment on what he did internally. He is not a decent human being. He opened his Propfirm @fundingpips @fundingticks with people's blood money. He is also behind Prop hedging groups. They are currently hiring a Trustpilot specialist to Fix their shit rating for @fundingticks Sending bot accounts after me now to attack lol. None of it matters. What's true will always be true. Check this out @jmutrades @nuttybartrading @Kellyanntrades @1kpier
. @FundingTicks @Khldfx @avikkfp Rug pulled me for $20,000 This weekend FundingTicks mass emailed and breached traders with an “ip violation” claiming the trading account has been accessed from IP address that match activity with other user’s account. My 2 funded accounts with $10k each in them were breached. I have not traded with a trade copy software I have not traded with a vpn I have not let anyone access my accounts I have only traded from my personal devices This is the case for myself and many others who had their accounts breached. FundingTicks has not made an announcement and neither has any sort of management. To add insult to injury, if you email their support for an appeal they reply with an automated message that their decision is final and do not give any explanation as to why you were banned.
4
4
1
46
16,316
Not that we need further proof, but just in case... @Khldfx has now wiped his X account of any @fundingticks -related content! Please don't give your money to these guys! @fundingpips next?
62
18
7
182
69,215
Topstep is now closing positions and securing profits for traders. How would you feel if your broker closed you out without your authorization? We already have strict daily loss limits on LIVE. Now they want to control the profits too. That is not risk management. That is interfering with execution. If a firm controls your exits, you no longer control your edge.
56
8
8
307
60,777
Haven't posted in a while. Am watching all the drama unfold and felt I would throw a piece of wood on the fire. Lots of "why is this happening" etc. I have said it before, I will repeat it again. This type of prolonged volatility in Gold (where over 60% of all prop firm flow is conservatively), will only lead to disaster. The hard truth is, its not because traders are profitable, its because bad traders can look good in a short time frame when there is volatility. Its an inherent flaw in all the prop models, regardless of the drawdown rules, news rules, stop loss or margin rules. Prolonged volatility leads to increase in number of payouts correlated with an inrease in number of failures, front end revenue might move up a big but the payouts will always move faster at a 15 day lag. The trade then coast traders payout size will increase and if you take a buy only bias, you are more likely to hit the 2nd and 3rd payout. Even at the 3rd payout, you aren't statistically a-bookable as there isn't a big enough sample size, the outfit has to take a punt on you maintaining discipline and continuing to get payouts, 90% of the time its the wrong decision. Its a cashflow problem spurred by volatility. We can argue over whos fault that is its some more of valid argument, but the reasons why is that gold volatility is leading to book damage and the flow especially on gold, is not a-bookable (most of it is random volatility hope trading executing far under market cost, yesterday market spreads were spiking to 40 pips on gold institutionally). Discounts and promos are being used to prop up cashflow industry wide, if you can maintain cashflow at net 0 or utilize reserves slightly you can survive until the volatility stems, but if the volatility continues you are going to see big changes in the industry. If we had a 2009-2020 market, props would thrive and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Funnily enough, brokers are thriving in this market but stunk the place up in the 09-20 market because traders on brokerage accounts are more likely to take the next trade before a withdrawal, go figure. Have a great week everyone, happy trading, trade safe.
6
4
2
45
4,247