Look, I've been running the numbers for months. Google Earth, Stellarium, centre to centre. I keep checking and it just keeps pointing to one thing. Can somebody check this for me please because I can't do it on my own anymore. Carnac - I pinned the big western stone at 47°35'31.10"N 3°05'06.22"W Elevation 20.52m. North is top of pic. 11 rows, decreasing size east, big stones at west with circles. That's the platform you stand on. Rows shoot east 59°. Giza - SE corners of Khufu, Khafre, Menkaure diagonal to Heliopolis. Queens G1a,b,c 180.00° line 100m equal spacing east = Pleiades. MQ1,2,3 180.00° 164m equal south = Sirius. Sphinx centre looks 90.0° due east. Gulf - 150k-12k BCE exposed, size of Britain, above water from 75k BCE. Tigris, Euphrates, Karun, Wadi Baton as ONE Ur-Schatt to Hormuz. Sea 120m lower. Flooded 10k-8k BCE. Göbekli Enclosure D - centre 90.000° due east. Pillar 43 Vulture Stone - scorpion, birds, vulture with wing holding a disc/sphere above wing. People say star map: scorpion = Scorpio, vulture = Sagittarius, birds = Pisces. What if that disc in middle = Regulus = heart of Leo = circle dot centre you stand on? Now roll sky back: Carnac 47.59N / Giza 29.97N / Göbekli 37.22N 2026: Regulus rise 72.3° / 76.3° 4500 BCE when Carnac built: 58.9° / 66.3° = Carnac rows point at Regulus then 8989 BCE: 91.5° DUE EAST / 91.2° DUE EAST / 90.000° DUE EAST = ALL due east 10500 BCE: 103.6° / 100.6° All three - Sphinx 90°, Carnac big stone 91.5°, Göbekli D centre 90.000° - all hit due east Regulus at 8989 BCE. Same year. Not built in 8989 BCE. Ground surveyed at 8989 BCE, stones put on later. Built over older sight. I've checked 100 times. It keeps coming up. Can someone who knows Stellarium, Google Earth Pro, check: 47.5919N -3.0850W and 29.9792N 31.1342E and 37.223N 38.922E Date -8989-03-20 05:55 AM east 90° = Regulus? And Carnac 4500 BCE 58.9° = rows? If I'm wrong tell me. If I'm right - this is the map.

🔥 WHAT ARE BURNT MOUNDS — AND WHY ARE THEY EVERYWHERE 🔥 What is a burnt mound? Burnt mounds are one of the most common yet misunderstood ancient monuments across the world. They're mounds made almost entirely of heat-shattered stone mixed with ash and charcoal, usually sitting right beside a spring, stream or water source. They date mostly from the Neolithic through to the Bronze Age — roughly 4,000–2,500 years ago — but similar sites go back much further. What we find there: • Fire-cracked stone — mostly sandstone, limestone, quartz or chert, deliberately heated then quenched in water • Ash layers — from burning hardwoods like oak, birch, willow and especially hazel • Heated stone troughs — wooden or stone-lined pits that held water, where hot stones were dropped in • Clay lining in some troughs, made waterproof • Very little food waste — so it was not just about cooking dinner every night What were they actually doing? For decades people said: "They heated stones to boil water for cooking." But if you look closely — thousands of tonnes of stone and ash, built up over centuries, right at springs where the water is pure and constant — it's far bigger than a cooking spot for a village. It was a process, not a kitchen. Heating stone → quenching it → extracting minerals, making alkaline solutions, processing materials — the same principles we're exploring now. 🌍 AND THE SAME SITES ARE EVERYWHERE — JUST UNDER DIFFERENT NAMES Ireland & Scotland: Burnt mounds / fulachta fia — thousands recorded, often along river valleys and spring lines Scandinavia: Kokegroper or cooking pits — but the scale and chemistry don't match just cooking. Found across Norway, Sweden and Denmark France & Iberia: Stone-heating installations often near springs — frequently labelled "ritual sites" or "water sanctuaries" because no one could work out exactly what was going on North America: Similar stone-boiling pits and ash mounds found across the Eastern woodlands and Midwest — again, written off as cooking hearths rather than industrial/processing sites The Near East & Middle East: Ancient water-management structures with fired stone and ash layers — often interpreted simply as cisterns or bathhouses, but the ash chemistry tells a bigger story Southern Africa: Stone-and-water processing sites linked to traditional knowledge systems — still remembered by some communities as places where materials were transformed, not just food cooked The pattern is the same everywhere: ✅ Right at a spring or clean water source ✅ Heated stone + water + ash ✅ Built and used over generations ✅ Misidentified everywhere as just "camping/cooking spots" It's looking more and more like this wasn't random — it was a shared technology. A way of working with stone, water and fire that people carried with them, all across the world. The names change, but the method stays exactly the same. 🌏