Maybe we should stop pretending that we carefully review AI-generated code. Not all software is equal. Some of it is critical, but the majority is not. What if we separated human-written & AI-generated code entirely? This might be at the system, project, or module level: some modules might be end-to-end AI-generated and maintained, with people involved in writing feature requests, reporting bugs, and providing usage feedback. They wouldn’t, however, ever touch or read the code. That would resolve the (human) code review problem. But some code is critical, or needs the extra innovation, say, a novel architecture, that humans excel at. That code could be deliberately developed by humans ONLY. No AIs allowed. Hard questions remain: how to identify "critical" software upfront? What if a piece of AI-generated software becomes critical?