川主席他那個女婿簡直了,他在川普第一任期搞的First Step Act的弱智程度我現在都記憶猶新,跟個紐約民主黨野狗一樣。我是真的非常支持民主黨迫害一下庫什納的。他兒子也不是個省油的燈。
我推舉桑德斯主席總統VP AOC,誰贊成誰反對?
BREAKING: Kamala Harris projected to announce another presidential run ahead of 2028 following Democrats' sweeping midterm victories.
60% chance.
🔗 polymarket.com/r/Kamala-28
沒什麼應用場景而已,一款電動皮卡首先便利性受限制,美國的皮卡使用場景是輕型運輸+戶外活動+郊區日常生活,純電動車主要還是城市用車。
马斯克当年豪言年卖25万辆Cybertruck,现实年卖2万辆,“未来汽车”提前退场!
2019年发布时,马斯克把它说成是未来汽车,起售价不到4万美元;现实是价格远超预期,销量只有目标零头。11月6日他亲自宣布,2027年中开始逐步结束Cybertruck在得州工厂的生产,把产能腾给无人驾驶出租车Cybercab。
这已经不是“销量不及预期”了,这是市场直接把一辆被吹上天的明星产品打回原形。
因为自己和政治绑定太深,Cybertruck后来还被玩成了政治符号:有人因为马斯克买它,有人因为马斯克抵制它。车没卖成全民爆款,倒先卖成了政治周边。
从“未来汽车”到“给下一款车腾地方”,只用了几年。
虽然我对商人涉及政治不太喜欢,但从不对科技产品抵触,无论是谁造的。我其实真挺羡慕现在那些拥有Cybertruck的人,我在的地方没上市,不然我也一定是有这款“收藏品”的人。
investing.com/news/stock-mar…
特斯拉美國產能是四分之一,這裡面還有個很奇特的東西民主黨要廢除關稅政策然而特斯拉的墨西哥工廠反而是美國工廠的兩倍大,墨西哥工廠因為關稅原因延遲了。考慮到奧斯汀是德州深藍區不得不說可能會是個巨大的迴旋鏢。搬遷預計不會產能肯定是要調整了。
Replying to @WSJPolitics
SpaceX and Tesla have prospered in Texas, because we were not constantly operating under an oppressive and extractive state government.
And I need to be close to the factories, so that I can walk the floor in person. That’s why the first major SpaceX factory was in LA and first major Tesla factory was in SF Bay Area.
As California became increasingly difficult, due to extreme taxes and overregulation, we moved our major domestic expansions and HQ to Texas.
午夜將至 retweeted
The Midterm is Not the Endterm
It is too soon to calibrate the direction of the post midterm Democratic and Republican Parties.
But if the first 72 hours are any indication—and despite the soon to be Speaker’s denials—the Left is already bragging about subpoenas, and it is intoxicated by the notion of investigations and impeachments.
Heady Democrats have entirely forgotten the politically suicidal fashion of the 2021-4 five civil and criminal courtroom circuses, the Mar-a-Lago raid, and the blue state deballoting efforts.
All that and more fueled the Trump recovery.
Wild talk of multi-trillion-dollar new agendas grows, like socializing the health care system, a renewed Green New Deal, student loan forgiveness, and illegal alien amnesties, along with new punitive income and estate regulations and taxes.
This socialist dream is reminiscent of the 2021 giddy splurging that gave the country a 9.1% inflation rate by midterm year 2022.
Along with the Afghanistan disaster (the Left’s correction for a Middle East ‘forever war”) the inflation would ensure Biden a 40% popularity.
The idea that the Left, which cannot do much real lawmaking without a veto-proof Congress, will try to reach deals with the White House, adopt a 1995 Clinton-like realist agenda, simply claim credit for the growing Trump economy, or moderate its rhetoric is highly unlikely.
Instead, we hear crazy talk of confiscations, new billionaire and millionaire punitive taxes, imprisonments, changing the Constitution—all in full suicidal 1972 McGovern style.
Republicans are blame-gaming each other, which can be constructive if over issues and reforms rather than social media ad hominem. But they need to message far better, about both the administration’s successes and the dangers of a socialist future.
There will be likely be no planned presidential succession, or gentlemanly agreement on a front runner. That’s likely good news. More likely as of now a triangular race between front-runners De Santis, Rubio, and Vance emerges—all of whom are far preferable to any ticket with a Newsom, Harris, AOC, Mamdani, or el-Sayed.
If the Republicans can stay reasonably united, they can ensure permanent presidential vetoes of crazy leftwing legislation, fight back on the Democratic committee inquisitions, and see the economy in the final two years become an asset in recovering their popularity.
Absent in all conversations is that there is increasing evidence that the economy is actually expanding and has the potential to boom in 2027, or at least the data indicate such potential.
The jobs report came out yesterday with a stunning 165,000 jobs created in October (accompanied by the usual journalists’ adverb “unexpectantly”), dropping unemployment to 4.1%.
Revised 3rd GDP stats now show a robust 3.4% growth—likely ensuring at least 3%+ growth for the year.
Third Quarter consumer spending soared 3.8%.
Private domestic investment surged with 19.4% growth.
Just reported last week: median family income in 2025 hit a new record ($87,460)—the highest in 60 years adjusted for inflation. And poverty dipped to its lowest rate (ever 10.2%).
In October manufacturing activity grew faster than at any time in the past five years.
Yes, prices are too high, and final 2026 inflation, given gas hikes, is scheduled to increase by one point (3.7%) from last year’s (2.7%). But it is still lower than the pan-European average (ca. 4+%)—and much lower than the Biden average over four years of 5.1%.
Gas prices are already falling. On November 6 prices fell to a $4.06 average—as global oil transit is mostly back to prewar levels and refineries scramble to handle the increased deliveries.
U.S. companies are dominating all the top 10 rankings in market capitalization/usage in key area such as software, AI, digital media, space, satellite launches, and bio/genetic engineering.
Note that today gas prices are not that much higher than 4 years ago at the 2022 midterm time ($4.06 vs. ca. $3.80), and haven’t once spiked to $5 a gallon as they did in 2022, just four months before the Biden midterms.
Yet oddly, the red wave sputtered in 2022 when the U.S. was in far worse economic shape than this week when the blue wave became a tsunami.
Messaging, media, and communication count, so note:
Four years ago GDP growth was lower than today—even though the pandemic was about over and there was a dramatic return to work and spending.
The inflation rate was almost three times higher in 2022 than now.
Median family income was $14,000 lower than now. The poverty rate was higher in 2022.
The Dow was 20,000 points lower. Foreign investment will likely end the year 30-40% higher than in 2022.
Real wage growth (nominal wages minus inflation) while not great in 2026 is likely to end the year far better than in 2022 (when real wage growth fell 2-3%).
So why would “affordability” have been decisive in the 2026 midterms when it was not in 2022?
The 21% aggregate inflation rate Trump inherited force-multiplied the average 3.15% Trump inflation rate of 2025-6— yet in a way the aggregate first-term Trump inflation rate (7.7% just a third of the Biden total) did not exaggerate all that much the 9.1% inflation rate in 2022.
Messaging, however, matters. The administration did not explain adequately that a 21% rise in prices cannot be lowered without radical deflation or recession, but only ameliorated by medium family income growth and lowering the inflation rate from the Biden 2021-5 averages, both of which occurred in 2025-6, but were forgotten.
Media coverage of the Biden 2022 weak economy were muted, while Trump’s 2-year inflation rate was exaggerated during 2026.
The Iran war became the culprit as a war of choice that made the inherited Biden 21% high prices and the inability to lower were them solely Trump’s fault. Again, there was inadequate explanation of either the economic reality or why the gamble to denuclearize Iran was defensible–with the caveat that stopping the bombing at day 38 and talking with theocrats for seven months was an unfortunate mistake.
The domestic and foreign policy activism of the lame-duck Clinton (1998-2000} and Obama (2014-2016) presidencies increased after their loss of Congress. Indeed, their popularity climbed from a once nadir of below forty to sixty percent approval or above.
There is no reason why the Trump administration cannot have a successful last two years. The economy is growing.
The crime rate is at historic lows.
The border is closed shut. The radical pro-Western political transformation of South and Central America has remade the entire Western Hemisphere.
European NATO is rearming.
Oil and gas production is at highest levels of any nation in history.
The bloated federal work force has been trimmed by over 270,000 jobs.
There is no longer a 40,000-50,000 shortfall in military recruitment. The forced reforms in higher education were long overdue.
The verdict on Iran is still out.
If it is denuclearized, the crippling sanctions continued, the Strait kept open, the provincial opposition armed—and our military gone home— the regime will face an increasingly restive population
2026 was an unequivocal defeat, but 2028 need not be.
If the administration and Congress stay disciplined and united, and can message better, while the Left goes utterly berserk, drunk on their midterm successes, socialism/Islamism, and Trump Derangement Syndrome 2.0, the tide will soon radically turn— as the economy already has.
因為麥凱恩家族跟川普決裂了,能在地方上當30年參議員都是有自己的選舉機器的,麥凱恩家族在2020年背書了民主黨重創了川普在這個州的基層選票。
The AZ legislature saw a wider swing from R to D than anywhere except NH* and the wins went deep into GOP territory.
The question all the “it’s not their fault it’s Trump’s” people need to answer is: Why did the wave hit AZ harder than other states?
I wrote about why below.
*NH has a 400 member house and massive swings have been the norm for past few cycles.
這些美國大公司做的很缺德,不僅補償金額低而且對於噪音電力費用管控都有大問題跟當地社區產生了很多矛盾,就業回報也很低,一個大型數據中心投產幾十上百億美金,一共只會雇用100人不到。共和黨在德州翻車很重要一點就是保守派社區是非常厭惡數據中心跟他們爭搶資源。
我不明白,
数据中心和美国人民的矛盾有这么大吗?
大厂几千亿美元都掏了,还会差这一点电费?@grok
10 个州 41 项数据中心公投,37 项的结果是限制或叫停。
75% 的人反对在家门口建数据中心。
選舉地圖在2032年前是無法逆轉的,2028年參院能爭取到2席就已經是重大突破了,甚至威斯康星如果gop的候選人不怎麼好還會丟失一個,民主黨2028年會形成兩院超級多數。
Nah, the map matters.
This was a map that fundamentally favored Republicans, but they are going to lose at least 8 (probably 9) Senate seats, and all of them but one (Collins) are in red states.
When Obama lost 9 seats in 2014, it was in states like AK, LA, WV, MT, AR, NC, SD, etc. All of them but CO were red states with old-style "blue dog" Democrat holdovers just waiting to be beaten.
There's just no way to compare that to Democrats taking out Republicans the way they did in red states this cycle. It was bad. Very bad.
ICE搜捕觀感太差,看起來MAGA也是到尾聲階段了,GOP要麼就是後川普路線轉向新移民藍領鐵鏽帶大帳篷黨,要麼就是重新回到建制派的小政府傳統保守主義政黨。都需要在2028年新的總統候選人出來後才能確定。
Susie Wiles said Trump didn't care about the details and that she was running the federal agencies. If we take it at face value that President Trump is delegating management to that extent, it means that Stephen Miller will now be running the same federal agencies. And he's been pent-up waiting for this for the past 2 years. He's going to go full blitzkrieg mode.
當然很困難,其實川普的勝利掩蓋了共和黨很多自身的問題,尤其共和黨的動員機器其實是生鏽的,而且這個事情在後續持續惡化了,尤其是馬斯克這樣的超級PAC介入後大量進行了外行操作,基層黨工建設停滯,最終一發不可收拾。RNC主席一定要清理掉,完全是個該死的弱智。
WaPo: Republicans Find Moving On From Trump Is Hard
As Republicans reckon with a historic rout in Tuesday’s midterm elections, calls to extirpate Trump from the right’s politics are resounding more forcefully than at any point since the first of his three presidential bids
But in a party that has, over the intervening decade, remade itself to a once-unimaginable extent in the president’s image, GOP leaders and activists are finding that creating a “post-Trump” party is easier said than done
washingtonpost.com/politics/…
这名字很久没听过了
NYT: John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Governor and Senator, Dies at 89
The rare Democrat in a fabled family of wealthy Republicans, he served 30 years as senator and helped bring health insurance to millions of low-income children.
nytimes.com/2026/11/06/us/po…





















